3 Reasons Not to Hate the French Cars.

3 Reasons not to hate French cars.

alt text

I spend a lot of time reading comments on the internet that express the hate that some people have against French cars. So I think I need to clarify some things about them, to show you that they deserve some love.

I’m not writing this as a propaganda for the French brands nor because I’m a pro-French things, but because I’m a true car lover, and as a car guy, you may understand me when I say that hating a car brand just because you don’t like the car’s design or nationality is plain stupidity, we all have our own tastes. So here are some things you should know about me: first of all, yes, I’m French. Secondly, I love cars in general: I drive a 2005 Citroën Xsara Break (diesel, 90hp, 100k miles), and my two dream cars are a 1970 Dodge Charger R/T and a 1995 Nissan Skyline R33 GT-R. And Finally, this is my first article, and English isn’t my native language (obviously), so please, be kind.

But let’s not make you wait any longer, here are my pros :

1. The place of France in the Automotive History

Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot, a French inventor, is widely credited with building the first full-scale, self-propelled mechanical vehicle or automobile in about 1769; he created a steam-powered tricycle called "Le Fardier de Cugnot". Father Ferdinand Verbiest, a Belgian Flemish Jesuit missioner, may have been the first to design and most likely to build, around 1672, "a steam-powered vehicle" but that was too small to carry a driver or passengers.

alt text

In November 1881, French inventor Gustave Trouvé demonstrated a working three-wheeled car powered by electricity at the International Exposition of Electricity, Paris.

The first car to pass the 100km/h bar was the French electric car "La Jamais contente" (literally translated as "the never satisfied").

alt text

The outlines of the current car as we know it are plotted in 1922 with Lancia Lambda and the self-supporting body and independent front suspension, in 1934 with Chrysler Airflow which introduced the aerodynamics, Citroen and the development of the Traction Avant (FWD) in 1934, and the introduction of disc brakes on the DS in 1955, or by Porsche and the box bevel gear synchronizers of the 356 and finally in 1959 with the Mini Morris with the first engine in transverse position.

alt text

2. They are great cars

This is one of the most untrue stereotype about the French Brands: "They aren’t reliable". My very first car was a 1997 Citroën ZX Break. Not very beautiful, but it had its charm. I sold it a few months ago for 250€, with +330k kms (more than 206k miles) and some bumps and scrathes (was involved in 4 small crashes, not by me and never in fault). Electric windows? Still working! Anti-start code device? Tired but working too! The lights on the dashboard were a bit too feeble, but she was still ready to eat the road for a long time.

alt text

And that’s what all French cars are, cars. by this, I mean that they are great cars that won’t fail you. Of course there are some that are worse than the others, but it’s the same for every car brand.

Indeed, I won’t deny that at some point of their own History, some French brands had a bad time. It happens, but sadly as we say "Il faut plusieurs générations pour bâtir une réputation, mais il n’en faut qu’une pour la détruire", which means "you need several generations to build a reputation, but only one to destroy it".

Nowadays French car brands are way better than you could think, so good that other brands uses engines, bodies or entire cars for their own product range (for example, Mercedes uses DCI engines from Renault for their A, B and C classes or the body of the Renault Kangoo for their compact utility vehicle Citane).

alt text

And indeed, don’t mix Quality and Reliability.

3. Their Racing Gene.

A little quote of Forza Motorsport 3, during the loading screen, once said "Peugeot is the only manufacturer that can brag about having victory records in three different centuries". That is actually true. Not only as a car maker of course, but that sentence still says something.

You know them : Bugatti, Alpine, Renault, Citroën, Peugeot, Matra,… Rally, Formula One, LeMans Endurance series, BTCC, WTCC, Pikes Peak,…

alt text

Every French Car Brand has won in Racing. And every french sports car has it in its genes. They even said in right here, on CT! "If you’re a keen driver, you need to get the RCZ R. Trust me. Every aspect of the way it drives when you’re kicking its head in is leaps and bounds ahead of the TT, and I guarantee after a hoon in both, the Peugeot’s the one that’ll put the bigger smile on your face. Badge snobs be damned." Want to know more about that? It’s here : link text .

alt text

Ever drove a 205 1.9 GTI? A test driver once said "You’ll need racing skills to master this monster". 130hp only? Yup, but power never ment performance. You know what someone said : "If you’re not fast with 90hp, 900 won’t help you". That’s what is all about French sports car, power isn’t necessary if you have the right chassis.

alt text

That is all I can say for now, without making an extra-long article that would be too consistent to be readable. So if you’ve reached this point, thank you for the time you spent reading this and I hope that you’re more likely to not spread the hate, for our Frenchies and for all cars in general, because after all, it’s just a matter of opinion.

