Porsche 718 Boxster Review: Why I've Forgiven It For Losing Two Cylinders

We headed for Lisbon to try out the latest version of the Boxster, to see if it's lost any magic by switching from six to four-cylinder power
Porsche 718 Boxster Review: Why I've Forgiven It For Losing Two Cylinders

At the first twist of the key, I’m probably wearing a look of bemusement on my face. An uneven flat-four clatter fills the underground car park we’re in, and while I can think of many words to describe it, ‘pleasant’ isn’t one of them.

Yep, I’m dealing with the whole engine noise thing straight away. You see, this Porsche 718 Boxster - as it’s now known, to tenuously link it to the 50s/60s four-pot Porsche racing car of the same name - has lost one of the things that made it a truly great sports car: its mid-mounted, naturally-aspirated six-cylinder engine.

Porsche 718 Boxster Review: Why I've Forgiven It For Losing Two Cylinders

The entry-level 2.7-litre version has made way for a 2.0-litre, while the 3.4 has been ousted for a 2.5 in the S - that’s the one we’re sampling, yours for £50,695. Both are flat-fours, and both are turbocharged.

With the dense traffic around Lisbon Portela Airport - where we’ve picked up the cars - easing, I’ve a gap to punt it. With Sport Mode selected on the steering wheel-mounted dial, the exhaust takes on a much lower, boomier character as a bypass valve opens, and with that first prod at full throttle I’m treated to a gruff bark not unlike an old Subaru Impreza. A Subaru Impreza that’s in a bad mood.

Porsche 718 Boxster Review: Why I've Forgiven It For Losing Two Cylinders

This is what everyone has been worried about ever since rumours of Porsche’s turbo four-pot plans for the Boxster and Cayman emerged. Will losing a couple of cylinders and natural aspiration kill the Boxster’s soul?

I’ve not much time to ponder it, as the traffic soon makes way for the coast, and the coast soon makes way for a deliciously twisty bit of road winding its way up into the hills and away from the miserable gridlock. Out here, the Boxster immediately feels at home.

Porsche 718 Boxster Review: Why I've Forgiven It For Losing Two Cylinders

The Boxster’s always been a great thing to drive, but Porsche has worked its hardest to make sure this facelifted version gives the old one a damn good spanking. We have the steering from a Porsche 911 Turbo - 10 per cent quicker than the old set-up, by the way - a rear axle setup created thanks to “learnings from the Cayman GT4 programme” and meatier front brakes lifted straight from the 911 Carrera.

All this and the extra power means the Boxster’s Nurburgring time has been slashed by 16 seconds to a jolly impressive 7min 42 seconds. Want some more figures? It’ll do 0-62mph in 4.2 seconds if you spec the PDK automatic gearbox - a 0.6 second improvement over the old S - and top out at 177mph, all while returning better MPG and puffing out less emissions than before. But out here, I don’t give a damn about willy waving manufacturer ‘Ring times and performance figures. Why? Because I’m having far too much fun.

Porsche 718 Boxster Review: Why I've Forgiven It For Losing Two Cylinders

The Boxster takes everything in its stride and rewards you each time you put faith in its chassis with a wickedly sharp turn in, exquisite balance and bags of grip at the rear, even with the potential for the 718’s more potent mid-range upsetting the now wider rear tyres.

Ah yes, the mid-range. In the old Boxster S you wouldn’t feel peak twist until 4500rpm, but here you get the full output from 1950rpm. You get more of it too, with an extra 44lb ft bringing the total to 310lb ft. It gives the engine a much more muscular, burly feel than the old 3.4, particularly when you factor in the extra power, which is now at 345bhp thanks to a 35bhp boost.

