Trump Could Reverse All US Emissions Legislation For Cars

Love him or loathe him, Donald Trump has got some strong opinions. Among them is that emissions legislation is hurting American competitiveness, and he could be en route to repealing it all
Trump Could Reverse All US Emissions Legislation For Cars

Donald Trump could repeal the legislation forcing manufacturers to produce ever-cleaner cars, potentially causing thousands of deaths due to increased air pollution.

Cars and trucks collectively account for a fifth of all US emissions and both Democrats and Republicans alike have worked to reduce that through laws forcing car makers to lower tailpipe emissions. The same thing is going on in Europe.

But the Wall Street Journal quotes John Mashburn, a senior policy advisor to Trump, as saying:

“The Trump administration will complete a comprehensive review of all federal regulations. This includes the fuel economy and emissions standards to make sure they are not harming consumers or American workers.”

Trump Could Reverse All US Emissions Legislation For Cars

Trump will not only have the Oval Office, but also the Senate and the House of Representatives, both of which are under Republican control. That makes it much easier for him to pass the laws he wants.

An article on Jalopnik claims that Americans simply don’t want smaller, more efficient cars because fuel prices are low. It says that the law is harming manufacturers and costing jobs because they’re being forced to make fewer cars that people won’t choose anyway, instead of lines upon lines of cheaply-made gas-guzzling pickups.

In short, it’s the easy option to relax laws and let car makers pump out as much pollution as they want.

And yet 5.5 million people die worldwide as a result of air pollution. Most deaths are in developing countries but the effects of the deadly toxins within exhaust gases are the same everywhere.

Air pollution (smog) over Los Angeles
Air pollution (smog) over Los Angeles

Michael Brauer of the University of British Columbia in Canada is quoted by the BBC in an article from February 2016 as saying: “The whole population benefits when air quality improves.

“In the US, we know that for every dollar spent on air pollution improvements, we can get between $4-$30 benefit in terms of reduced health impacts.”

Trump seems to have forgotten that it’s not the 1970s any more. It’s no longer the time when American global manufacturing might went unchallenged. Frankly, I don’t want to go back to the ‘70s: the hairstyles were terrible.

Trump Could Reverse All US Emissions Legislation For Cars

But perhaps dear Donald should reflect on a previous US President before making any rash policy moves. It was John F Kennedy who said in his most famous speech:

“We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard; because that goal will serve to organise and measure the best of our energies and skills; because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win.”

Lowering air pollution is hard, and will continue to be hard, but if we’re going to leave this world in a better state than we found it, then JFK’s way has to be our way. If Trump takes the easy route, more people will inevitably die.

Comments

Zwick

Why is politics leaking into car throttle ?!☹️️

11/11/2016 - 01:40 |
2 | 0
King of Contrarians

Maybe we can just get him to let imported cars come in without needing to change their emissions… hint hint… skylines.

11/11/2016 - 02:33 |
2 | 1
Anonymous

Hold up. Car manufactures aren’t going to make lines and lines of cheaply made gas pick ups. What this article doesn’t mention is that these laws are what made car manufactures change a lot of how they made their cars look and how they engineered their engines. For a simple example. Rotaries. 13b’s REW’s (2 rotor engine in the fd3s) were awesome engines. Yes they were unreliable, but the purpose of the car was coming from a sports car view point, and it did just that. Awesome handling, smooth power out of the box. RX7 fd3s’a were only sold in North America in 1994 and 1995 (I may be wrong). After that the rx8 came into the picture with the renisis engine. Which compared to the 13B was complete garbage. The reason is changed was to meet these emission laws. But even then it couldn’t pass the more recent laws. Which is why we haven’t had a rotary powered car in roughly 5 years.
To re-cap these laws won’t nesesarrly mean cheaply made cars, but possibly mean the return of the day’s we miss of higher powered cars at lower costs.

11/11/2016 - 02:58 |
1 | 0
Anonymous

Dear Europeans, as Americans we live in a country where the Environmental Protection Agency attempted to make it illegal to modify any vehicle at all. They wanted you to purchase a vehicle from the factory and that was all that you got. So American automotive enthusiasts are rejoicing that we now have a president elect who wants to minimize government regulation over our hobbies and our industry. (btw, we have a ‘98 cummins diesel at work - 26mpg hwy, and a the same truck that is a ‘13 that gets 13mpg hwy. Please explain how burning twice the fuel is better for the environment?)

11/11/2016 - 03:33 |
2 | 0
Anonymous

Give me a break…

11/11/2016 - 04:04 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

you gonna start getting political on us Car Throttle? You gonna do me like this?

11/11/2016 - 04:43 |
1 | 0
Anonymous

lol everyone says “fuel is cheap” but I can’t be The only one that has noticed the premium gap shoot up. Was $.83 more per gallon yesterday

11/11/2016 - 05:36 |
1 | 0
PapaBruno

Well, i work remotely and rarely ever drive my car, so i guess that’s sorta me doing my part, yeah?

11/11/2016 - 05:40 |
0 | 0
Range Rover (CTthegame tester)

Yessss
Altho im in Czech Republic

11/11/2016 - 06:17 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

Well, maybe he sets the VAG free.

11/11/2016 - 06:58 |
0 | 0

Topics

Sponsored Posts