7 Terrible Versions Of Amazing Cars

When a manufacturer builds an incredible car, they'll often offer a number of variants to appeal to a wider audience. Unfortunately, there are occasions where these alternatives ruin everything great about that car
7 Terrible Versions Of Amazing Cars

1. Porsche 996 911 Cabriolet

7 Terrible Versions Of Amazing Cars

There are obviously many good things to say about the Porsche 911, but if you’re an enthusiast you’re probably going to want to stay away from this particular 996.

As it’s the convertible version it’s not quite as dynamically capable as its hard-top equivalent. Couple that with the fact it’s packing a Tiptronic automatic gearbox and you have a rather uninspiring 911 combination - automatic gearboxes aren’t inherently bad, but the Tiptronic is an old-fashioned slushbox rather than a whipcrack-fast double-clutcher.

2. Toyota Supra

Suggested by Taser
Suggested by Taser

In full fat twin-turbocharged mode, the Supra is an absolute animal. It’s a tuner’s dream project, as the 2JZ engine is ripe for more horsepower. The car also came with an entry-level model, which utilised a naturally-aspirated version of the 2JZ inline-six making a fairly healthy 220bhp, but in a relatively heavy car that made it rather gutless.

The Supra also came with a four-speed automatic gearbox option. Couple this to the N/A engine and you’ve got yourself a cheap-to-run, if wholly unexciting, JDM legend.

3. Second-generation Ford Mustang

Suggested by Constandinos Zantis
Suggested by Constandinos Zantis

With the late 60s new car market leaning towards smaller cars, the Mustang was in need of a new look, and it got it thanks to the Ford Pinto. The second-gen Mustang was based on the Blue Oval’s then-new compact car, and some of its uninspiring styling transferred over.

The Mustang has a rich and glorious history, but the second-gen was certainly a bit of a blip - as CTzen Constandinos Zantis pointed out, it “didn’t even have a V8 for several years”, instead packing an inline-four and V6 initially.

4. BMW E46 M3 Cabriolet

7 Terrible Versions Of Amazing Cars

I’ve written about my experiences testing the M3’s different gearboxes before, and the general gist of it is that the SMG is pretty rubbish unless you’re on track, at which point it comes alive. On the flip side, the manual is pretty rubbish unless you’re driving normally. Basically they’re both a bit of a let-down, but I’d be inclined to side with the manual since the vast majority of driving is ‘normal’ driving.

So if the SMG is only good for track use, it wouldn’t make sense to pair it with the less engaging, less lap time-oriented cabriolet variant, right? Exactly, and that’s why the E46 M3 Cabriolet with SMG gearbox is the rubbish variant of an otherwise decent machine.

5. Nissan 240SX

Suggested by Jermaine Directorscut Riley
Suggested by Jermaine Directorscut Riley

There are few cars more legendary in the drift scene than Nissan’s S-chassis. In America, dubbed 240SX, a variant was offered that had an automatic gearbox and an open differential, two things you probably want to avoid when you’re looking to do mad skids.

6. Mazda RX-7

Suggested by NikTheJdmGuy
Suggested by NikTheJdmGuy

The appeal of the Mazda RX-7 is in its lightweight, hardcore, driver-focused approach to driving, and as such it has a lovely manual gearbox. The fizzy rotary engine loves to be revved, and in manual form it’s a joy to smash gears home as you tear up a track.

A four-speed automatic was also offered, and sucked all of the urgency out of proceedings. You’ll still have fun in an auto Rex, but you’ll always feel like the car’s a bit more reluctant to go nuts than its manually shifting companion.

7. Toyota GT86

7 Terrible Versions Of Amazing Cars

It might seem like we’re hating on automatics here, but we’re not. What we are doing is hating on rubbish autos that aren’t worthy of the brilliant cars they’re placed in. The GT86 is a perfect example of this. It’s one of the last remaining routes to affordable rear-wheel drive performance, and its manual shifter is an absolute delight to use - it almost feels as if the shifter is sucked home at the merest suggestion of a gear change.

Unfortunately the auto isn’t quite as good. It takes an age to change gear, is slow to react to your paddle inputs, and if you leave it to its own devices it’ll hold on to gears far longer than can ever be deemed sensible.

Check out all the original suggestions here.

