Was The Grand Tour’s Maserati Destruction Really Necessary?

The Maserati film in the latest Grand Tour episode was enjoyable, but did all the Bi-Turbo killing have to happen?
Was The Grand Tour’s Maserati Destruction Really Necessary?

We’ve touched upon the subject of Clarkson, Hammond and May’s ‘killings’ of modern classic cars before. The motors the trio used - and usually destroyed - for challenges were getting uncomfortably good toward the end of that era of Top Gear, culminating in a Porsche 928, Lotus Esprit and Ford Mustang suffering rather badly on the Patagonia Special, even before the mob intervention.

So, when seeing that the latest episode of The Grand Tour was to going to feature three boxy old Maseratis - one Bi-Turbo and two Bi-Turbo derivatives - I wondered what sort of shape they’d be in by the end of the episode. And with about 5 minutes to go until the end, I was pleasantly surprised.

Was this scene really necessary?
Was this scene really necessary?

Other than a few inevitable scraps and the rubber penis being drilled onto the steering wheel of James’ 430, the cars had actually fared quite well. Until that was, Jeremy’s Bi-Turbo S fell off the back of a recovery van, and James’ then de-penised 430 was shot into the water at “the company yacht”, in what felt like a rather gratuitous scene. And it irked me a little.

Yes, this might seem rich given that I write for a publication that deliberately killed an old Mercedes C-Class by starving of oil recently, but it is (or rather was) a generic mass market car that was already dying when we got hold of it. The Bi-Turbo range might represent a low point in Maserati’s history, but it’s still a Maserati, and an enthusiast car that’s on the verge of dying out.

Was The Grand Tour’s Maserati Destruction Really Necessary?

There are only 22 Bi-Turbos left registered on UK roads according to howmanyleft.com, and just six 430s. Of course we don’t know if any of the Maseratis featured in TGT were already at death’s door (Clarkson’s Bi-Turbo seemed particularly ill at the beginning of the episode), but getting spares for cars like these is usually a nightmare, so at the very least you’d hope for star cars to be fit enough to be used for parts to keep other examples ‘alive’, rather than being in bits at the bottom of the English Channel.

Not long ago I was talking to the owner of one of the last Alfa Romeo 164 Cloverleafs in the country. He told me how it was necessary to buy up any 164 spares he saw regardless of whether or not he needed them at the time, just in case. He’d even had bits shipped over from Japan. That’s what it’s like keeping an ‘endangered species’ of a car alive, and he was understandably miffed to see Top Gear hack a 164 Cloverleaf in half and weld it onto Saab 9000 a few years back.

TGT at least proved that - despite everything - the Bi-Turbo is cool in its own quirky way
TGT at least proved that - despite everything - the Bi-Turbo is cool in…

If any of the owners of the few remaining Bi-Turbos have seen the latest TGT episode, I’m sure they felt the same. Cars may get killed for TV and films all the time, but you’d hope a car-loving show would be a little more sympathetic toward the more special cars it features.

Am I being too precious about this? Should you be able to do what you want with a car you’ve bought, free from the threat of some pedantic bloke on the Internet having a moan? I’m curious to hear your thoughts…

Comments

Anonymous

They destroyed a Bi-turbo on a TG episode about Maserati a long time ago, there is a precedent for this.

01/20/2017 - 19:33 |
10 | 0
DScrye

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

It was the MC12 episode- if I recall correctly, Jezza dropped a dumpster from a crane onto it.

01/20/2017 - 20:22 |
2 | 0
Anonymous

Sounds like another whiney cun t article to make people not watch TGT

01/20/2017 - 19:45 |
20 | 4
H4R1S_01

They destroyed a bi turbo in top gear as well, it’s too sad

01/20/2017 - 19:49 |
0 | 0
Car interested person

spoilers

01/20/2017 - 20:02 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

“The Bi-Turbo got what is deserved because it was an affront to one of the best badges in the business”

wise words said by someone once….

01/20/2017 - 20:11 |
6 | 4
Anonymous

Hmm, the website that has close ties to Rory reid and that other armenian bald guy from TG, are hating on TGT… can I say, salty as **!!!! Dude, the show was fine. It wasnt my personal car, it wasnt yours. You dont own a BiTurbo, you sont have anyone close to you who owns a biturbo. so why dont you, Matt Robinson hop off TG genitals, and review the original Dukes of Hazard, and write about how they destroyed almost half of all Chargers in production.

01/20/2017 - 20:50 |
6 | 6
Anonymous

I think people deserve to know about that happened.
the 430 was mine and they sent 2 people to buy it. It was not supposed to be destroyed, they never said anything about it of course. the car was in correct shape after 3 years spent to save it from death after I bought it in very bad condition.

they could have destroyed tired Biturbos but they chose to destroy at least my good one.

01/20/2017 - 21:01 |
2 | 0
Anonymous

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Biturbo is a piece of junk and if you did not want it to get what it deserves, you should rather keep it than sell it. New owner, his decision… so shut up about your glorified dog dirt and go cry somewhere else ;)

01/23/2017 - 13:27 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

Sad react only

01/20/2017 - 21:30 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

Yes. Stop whining.

01/20/2017 - 22:06 |
2 | 2
Anonymous

Was Carthrottles spoiler of the grand tour really necessary?

01/20/2017 - 22:16 |
14 | 0

Manufacturers

Sponsored Posts