Engineering Explained: 6 Cars That Make No Logical Sense

Some cars should never have left the concept room, but somehow, this lot ended up on our driveways anyway...
Engineering Explained: 6 Cars That Make No Logical Sense

Car buying always has been, and always will be, an emotional experience. Whether or not you even like cars, logic is often thrown out the window when you arrive at the dealer lot. Here are six cars which make no logical sense, matched with the car that should be bought instead.

  1. VW Beetle R-Line
  2. Cadillac ELR
  3. Mustang V6
  4. Lexus IS250
  5. Kia Forte Koup
  6. Aston Martin Cygnet

1. VW Beetle R-Line

Remote video URL

My favourite of the group, and the inspiration for this article, the VW Beetle R-Line is ousted in every way by the VW Golf GTI. Here’s the decision to make: you could spend $25,995 for the bottom shelf trim Beetle R-Line. Or, you could keep 1000 of those dollars for a car that has the same power, but 51 more torque units that come on 200rpm sooner. Not only that, you’ll be getting 2mpg better in the city and 3mpg better on the highway thanks to it weighing over 80 pounds less (-30kg), and having a drag coefficient of 0.31 over the Beetle’s 0.37. Cargo volume? How about an additional 22.8 cu ft. (+645 litres) in the Golf with both cars having the rear seats folded down (it’s not like the Beetle’s rear seats are useable anyway).

So to recap, for $1000 less, you get a car that’s faster, more fuel efficient, more aerodynamic, lighter, has more cargo space, and can actually fit four adults. Long live the GTI!

2. Cadillac ELR

Engineering Explained: 6 Cars That Make No Logical Sense

Whether or not the launch of the Chevrolet Volt was a success, the logic behind the design is sound. It’s a car that can offer a completely green way to get to work and back, assuming the distance is short enough, without the range anxiety associated with its purely electric counterparts. Run out of electric juice? No problem, a 1.4-litre petrol engine kicks in and you’re back to emitting EV repellent.

Then, GM became greedy. For 2014 it threw the Volt power plant underneath Cadillac’s exquisite metal stamping, included slightly larger electric motors (mind you, in EV mode it still took 8.8 seconds to hit 60mph), and raised the price from $34k to $75k. It’s as bad a deal as it sounds, and the market called GM’s bluff. For 2016 the ELR experienced a $9000 price drop and gained significant performance benefits.

3. Mustang V6

Remote video URL

The new V6 Mustang is a lose-lose situation. If you cared about fuel economy, you could have a four-cylinder version which produces more power, 40lb/ft more torque, and brings in an extra 5mpg (manual trans). If your right foot wasn’t connected to your bank account, you’ll lose 2mpg but gain 135 horsepower and 120lb/ft with the V8. The V6 was made for fleet sales or those who want a convertible Mustang on the cheap, not the enthusiast.

4. Lexus IS250

Remote video URL

Last year in November, I had the opportunity to try out a fully loaded 2015 Lexus IS250 with AWD that was just shy of $47,000. While I found the aesthetics stunning, the plant burner under the hood was severely underwhelming. For comparison, a Kia Sedona (yes, a minivan) has a better power-to-weight ratio. The IS250’s V6 put out just 204 horses, yet for $3000 you could option up for 306hp. Granted, $3000 is a considerable amount of money, but for the car I drove to have exactly 50 per cent more power it was only a six per cent price hike (larger brakes included as well). Considering fuel economy was only 1mpg worse, those who overlooked the engine option checkbox read over the specs faster than their car will ever be. Luckily, Lexus has made revisions so now the IS350 is paired with a turbo IS200, producing more power in a smaller package.

5. Kia Forte Koup

Remote video URL

The Kia Forte Koup SX and the Hyundai Veloster Turbo share a lot in common. They both have twin-scroll turbo 1.6-litre engines producing 201hp, and they both offer six-speed manual transmissions. But for just $1000 more, the Veloster offers more front legroom and headroom, significantly more cargo space (it’s a hatch), 3mpg combined better fuel economy, and it’s about 50lbs (22kg) lighter. That’s $1000 well spent!

6. Aston Martin Cygnet

Engineering Explained: 6 Cars That Make No Logical Sense

It’s not every day that you get to spend $50,000 on a car that hits 60mph in the double digits (11.6 seconds). For three times the price of the Toyota iQ that the internals are directly pulled from, you could have had an Aston Martin badge and the luxury of convenient parking. Or you know, you could have had that luxury with an additional $30k+ in the bank. Dollar for dollar, there probably wasn’t a worse choice you could make in the car world. That said, I’d still love to have one.

While none of the cars above make much logical sense, I do certainly believe that the car world is a greater place as a result of diversity. Though I would probably never recommend any of the aforementioned rides to a friend (that would be rude), I’m happy that they exist. What other cars make the list?

Follow me on Car Throttle for more articles, videos and pics!

Comments

Tekknoraver

With that Aston,its not that iternals are pulled out from toyota,its The Toyota badge pulled out from front and replaced with Aston badge;) And yes i know that you know this ;)

12/06/2015 - 19:29 |
0 | 0
Chris6

I’d still buy the V6 over the ecoboost lol

12/06/2015 - 19:57 |
0 | 0
Blodørn

Honestly, where I live, a V6 Mustang is actually cheaper to insure than the EcoBoost, simply because of the turbos. So it definitely does have a place in the market, at least for young people.

12/06/2015 - 20:52 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

Pt cruiser !

12/06/2015 - 20:55 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

The cygnet is only made so that Aston can meet EU emissions requirements across their range, they never really intended it to be a serious car, hence why they just borrowed the toyota iq…

12/06/2015 - 21:22 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

I have a v6 mustang and am a car enthusiast. I have a 2014 6 speed manual performance pack v6. Beats the ecoboost in every aspect, even has better mpg. They detuned the 2015 v6 to have less power and worse mpg to make the ecoboost look better. So don’t say a v6 mustang isn’t an enthusiasts car.

12/06/2015 - 21:55 |
3 | 0
Driven to Drive 1

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Nice drawing!

12/07/2015 - 00:57 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Car enthusiast maybe, but mustang drivers know that it’s not really a mustang without the V8, plain and simple.

12/07/2015 - 14:55 |
1 | 1
Caleb

Can’t really say car prices make no logical sense when comparing cars from different companies. Companies all have different marginal costs and only power specs and accessories are compared.

12/06/2015 - 22:10 |
0 | 0
Ruben Alsaker

The headline “no logical sense” makes no logical sense

12/06/2015 - 22:26 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

the aston martin cynget exsists so that aston martin can keep down their average emmisions for italy… i think

12/06/2015 - 22:46 |
2 | 0
Anonymous

the Mustang V6 was actually kept primarily for rental car companies

12/06/2015 - 22:52 |
0 | 0

Topics

Manufacturers

Sponsored Posts