Porsche 718 Boxster Review: Why I've Forgiven It For Losing Two Cylinders

One of the few straight sections of this road gives me a chance to sample that performance, and I’m not left disappointed - the Boxster pulls strongly from about 3000rpm, becoming particularly urgent soon after. Thus far I’ve been shifting up at 6500rpm - where peak power comes in - but since the engine revs to 7500rpm and there’s only four per cent drop off in the 1000rpm after the peak power mark, it’d be rude not to crank it round, surely?

Slipping the improved and beautifully mechanical, short-shifting six-speed manual gearbox into second, I decide it’s about time I smashed into the rev limiter a few times. And lordy, does this 2.5-litre flat-four come alive when you kick it in the nethers. That boomy, industrial nonsense disappears and is replaced by a zingy blare from the two tail pipes, followed by a firing squad-like salvo of small exhaust explosions as I lift off and stab the brakes.

Porsche 718 Boxster Review: Why I've Forgiven It For Losing Two Cylinders

Those strong, progressive 911 stoppers don’t disappoint, although with the weather taking a turn for the worse, it is proving surprisingly easy to lock up under brave/stupid late braking attempts. What’s also impressive is the responsiveness when you stamp your foot back down on the throttle after lifting off, and that’s all to do with a system called Dynamic Boost, which keeps the throttle open for a couple of seconds so the turbo stays spooled up.

The turbo is a special bit of kit, too. The blower on the S uses the 911 Turbo’s Variable Turbine Geometry tech, which at its core features electronically-controlled guide vanes. At low engine speeds these vanes move to a position that gives a very small gap for the exhaust gases to pass through, accelerating them in the process. So, you get the response of a smaller turbo at low RPM, while still getting the impact of a larger turbo at high RPM.

Porsche 718 Boxster Review: Why I've Forgiven It For Losing Two Cylinders

The pity is, I’m not getting much of a chance to bang through the sweet six-speed ‘box, as the Boxster has a Porsche manual gearbox. And Porsche manual gearboxes have ludicrously long cogs. I’m spending most of my time in second gear, only very occasionally sliding into third.

This means I’m experiencing the same dilemma as when I’ve driven other manual Porsches on the road: do I take the really tight stuff in second at a low engine speed, or bang it into first and keep the revs exceptionally high? At the very least here it’s not so bad if you do leave it in first, given the more flexible spread of torque.

Porsche 718 Boxster Review: Why I've Forgiven It For Losing Two Cylinders

With videographer George deposited at the side of the road trying desperately to keep himself and his camera dry, I’m instructed to barrel along the same small segment of road until he waves frantically for me to stop. Fine by me: this gives me the opportunity to attack the same corners over and over, upping the speed a little bit each time to see what this Boxster can do.

It can do a lot. Every single bend is a potent reminder of how a sports car should drive. Amazing stability, a cheeky rear-biased attitude if you push things too far, and sodding brilliant steering. And while we’re on the subject of steering, you get more feedback than you used to. After coming in for a lot of flack for its electric power steering systems, it seems Porsche is getting the hang of the post-hydraulic era.

Remote video URL

After getting back to the hotel and waiting for our transfer back to the airport after many, many hours of driving - taking shelter from the thoroughly soaked outside world that’s now looking like a scene from the Book of Genesis - it should feel like the 718 Boxster has well and truly triumphed. It’s better to drive than ever, seriously fast in S form, is nicely packaged and decent looking in its own understated way. And when it comes to how it drives, none of its rivals - even the feisty Jaguar F-Type - can hold a candle to it.

"The loss of the six-pot Boxster is a tragedy, but Porsche has made up for it in almost every other area"

But now I’m not busy flinging it around a Portuguese mountain road, I’ve time to stop and think, and wonder if I might have enjoyed the day more if the air would have been filled with six cylinders, not four. When you really ring it out, the new 2.5-litre four-banger sounds a hell of a lot more interesting than I was expecting it to, but predictably, it’s just not as joyful to hear as the old 3.4.

