The #Ecarnomics of Radar Detectors: Are They Really Worth It?

Speeding tickets might be expensive, but could the technology needed to avoid being caught be even worse on your wallet?

Admit it: you’ve probably wished, at least once in your life, that you had a radar detector in your vehicle. The thought of having some early detection on your side would make you want to love and enjoy your ride that much more. Let’s face it: getting pulled over sucks, and most people want to minimize their chances of that ever happening to them.

Unless you’re lucky enough to get let off with a warning, you’ll probably have to pay a soul-killing fine for going too fast. That money gets used by the police and the government for all sorts of expenses, and the revenues generated from speeding fines can be substantial. What’s more, those fines benefit everyone in society, one way or another, unless you actually have to pay them. So trying to evade the law is essentially akin to stealing from the public.

But let’s say that the people who are most likely to speed decide to go out and buy a fuzzbuster. Obviously, if a lot of people manage to avoid getting caught speeding, the revenues from collecting fines will decrease. Because a lot of those revenues are used to provide government services, the government will have to find a way to get money from somewhere else. This could be in the form of tax increases, licence and registration fee increases, and so on. So you’ll end up saving less money than you may realize.

The #Ecarnomics of Radar Detectors: Are They Really Worth It?

On the subject of saving money, you can’t forget that fuzzbusters are expensive. A bog-standard detector will cost somewhere around $50 USD. Now this may seem cheaper than paying for a speeding ticket, but bear in mind that a cheap radar detector is far from perfect. A lot of cheap radar detectors have a shorter range than the actual radar that police use, which means that you might get busted before you even receive a warning. In that case, you’ve just wasted your money.

You could spend more money on a fuzzbuster, but you’ll likely end up in the neighbourhood of $500 USD once you get into the top-of-the-line models. In that case, you’d have to do a lot of speeding to make the detector pay for itself. If you’re doing that much speeding, you’ll probably be putting more stress on your car, resulting in more hidden expenses. And there’s no guarantee that your expensive machine will work every time, so the risk of getting caught is still present. What’s more, if owning a radar detector is illegal, the fine for getting caught with one can be exorbitant. And, yes, some cops do have radar detector detectors. What’s more, radar detectors usually don’t pick up speed cameras or aircraft patrollers, which makes it much less likely that you’ll want to even speed in the first place.

The #Ecarnomics of Radar Detectors: Are They Really Worth It?

If, on the other hand, you’re still considering buying a fuzzbuster, the math tells us it’s just not worth it. Let’s assume that radar detectors are legal and that the cops can only use radar to catch you speeding. I’ll use what economists call the expected value of savings from purchasing a radar detector. In other words, this value is equal to the cost of a speeding ticket multiplied by the probability that your detector actually works. If you don’t buy a radar detector and obey the speed limit, you’re basically at $0 in savings because you never have to pay for a ticket. If you buy a radar detector and it works every single time, you’re saving on speeding tickets, but you also have to subtract the value of the radar detector. This means that you’d have to do a lot of speeding to get the fuzzbuster to pay for itself.

Now, if you’re only considering getting a $100 unit that, say, works about 60% of the time, here’s what you’ll save: for a $150 speeding ticket, the expected savings is equal to 0.6(+$150) + 0.4(-$150) = $15 in savings for every time you encounter a cop. This means that your radar will have to pick up 7 speed traps before it pays for itself. If you’re unfortunate enough to encounter 7 speed traps and your radar doesn’t pick any of them up, you’re in the hole for $1150. And that’s not even including the value that goes away if you get points on your licence (or even have your licence suspended) as a result of the number of times that your detector lets you down.

But let’s say you still think a radar detector is a good investment. What would happen if you just took that $100 and let it collect interest in the bank? If you want to go really deep into the math and calculate the value of all that compound interest, you’ll basically find out that your thrifty little fuzzbuster isn’t saving you anywhere near as much money as you thought.

Bottom line: it’s simply more sensible to just follow the speed limit. Although fuzzbusters are legal where I live, I don’t own one. And I have never gotten a speeding ticket. That’s a lot of money that I’ve never had to worry about spending. What’s more, it’s also much, much safer for the people around me, especially for tow truck drivers and construction workers. It takes way less mental energy and calculation to just obey the law than to try and figure out the true value of a radar detector.

#ecarnomics

Comments

Joostk26

Rule number 1 don’t get caught

05/08/2017 - 19:05 |
8 | 0
Anonymous

So the hell wrote this article?? Radar detectors are perfectly legal in most states in the U.S for non commercial drivers. I haven driven tens of thousands of miles with two different brands of radar detectors, and been saved from at least a dozen tickets. Most cops will run Ka-band which is very easy for the detector to pick up while you’re still out of sight. In the event a cop is outside the vehicle or parked perpendicular to the road shooting laser, it is still possible to avoid being tagged if you’re in heavy traffic. Plus modern radar detectors use GPS to warn you of frequent speed traps, red light cameras, and speed cameras. Most people would be surprised how often the drive above the speed limit, even just a little. I personally don’t engage in reckless driving, but on some highways 15mph over the speed limit is commonplace. My $200 radar detector has paid for itself numerous times. Not to mention the peace of mind it has given me whenever encountering cops.

