5 Cars That Have Actually Improved After Downsizing

These cars show that 'no replacement for displacement' is a thing of the past
5 Cars That Have Actually Improved After Downsizing

Downsizing has begun to dominate the world of performance cars with some of the greatest marques of all time giving in to the new normal. Due to a massive shift in emission laws and a war on fuel consumption, even the powerhouses of the car market have decided to reduce engine displacement and instead turbocharge their powertrains.

Despite the seemingly unattractive shift to smaller engines, many manufacturers have taken advantage of the new legislations and created performance cars that in fact top the previous gas-guzzling generation. With benefits like greater power and accessible torque which comes lower in the rev range, downsizing has set up shop in these high-end performance cars.

Porsche 991.2 Carrera

5 Cars That Have Actually Improved After Downsizing

Porsche’s icon has - for over five decades – been famed for its flat-six engine which has slowly gained in capacity and power. With the 911 Turbo once being the sole turbocharged sect of the rear-engined breed, mass uproar began when the men and women from Stuttgart decided to turbocharge almost all of the 911 range, right down to the base Carrera.

With fears surrounding the downsizing from 3.8 to 3-litres in the Carrera S, Porsche blew away its critics with the 991.2, a twin-turbocharged weapon that has trumped all the other generations of 911 in terms of performance. To put the effect of downsizing into perspective, the Carrera S can now accelerate to 62mph in the same time as the Carrera GT (3.9 seconds). Along with electric steering and torque readily available from the get-go, the new generation of 911 has progressed Porsche into a new era of performance.

Mercedes-AMG C63

5 Cars That Have Actually Improved After Downsizing

Once sporting a brutal 6.2-litre V8, Merc’s most popular muscle car now has just a 4.0-litre unit, with two turbochargers in a hot-V formation. With the standard car outputting 469bhp and the ‘S’ variant pushing out over 500bhp, the C63 is still very much a super saloon. Since it still has a V8, it seems a much more tempting package than its downsizing rival, the most recent BMW M3.

Ford Mustang EcoBoost

5 Cars That Have Actually Improved After Downsizing

Since the 1960s, the Mustang has been the quintessential muscle car without question. Always using a bruising V8 powertrain to maximise pantomime over efficiency, the ‘Stang has fully grown up and is now very much part of the downsizing craze. Ford now produces a Mustang with an EcoBoost inline-four-cylinder engine producing 310bhp. Although this is over 100bhp down on the 5.0-litre V8 model that’s also on sale, the downsized car is only a second behind in the sprint to 62mph.

Boasting a lighter weight than the V8, reduced running costs and performance that dominates the last generation of Mustang, the 2.3-litre Mustang has shown us that even halving the number of cylinders in a pure muscle car can still work for the better in terms of drivability. And hey, if only a big engine will do, the V8’s still there.

Aston Martin DB11

5 Cars That Have Actually Improved After Downsizing

Following on from our drive of the car, it’s clear that the brand new DB11 has taken the recipe of the outgoing DB9 and successfully modified it to keep up with the modern climate. Instead of having to rev out the old 5.9-litre V12, the low down torque of the still-voluptuous 5.2-litre unit has made the Aston an even more capable grand tourer.

It may not have the supercar pedigree of a Ferrari F12, but the latest flagship motor from Aston has fought the battle of downsizing, and won. You can’t really argue with a 600bhp Aston Martin, and if you still want to rev it out you’re well catered for - peak power doesn’t arrive until 6500rpm, and the red line 500rpm after that.

Ferrari 488 GTB

5 Cars That Have Actually Improved After Downsizing

Although many journalists have slammed the 488 for its lack of theatre when compared to the 458, there is no doubting its technical ability and dominance in the supercar world. Using it’s 3.9-litre twin turbocharged V8, the GTB produces its maximum torque of 561lbft at just 3000rpm compared to the 458’s 398lbft at 6000rpm. This gives the newer Ferrari a huge advantage in its accessibility of performance, hence why the 488 will get around the Fiorano Test Circuit half a second quicker than its predecessor.

Following on from the 911’s older hypercar-killing achievements, the 488 produces 10bhp more than the Ferrari Enzo ever did back in the day, topping out at 661bhp. Couple that extreme power output with a sublime chassis that pours communication into the cabin for the driver to exploit and Ferrari has yet again pulled it out of the bag. With the F40 being the last twin-turbocharged, mid-engine prancing horse, the 488 shows that, again, downsizing is no bad thing for even the most extreme performance cars.