Porsche 718 Boxster Review: Why I've Forgiven It For Losing Two Cylinders

The loss of the six-pot Boxster - and the inevitable death of the six-cylinder Cayman, soon to be mechanically identical - is another tragedy in this climate of emissions and economy-led downsizing. But in the case of the 718 Boxster, Porsche has made up for it in almost every other area and created a brilliant roadster in the process.

I’ve forgiven the Boxster for not sounding quite as good as it used to, and you should as well.

Photography by Matt Robinson/George Peck

Comments

Anonymous

Thing is, a new 718 boxter or a used old one? I know what most petrolheads would prefer

04/16/2016 - 08:39 |
1 | 0
Johannes Beutel

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

The old used one only as a GTS, otherwise the new one. Personally I don’t get the whole moaning about downsizing.

04/16/2016 - 09:00 |
5 | 1
Anonymous

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Used boxter and a daily

04/17/2016 - 12:41 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

Still a Coxster
-Jeremy Clarkson

04/16/2016 - 08:51 |
10 | 4
Jarred Lester

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

No, the Coxster is my car…

04/16/2016 - 11:28 |
0 | 0
Joseph Allen Righter

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Coxster is the Cayman

04/16/2016 - 16:36 |
2 | 1
Anonymous

This isnt a porsche

04/16/2016 - 09:30 |
1 | 15
Evan H.

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

ITS A TRAIN!!!

04/16/2016 - 11:27 |
3 | 1
Mattalot

I dont know what turns me on more, the car on the fact its pretty much gota subi engine in it…..

04/16/2016 - 10:32 |
6 | 2

I’m really intrested on the VGT

04/16/2016 - 11:01 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

The reason for the Porsche to have 4 cylinders is for Porsche to have larger profit margins and so to pay for the VW emmisions mess up. I will keep driving my V8 and leave this product behind.

04/16/2016 - 10:45 |
1 | 11
Fantaribo

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

And of course you have proof for that … let me guess, it’s bullshit

04/16/2016 - 10:55 |
3 | 1
Anonymous

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

You think designing an entire new engine from scratch produces more profit than sticking with an older engine?

04/16/2016 - 18:35 |
3 | 0
Anonymous

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

There is no way they could have had the time to decide to design an engine, design it, test it and bring it to market since the diesel emissions scandal surfaced. But I do think the engine is extremely undesirable at this price point, doesn’t suit the car and won’t last long term. They might have even planned it to be some sort of stop gap or temporary model because they named it ‘718 boxster’ not ‘boxster’.

04/18/2016 - 06:16 |
0 | 0
Freddie Skeates

Wouldn’t have thought I’d hear a Porsche go brap brap. Nice article

04/16/2016 - 12:22 |
5 | 0
Outlaw 1

As much as I prefer the flat six, Porsche can do no wrong.

04/16/2016 - 12:45 |
0 | 1
A Gagnon

Why not using à 2,5l turbo flat six???!!!
Keep the sound, keep the emission low…

04/16/2016 - 14:16 |
1 | 0

I was given the answer to that by the powertrain development manager actually! I’ll probably get another post up once I’ve transcribed the interview. To do with complexity, efficiency etc IIRC

04/16/2016 - 15:48 |
1 | 0

I believe the real reason (don’t trust car manufacturers) was to keep it away from the 911. It would have sounded similar to the new turbo Carrera, had the same cylinder count and had a better engine location. Also with the turbo it would have been ‘fast enough’ with the extra torque for a lot of potential 911 buyers which hadn’t been the case before.

04/18/2016 - 06:07 |
0 | 0
ElTamaleroDeSayula

I will keep dreaming about VW making a new rear-engine Beetle with this Porsche engine.

Repeating history, only backwards.

04/16/2016 - 15:06 |
1 | 0

Man I think the same!

04/16/2016 - 23:35 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

Give me one with a PDK please!

04/16/2016 - 15:27 |
0 | 1

Topics

Manufacturers

Sponsored Posts