Trump Could Reverse All US Emissions Legislation For Cars

Love him or loathe him, Donald Trump has got some strong opinions. Among them is that emissions legislation is hurting American competitiveness, and he could be en route to repealing it all
Trump Could Reverse All US Emissions Legislation For Cars

Donald Trump could repeal the legislation forcing manufacturers to produce ever-cleaner cars, potentially causing thousands of deaths due to increased air pollution.

Cars and trucks collectively account for a fifth of all US emissions and both Democrats and Republicans alike have worked to reduce that through laws forcing car makers to lower tailpipe emissions. The same thing is going on in Europe.

But the Wall Street Journal quotes John Mashburn, a senior policy advisor to Trump, as saying:

“The Trump administration will complete a comprehensive review of all federal regulations. This includes the fuel economy and emissions standards to make sure they are not harming consumers or American workers.”

Trump Could Reverse All US Emissions Legislation For Cars

Trump will not only have the Oval Office, but also the Senate and the House of Representatives, both of which are under Republican control. That makes it much easier for him to pass the laws he wants.

An article on Jalopnik claims that Americans simply don’t want smaller, more efficient cars because fuel prices are low. It says that the law is harming manufacturers and costing jobs because they’re being forced to make fewer cars that people won’t choose anyway, instead of lines upon lines of cheaply-made gas-guzzling pickups.

In short, it’s the easy option to relax laws and let car makers pump out as much pollution as they want.

And yet 5.5 million people die worldwide as a result of air pollution. Most deaths are in developing countries but the effects of the deadly toxins within exhaust gases are the same everywhere.

Air pollution (smog) over Los Angeles
Air pollution (smog) over Los Angeles

Michael Brauer of the University of British Columbia in Canada is quoted by the BBC in an article from February 2016 as saying: “The whole population benefits when air quality improves.

“In the US, we know that for every dollar spent on air pollution improvements, we can get between $4-$30 benefit in terms of reduced health impacts.”

Trump seems to have forgotten that it’s not the 1970s any more. It’s no longer the time when American global manufacturing might went unchallenged. Frankly, I don’t want to go back to the ‘70s: the hairstyles were terrible.

Trump Could Reverse All US Emissions Legislation For Cars

But perhaps dear Donald should reflect on a previous US President before making any rash policy moves. It was John F Kennedy who said in his most famous speech:

“We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard; because that goal will serve to organise and measure the best of our energies and skills; because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win.”

Lowering air pollution is hard, and will continue to be hard, but if we’re going to leave this world in a better state than we found it, then JFK’s way has to be our way. If Trump takes the easy route, more people will inevitably die.

Comments

Anonymous

Guys, as much as emissions suck, we’re going to kill the environment if we don’t have them. Look at LA before and after smog regulations - so much better. Do you want to be coughing every 10 seconds or just loose a measly 10 hp? (From Flux (Capacitor)(CamaroSquad) ‘s comment) And for those of you living in Florida or the coastal cities, would you rather be down a few horses or not have a home because it’s underwater? Removing emission regulations is just shooting ourselves in our future self’s feet.

11/10/2016 - 17:49 |
86 | 0
Abraham 6

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

We Floridians are doomed to be underwater soon but if we can stop it then i will be happy to lose a couple of horses (i haz no car so not possible :( )

11/10/2016 - 18:02 |
4 | 2
Anonymous

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

if you could use 2step or antilag on your streer car(for whatever reasons) then you would burn up your cat.

11/10/2016 - 18:26 |
0 | 0
[Flux]

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

THANK YOU. Someone else who knows what’s best for all of us.

11/10/2016 - 18:46 |
17 | 0
Anonymous

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

I live in Miami and I’m happy to say… Let it sink.

11/10/2016 - 23:08 |
10 | 1
Robbie 3

Saying trump has the senate and house of reps is completely wrong. A lot of republicans dont like trump and disagree with a lot of what he says. We’re talking like he controls everything when really he will have eveyone questioning everything he does.

11/10/2016 - 17:49 |
1 | 0
Anonymous

I’ll be honest, I don’t understand any of this. Can somebody simplify?

11/10/2016 - 17:56 |
1 | 1
David 27

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

TLDR;
downsizing can be stopped, cars can get cheaper and such

11/10/2016 - 19:17 |
0 | 0
V-Tech and EcoBoost kicked in yo

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Trump does not believe in climate change, plans on lowering emissions probably. Good for horsepower, bad for environment.

11/10/2016 - 23:28 |
1 | 0
Gites

I wish he would remove some safety laws
I miss the days when cars had visibility and uniqueness to them

11/10/2016 - 18:00 |
2 | 2
V-Tech and EcoBoost kicked in yo

In reply to by Gites

Yeah, who needs to survive a crash.

11/10/2016 - 23:30 |
1 | 1
Anonymous

At least something to like him

11/10/2016 - 18:06 |
2 | 1
V-Tech and EcoBoost kicked in yo

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Not really. Emissions laws exist to make sure future generations don’t have to live with gas masks.

11/10/2016 - 23:30 |
3 | 2
Anonymous

Btw why doesnt he ban the 22 or whatever year import law

11/10/2016 - 18:07 |
0 | 0
Raregliscor1

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Because it isn’t important XD

11/10/2016 - 18:32 |
0 | 0
TheMindGarage

If Trump-induced thermonuclear war doesn’t destroy us, this surely will.

11/10/2016 - 18:12 |
4 | 2
Anonymous

Wait so does this mean we can have the 7.3 PowerStroke back?

11/10/2016 - 18:24 |
3 | 0
Anonymous

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

IDK

11/11/2016 - 01:11 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

good. the debates on things like climate change are completely one sided, its practically impossible to get funding for a study if its not pro climate change ( pro supporting the theory, not pro CC). so much rubbish comes out which is blindly followed and the taxpayer foots the bill. a review of the legislation is long overdue.

11/10/2016 - 18:31 |
2 | 3
Anonymous

F**k trump and
Trump is drump

11/10/2016 - 18:34 |
4 | 4

Topics

Sponsored Posts