Comments

Anonymous

auto fiat 500 fiminist special edition… something you want to avoid

03/17/2016 - 10:17 |
154 | 3
suchdoge

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

especially with those god awful eye lashes.

03/17/2016 - 13:06 |
9 | 0
Anonymous

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Apparently this Mini Cooper got the same eyelashes too.. found it at the mall :p

03/17/2016 - 14:14 |
33 | 0
Anonymous

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Just avoid Fiat in general.

03/17/2016 - 14:53 |
5 | 20
Anonymous

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

That assumes the Fiat 500 is an amazing car to start with, disregarding the Arbarth

03/17/2016 - 16:57 |
1 | 1
Anonymous

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

I don’t know man, with a turbo it could be fun little sleeper :)

08/31/2016 - 14:29 |
0 | 0
Artur 'The Haferkeks' Kempf

Hell, I’d be happy about any of those

03/17/2016 - 10:21 |
11 | 1
Gabe Scott

I once read an article that several thousand automatic Scion FR-S’s were recalled because the lever would move out of Park.

03/17/2016 - 10:24 |
3 | 0

That seems to happen with Nika (my Mom`s 1996 Sentra EX Saloon), but instead, it clicks into neutral without pressing the button.

03/28/2016 - 10:58 |
1 | 0
gardo_gyula

Nissan Skyline R34 25GT automatic and four door version :(

03/17/2016 - 10:31 |
2 | 3

you could just make the four door ver a sleeper😉😀

03/17/2016 - 10:59 |
0 | 0
  1. Its a skyline which is instant cool.
  2. Its a four door #sleeper
03/17/2016 - 11:13 |
4 | 2

What did you say about my car? The RB25DE NEO is one of the best motors to turbocharge since it has better rise than a 25det and hydraulic lifters that you get with the RB26DETT, and variable cam timing. The R34 GT has the RB20DE which still has the NEO head, but has poor flow.

03/17/2016 - 18:18 |
1 | 0
Anonymous

There’s nothing wrong with a Supra offered in automatic transmission

03/17/2016 - 10:36 |
4 | 5
CheesyBISTO

Something inside me wants a NA Supra that wails all the way to 9000rpm - 300hp of NA straight 6 sounds tasty to me.

03/17/2016 - 10:38 |
42 | 2

The 2JZ-GE engine is rubbish. It has weak internals and it’d cost too much to make it quick

03/17/2016 - 10:47 |
13 | 12

YES!!.

03/17/2016 - 11:40 |
1 | 0

Ever see the one that was 1UZ swapped? It was beautiful.

03/17/2016 - 15:32 |
1 | 0

220* :\

03/17/2016 - 15:34 |
0 | 0

I just read a article up on super street magazine where some guy built a n/a supra with itbs looks bloody lovely

03/17/2016 - 23:31 |
2 | 0
P5 Ford

Actually the 2nd gen mustang was the best body style.. Put a big block in there and it’s a mad drag missile.

03/17/2016 - 10:39 |
0 | 2

But still a very ugly one.
Which works out I guess. Just make it so fast that no one can see it.

03/17/2016 - 10:42 |
4 | 0

The best-looking Mustangs in my opinion were the later 1st Gen ones (1969-ish) with the big, pointy, aggressive fronts on them, then it went to the Pinto shape and seriously, I don’t know how you couldn’t find that disappointing at all…

03/17/2016 - 11:03 |
3 | 0
Anonymous

The Mustang II only did without a V8 in its first year. I’ve written a blog post about it quite some time ago. For the time it was actually a great car, just a terrible Mustang.

03/17/2016 - 10:45 |
3 | 0
Tman5293

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

I was going to say this. The only year the Mustang didn’t have a V8 option was 1974. Every other year in Mustang history had at least one V8 as an option.

03/17/2016 - 12:55 |
1 | 0
Anonymous

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

The thing is as well that they probably didn’t have a v8 because of the fuel crisis of the time?

03/17/2016 - 23:52 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

People hate on the mustang II but I don’t get why when they can be made to look like this. This particular one is a v10

03/20/2016 - 22:07 |
3 | 1
Igor Konuhov

The whole post should’ve been shortened to “automatic transmission”, since it’s the problem described in every one of these

03/17/2016 - 10:46 |
1 | 3
DrivingNirvana (johnmay)

[DELETED]

03/17/2016 - 10:51 |
0 | 0

Topics

Sponsored Posts