Little bonus : I want to clarify something that seems to be a good starting point of hate about French cars : the Volvo vs Modus Crash test. Yes, old Volvo’s are known for being Tanks. No, the engine hasn’t been removed for the crash test, it’s just that it is not in a transversal position but in a longitudinal position, so when the two car went on a 3/4 front collision, the engine was moved on left-side of the engine bay. No, the Volvo isn’t safer than a Modus. Why? Because the Volvo was engineered during an era when Euro N-CAP wasn’t there to rule the safety of the cars. So yes it was a tank back then, but now it isn’t anymore. Sorry guys.

And for the video where you can see a red Volvo wagon hit some old cars on a scrapyard, you can clearly see that they are using things as ramps to avoid the high strength parts of the cars that are normally collided during a crash, this resulting on a heavier car crashing with it’s own strengthened body parts on cars-parts where it’s not supposed to crash. So it may appear that the Volvo is a true tank, but it’s just tricks and lies. Sorry again guys…

Internet traditions must be respected, Sorry for the long post so here is a potato-car :

alt text

Sponsored Posts

Comments

Anonymous

I think that it would be appropriate to post this here.

08/11/2015 - 00:56 |
1 | 0
Kalandaari

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

This car was an awesome cruising ship. And yes, what hey said on this ad is true haha !

08/11/2015 - 07:44 |
0 | 0
Dimi3

Thank you for this fantastic article! It is absolutely true what you say! I drive around in a 2004 Renault Mégane Sedan 1.5 l Diesel and if you read what I just recently posted it will probably put a smile on your face! :)

08/11/2015 - 01:04 |
1 | 0
Kalandaari

In reply to by Dimi3

I’ll take the time to read that ! And thanks for your positive feedback, it’s nice to see people that enjoy their french ride :D

08/11/2015 - 07:43 |
0 | 0
panor86

Great post!!! Thanks!!!!

08/11/2015 - 01:06 |
2 | 0
Anonymous

My dad had a Citroen XM 2.5td before 7 or so years and it was truly awesome, the ride was the best I have ever experienced, but the handling was very good too, it had many gadgets to play with and it was very fast for its engine which was pretty economical too. It was very reliable, it had done around 200k. km (little more than 124k. miles) when my dad bought it, and he sold it with around 280k. km (around 174k. miles) on the clock. The only things that he had changed were the air filter and the brake pads, but those things are pretty normal. And we hadn’t had a single problem with it. The only time the car refused to start was when I played with the heated electric seats too much and I had drained the battery, but that has nothing to do with reliability. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVPXgvOl0xc

08/11/2015 - 01:07 |
3 | 0
Kalandaari

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

The XM was a great cruising ship, very confortable. The grand grand son of the DS !

08/11/2015 - 07:28 |
0 | 0
HfromB

I don’t hate french cars but their designs were ugly during 1990-2005

08/11/2015 - 01:24 |
2 | 0
Kalandaari

In reply to by HfromB

The design is always a matter of opinion. This era was bad for Renault in particular (lasted until 2008), and Citroen too when it’s about design.

08/11/2015 - 07:41 |
1 | 0
Velstyde

I used to be guilty of this as a kid. That’s what it is, an immature opinion.

08/11/2015 - 01:34 |
2 | 1

Yup, but sometime even grown up people still have this opinion.

08/11/2015 - 07:40 |
0 | 0
boss390

You know what: My dad’s Twingo C06 made 800,000km. It still went to the junkyard on it’s on tires. But the body was rusted. And when they soled the engine, than it still runs today!

08/11/2015 - 02:00 |
2 | 0

That’s very nice ! Every Frenchies can do that if you treat them well, that’s why you see a lot of old french cars in africa : they are reliable, and cheap to repair, so they still run today :)

08/11/2015 - 07:38 |
2 | 0
Joakim Giske Tvete

I used to dislike most French cars until I saw the segment about Peugeot on Top Gear. For once they were actually quite informative!

08/11/2015 - 02:10 |
4 | 1
NickM895

I’ve always thought French cars were interesting, mainly because we don’t get them here in the US.

08/11/2015 - 02:17 |
9 | 1

You dont get them? You mean they are not imported like the rest automotive brands? Why?

08/11/2015 - 09:38 |
1 | 1
Petrol head Anthony

I don’t like Renault cause the cars are ugly and cheap

08/11/2015 - 02:30 |
1 | 1

The beauty of the car is a matter of tastes. I didn’t liked the 2002-2008 Renault’s design, but nowadays ones look great in my opinion. But cheap doesn’t necessarily mean bad ;)

08/11/2015 - 07:35 |
0 | 0