Hennessey Is Targetting 500kmh With The Venom F5

John Hennessey has expressed his desire to hit 500kmh (310mph) with the F5
Hennessey Is Targetting 500kmh With The Venom F5

Breaking the 300mph barrier is only the first goal for Venom F5. Company founder John Hennessey not so long ago labelled the speed as a mere “baseline” when talking to Topgear.com, but how far beyond that does he have in mind?

“I’d like to run 500 kph. Which is 311 [mph] and change,” he said in a recent interview with Motor Authority. It’s actually 310.68, but hey, that’s close enough.

What’s particularly interesting is although the car’s 7.4-litre twin-turbo V8 has been tested beyond 2000bhp, it won’t need anywhere near that to hit 300. “Currently our CFD testing and our engineers tell us we need about 1520 horsepower to break 300,” he said.

While the engine and the car’s aero setup will deliver the goods, a question mark remains over suitable tyres. Finding a location for the run is another hurdle - the 3.2-mile Shuttle landing strip used for the original Venom’s run won’t be long enough. John Hennessey is said to be in discussions with the state of Texas for assistance in completing high-speed runs, which may well involve closing off a long section of road, as Nevada did for Koenigsegg last year.

Hennessey isn’t the only company aiming for incredible top speeds. SSC recently claimed it was the “only ones that really have a legitimate shot” at topping 300mph, using its Tuatara. When Motor Authority asked John Hennessey for a comment on what SSC almost certainly intended to be a reference to his company’s efforts, he simply said: “The bullshit stops when the green flag drops.”

Christian Koenigsegg has previously said 300mph in the Agera RS is technically possible, although it seems there are no plans to take the car further than it has been already. Meanwhile, 300mph is not thought to be doable for the Chiron, even if tyres could be made to take the extreme forces experienced at that kind of speed.

Sponsored Posts

Comments

3 Wheels Is Enough (MadJoeMak)(ReliantRobin)(e46)

Holyshiiiizt

09/27/2018 - 09:32 |
0 | 0
Tomislav Celić

Isn’t it funny how Koenigsegg didn’t quote a top speed until they did a run and even suprised themselves

You see these guys look like they are from the opposite side of the spectrum.

And wouldn’t it be better PR wise to develop a project in complete silence and mystery and then reveal it and boom, we have a 500 km/h machine that rich people would instantly scoop up. This way they just look unprofessional.

And let’s not get into the Hennesseys credibility

09/27/2018 - 09:53 |
178 | 4

Also they weren’t able to make a fast enough car the first time, so why could they now?

09/27/2018 - 09:58 |
4 | 4

This is their PR.
They make rich people want the car because is fast, then you pay a big sum and the car under performs and they say the tech is unavailable.

09/27/2018 - 10:04 |
56 | 2

How else would it generate Publicity then?

They do kinda need the cash tbh

09/27/2018 - 10:38 |
16 | 0

Wouldn’t it be better to actually finish customer cars instead of taking out the engine, wheels, and fenders for months on end, and spending the customer’s money on various other projects?

09/27/2018 - 10:50 |
6 | 2

Dodge has the same problem

09/28/2018 - 07:12 |
0 | 2
CannedRex24

Is it just me, or does the rear end look like

uhmmm…..

09/27/2018 - 10:41 |
52 | 4

Holy ship lmao

09/27/2018 - 11:25 |
2 | 0
09/27/2018 - 11:30 |
8 | 2

Thank you now I can’t unsee it

09/27/2018 - 11:36 |
26 | 0

so a returning trend that was started by the f12 berlinetta?

09/27/2018 - 13:44 |
14 | 0
dmackster1124

TBH I’m a bit of koeniggsegg fan but I definitely enjoyed the “the bullshit stops when the green flag drops”

09/27/2018 - 10:51 |
32 | 0

The question is will they do two runs tonmake it official, since we already know that customer cars and the record attempting one won’t have the same spec.

09/27/2018 - 23:39 |
0 | 0
Skyline_Fanboi ( Apex05)

Just imagine ome passing you at 500km/h and you blink for .1 seconds and miss it.

10/02/2018 - 19:07 |
0 | 0