5 reasons why the Audi RS6 (C5) is better than the BMW M5 (E39)

With the prices of these two autobahn chasers hovering under and around 20.000€, which is incredible value for money, let’s explore 5 of the reasons why an Audi RS6 might just be a better choice than BMW’s idea of the ultimate driving machine was in the late 90s.

(And yes, I will be doing the reverse article in the coming days as well)

1. You can have it as an estate

An estate version of the BMW M5 is something forum members spend their weekends discussing, yet the boffins from Munich never sold anyone an estate version of their performance flagship (at least not for the E39 generation).
When you consider that in the RS6 you can have 4 people sitting in great comfort, silence and luxury, with all their luggage, carrying a coffee table and a healthy sized dog in the boot (ask me how I found that out), all the while having enough performance to double the highest speed limit allowed in Europe with room to spare, suddenly, buying a E39 M5 doesn’t make as much sense as it once did, at least not to the family man.

2. Fuel "economy"

Now, of course you’re never going to get any reasonable MPG figures out of either, and nor should you expect to. However, it’s worth noting that while the M5 barely manages to stay in the low teens, and only when driven extra carefully, the RS6 usually hangs around 19 MPG (which won’t actually let you befriend any polar bears either) with a sensible, calm and relaxed driver behind the wheel. With how high maintenance and running costs of such machines can be, saving money on petrol becomes very relevant indeed. Plus you can tell the missus it’s somewhat sensible.

3. 4WD

As Chris Harris once pointed out, in the world of automotive journalists, 4WD means understeer and added weight, while rear wheel drive equals fun and powerslides. In the “real” world however, having a powerful car with 4WD means that you won’t need a new pair of pants (boxers or briefs, whatever floats your boat) every time you exit a hairpin on a rainy day; and that the Audi’s acceleration will be just as brutal as it is on dry tarmac.
Alternatively, if you spend a few days of your winter in ski resorts, or if you live in snowy areas, 4WD also gives you that little extra peace of mind. In any RWD car however, especially cars such as the M5, you better get ready to kneel before your rear wheel arches, in said snow, and hug them for a while in cold weather while you try to fit those god forsaken chains, ruining your family’s skiing holiday.
Audi’s system is also quite clever. In fact, it’s so clever I barely understand it myself.

4. Torque

Arguably more than the maximum torque a car produces, it’s where it produces it that matters. The RS6 produces 560 N.m of it everywhere (essentially) and despite its considerable weight, it still welds you to the seat each and every time you go near the throttle. To be honest, it’s a bit intimidating at first (especially in town and slow moving traffic). However once you get used to the feeling of overtaking delivery trucks you’d otherwise be tailgating in an instant, nothing can replace the feeling that the Audi’s ability to grip the road and haul you out of corners with the might of a freight train gives you.
Because it’s naturally aspirated, the M5 has a bit less torque. That’s not to say it’s a puny amount, but in the irrational world of petrolheads, where clouds are made of tyre smoke, where owning a Prius is a punishable offence, and where 400bhp+ family cars make sense, more is better.

5. It comes with an automatic gearbox

Automatic gearboxes aren’t usually a “pro” of performance-oriented cars, but in the RS6 it makes sense. Not only is it responsive and smooth, it also benefits from a great manual mode - so you can milk the torque curve without it kicking down and becoming extra shouty. An auto also means you can daily drive it sensibly, i.e. without having an painful and obnoxiously swollen left leg after spending 20 minutes in rush hour traffic. It’s quite far from the slush-boxes like the ones americans swore by in the later half of last century.
Going back to the “family car” aspect, an automatic transmission is just easier to live with, while detracting very little from the experience (in this particular case). From my personal ownership experience, I never felt I wanted a third pedal.

BONUS: You get tailgating rights

Comments

10VTQ

Haha! Wonderfull :P

11/21/2015 - 19:53 |
1 | 0
Louis Emelina

In reply to by 10VTQ

Thank you :D !!

11/21/2015 - 19:54 |
1 | 0
Lassë Lund

I would like to say something: The E39 was available as an Estate

11/21/2015 - 21:56 |
0 | 0

It was yes, but not as an M5 unfortunately … The closest thing you could get from the factory would have been a 540i Touring, though I imagine it wasn’t that hard to convert one into an M5 Touring.
In BMW’s defence, they did sell estate E60 M5s, but those were hindered by the same defects as the saloon unfortunately (crazy low range, jerky gearbox, questionable styling …). But those remain an interesting choice today :)

11/21/2015 - 22:00 |
1 | 0
Mihai-Sebastian Călin

Nicely made! Kudos, mate.

11/21/2015 - 23:06 |
6 | 0
llP VeIoclty

Good review but again it’s all very subjective and generally comes down to the persons situation, ie family man, single etc etc. But the key is if you really enjoy driving and want the sheer driving experience then the m5 is a no brainer.

11/22/2015 - 00:14 |
1 | 0

I absolutely agree with you. I’m going to be doing the article the other way around (expect it monday), with a conclusion on which is better for what.

11/22/2015 - 00:22 |
0 | 0
BoxerRoadster

Now, after moving to Europe, I’m looking for a car that is unavailable in the US. I’m stuck between an RS6 Plus, an E61 M5, or a C63 AMG 507 Estate.

11/22/2015 - 00:27 |
0 | 0

Well, like I mentioned above, I’ll be doing the same article in favour of the E39 M5 in the next coming days. It all depends on your lifestyle, family, no family, do you live in twisty parts, rainy/snowy a lot? Unfortunately I haven’t had the chance of driving the E60/61 M5, nor the C63 (or in fact any Mercedes I just realised :o ), so I couldn’t tell you which to choose. But the RS6 is very hard to fault. I’d say, if they’re all automatics anyway, why not take the 4WD and monster torque ? Might be a bit less shouty, but that’s good for those late nights driving home from your in-laws with the GF sleeping in the passenger seat :)

11/22/2015 - 00:34 |
0 | 0
Guillaume 9

Very well made!

11/22/2015 - 00:48 |
1 | 0

Thank you :) means a lot from a seasoned member such as yourself!

11/22/2015 - 00:56 |
0 | 0
Jeremie Legere

The M5 is still much prettier and much more…how to explain this…a true piece of art altogheter

11/22/2015 - 05:30 |
0 | 0

having driven and sort of lived with both, at times one is better than the other. But look for the reverse article tomorrow, with a conclusion :)

11/22/2015 - 12:46 |
1 | 0
Tuners World

Good post, better than the opposite one. But i prefer the C6 :)

11/23/2015 - 20:30 |
1 | 0

Thanks!

11/23/2015 - 20:35 |
0 | 0

Sponsored Posts