Should I or Should I Not Decarbonize a Diesel Engine

My uncle owns a 2011 2.5L Turbo Diesel Ford Everest. It’s been 5 years since he had bought it brand new and only has about 28,000+ kms on it. He told me that he wants to take it to a shop so it could be Chemically Decarbonized. My question is, Should He or Should He Not do it? And what are the Pro’s and Con’s of Decarbonizing a Diesel Engine?

P.S.
There are debates on the net where people say that decarbonizing an engine is good while other people says that it could harm the engine.

Sponsored Posts

Comments

Bartosz (Shine Obsessed)

I would consider this on older diesel. Maybe like 10 years old. My 7 years old 80 k miles had no power loss on the dyno whatsoever. In fact, it showed more than manufacturer said so I see no point in cleaning yours as well.

06/02/2016 - 14:52 |
1 | 0
Rogier

Why would he. If the car does not give any problems…

And deposits are made , I believe, by incomplete combustion. An engine that new/low used does not have leaking piston rings, or other reasons why incomplete combustion would take place.

Save the money for a proper oil change plus filter. All the short rides make water deposits in the oil possible which is WAY worse for your engine than deposits.

06/02/2016 - 19:26 |
1 | 0
MK-07

Thanks guys…. When I told my unlce that he decided not to get a Decarb and just get an Oil Change.

06/06/2016 - 04:42 |
0 | 0