5 Cars That Have Actually Improved After Downsizing

At the dawn of downsizing a couple of years ago, all petrolheads groaned in disbelief at some of the engine choices being made from our favourite manufacturers. They were reducing emissions and costs at the expense of beloved engine capacity and we weren’t happy at all. But now having given the engineers a chance to prove themselves, the new breed of turbocharged monsters has allowed for impressive performance gains without taking away too much from the overall driving experience.

With downsizing spreading throughout the automotive community – from EcoBoost Fiestas to the DB11 – it looks like the age of the turbocharger has well and truly begun. And with turbochargers themselves being engineered to spool seamlessly, it can be very difficult to tell the difference between the outgoing and new powertrains, save a couple of hundred revs taken off the limiter. These cars have increased their drivability, and that can only be a good thing.

Comments

Poke

Lamborghini and Pagani laughs

08/21/2016 - 09:08 |
486 | 8
Jingkit

In reply to by Poke

[DELETED]

08/21/2016 - 13:53 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

In reply to by Poke

FYI: Pagani went from 7.3 litre V12 to a twin-turbo 6.0 V12.

08/21/2016 - 14:19 |
116 | 0
Anonymous

In reply to by Poke

What about the viper…the only modern supercar that actually consistently grows bigger lol started out at like 8.0 - 8.3 - 8.4

08/23/2016 - 03:19 |
36 | 0
Anonymous

In reply to by Poke

Hahaha

08/23/2016 - 09:16 |
0 | 0
Zubayer Rezoan

A muscle car with Ecoboost….

08/21/2016 - 09:17 |
254 | 6

The Ecoboost is a pony car, m8

08/21/2016 - 14:33 |
62 | 2
Ditras

But still, I will stick with the big blocks

08/21/2016 - 09:17 |
38 | 2
Anonymous

No replacement for displacement is NOT a thing of the past. Try and put a twin turbo on a 6 liter engine and all of these 4 liter engines are left behind. This is just a phase until we need more power.

08/21/2016 - 09:31 |
46 | 2
Mr.Beam

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Jep. You can’t make 1000HP out of 2 liters and Beat a Lexus in Running Time (the time the engine runs without failure).
You could make it out of 8 Liters easily though.

08/21/2016 - 10:32 |
32 | 2
Nissan 420sx

Meanwhile the Chiron is laughing.. Downsizing? You mean 8.0 liter w16 quadturbo

08/21/2016 - 09:51 |
200 | 2

You wonder why Bugatti loses money on every car they make

It’s because they don’t downsize

I would cry though if they did

08/21/2016 - 09:57 |
34 | 8

and loses to multiple Koenigseggs.

08/21/2016 - 13:26 |
4 | 4

you mean boat with 4 wheels

08/23/2016 - 21:32 |
0 | 0
James Martin

You can’t simply say “it performs better therefore it has improved”… I would suggest cars like the BMW M4, the Porsche Cayman/Boxster and even the Civic Type-R have arguably lost a good part of their character in the change of engine.

The DB11 and the Ferrari by all accounts have managed to get through unscathed, but maybe that’s because they go to such great effort to hide their turbocharged natures? The Aston is still a 5.2L V12, so hardly lacking grunt - and Ferrari only give you full torque in 7th in order to give the car a NA-type power curve - the torque is limited quite heavily. So it’s not as simple as the article implies…

08/21/2016 - 13:47 |
18 | 0

Thank you. I hate these articles where Faster=Better.

08/22/2016 - 09:25 |
4 | 0
JenstheGTIfreak (pizza)

488 only is a 3.9???

08/21/2016 - 13:52 |
2 | 0

yup. down from the outgoing 4.5L. that’s what they mean when they say downsizing

08/21/2016 - 14:03 |
0 | 0
America

Texas doesn’t approve

08/21/2016 - 14:36 |
2 | 0
Anonymous

I’ll try to explain downsizing in a very easy form.
Would you rather have a big meaty chunk of pork to eat with its carrots and veggies and all that gravy or would you rather eat a small pill with the same calories but just a pill with no flavour?

08/21/2016 - 15:14 |
2 | 0
Anonymous

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

i’d rather have the food 😳

08/21/2016 - 15:44 |
2 | 0
Marc601

Why not the M4?
I know, we do all miss the great V8 sound of the E92, but the 6 cylinder bi turbo is much quicker.

08/21/2016 - 16:12 |
0 | 0

I don’t really think it qualifies as downsizing if there have been so many generations of M3s and only the last one was a V8.

08/21/2016 - 16:33 |
2 | 0

Or the amazing sounding V10 in the E60 M5

08/26/2016 - 03:12 |
2 | 0

Topics

Sponsored Posts