05/08/2017 - 19:15 |
82 | 2
Ricky 1

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

I completely agree with you. It all comes down to driving style though. If you drive your Prius 5mph under the speed limit everywhere, than obviously detectors are a waste of money. If going over a speed limit is common grounds for you’re driving style, i bet a good detector will pay for itself within the year!

05/08/2017 - 19:37 |
14 | 0
ModernChaos

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Same here. Where I live in the US here, if you go less than 10 or 15 over, you’ll get people tailgating, flipping you off, speeding around you, etc. 80 in a 65 is very normal, you’ll NEVER see anyone going as slow as 65. I use a radar detector and have been saved probably 10 times already in the last year, just from driving with traffic (not reckless driving by any means). So a $500 radar detector has been very worthwhile for me.

05/08/2017 - 20:22 |
26 | 0
Danny S

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Illegal in Australia.

05/09/2017 - 09:23 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Thank you a useful article from you good sir..

05/18/2017 - 22:28 |
2 | 0
Andrew G.

Then again, buying radar detectors benifits private industry which employs people and provides tax revenue through their profits and induviduals income taxes who work at the company.
Plus my speed limits are set by useless beaurocrats who have no idea what a safe speed is and are motivated by “think of the children” logic. In my state they don’t pull you over unless you do five over anyway due to discrepancies in speedometer accuracy. So a 25 is a 30mph, 45 a 50 mph and so on. If a highway is 55 though or even 65 people will go 65-80 mph and not be bothered. Honestly, the limits should be set by unbiased transportation engineers and with statistics. The limit should not be the median speed, it should be an absolute maximum safe speed considering the average vehicle.

05/08/2017 - 19:18 |
20 | 0

I don’t disagree with anything you’ve said, however a boy at my old school was hit by a car doing 40 in a 20 zone. He ended up with a few broken bones and nothing too serious, but the point still remains that had the driver been doing the speed limit, they would have had more of a chance to avoid an accident altogether. At the end of the day, speed limits are there to protect everyone, and the reason the limites are at the figure they are, is because people who know about that kind of thing have suggested that to be correct.

05/08/2017 - 20:01 |
2 | 8
Rich_WVU

Eh, I can see the argument, but I also know my detector has saved me from at least 8-10 tickets, while it’s only let me down once.

As far as simply slowing down, sure, that’s ideal, but then I didn’t buy 500 horse autobahn missile to be bored.

05/08/2017 - 19:18 |
8 | 0
H5SKB4RU (Returned to CT)

Has a cop written this? Because theres better ways of having fun without speeding and out of cops sight

05/08/2017 - 19:28 |
6 | 0
Ricky 1

Lol this looks like something the government would write to try and convince me not to buy a detector. If you need to bring up the “wear” I am inflicting on my car by speeding, than I’m sorry but thats just Car People Things i guess… Ive been saved plenty of times, not necessarily detectors, but jammers (especially for laser as well) are definitely worth the investment if you ever plan on driving somewhere in a timely manner. Forgive me, but this article does sound a bit petty…

05/08/2017 - 19:34 |
4 | 0
Klockorino

Lol not to mention, newer police radar systems are off until the cop turns it on via button or trigger so the fuzzbuster won’t activate until they already have scanned you.

So it’s not an early warning system as much as a “hey you just got caught bro” device. Which you already know you’re caught when they’re behind you with lights and sirens.

05/08/2017 - 19:52 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

You can’t put a price on having the confidence to speed

05/08/2017 - 20:06 |
2 | 0
Porschephile

Waze isnt bad for traffic cameras and cops and traffic. I’d say get Waze and a good mobile phone plan and you will be good most of the time with Waze.

05/08/2017 - 20:10 |
2 | 0
Jakub Grzybacz

Great article! It’s nice to see that you still continue to write #Ecarnomics posts. Always enjoy reading them. And speaking of radar detectors… I’m not using them for a simple reason - I’m never speeding and so far I haven’t felt that urge to press the gas pedal harder in a 40km/h speed limit zone.
Not only because I got my license only year ago and I don’t ant to lose it. That’s mostly because my current car is an old Opel Corsa and I just wouldn’t like to die in a such boring car. ;-)

PS: I’m not sure if it was you, but anyway - big thanks for EPs on my two blog posts.

05/08/2017 - 21:02 |
2 | 0

Topics

Sponsored Posts