Is There Any Point In Sat Nav Systems Any More?

Since the rise of Google Maps and in-built manufacturer systems, proper standalone sat nav sales have plummeted. But are they now pointless? We got hold of a TomTom Go 61 to find out
Is There Any Point In Sat Nav Systems Any More?

Not so long ago, separate sat-nav systems were the car accessory. No longer did you have to thrust a tatty, potentially out-of-date road atlas in your passenger’s lap, or slap a post-it note on your dash with some vague directions scrawled down: instead, you just suckered a little box with a screen to your dashboard and getting lost became a thing of the past.

Over time they got slimmer, the screens bigger, the technology inside them more intelligent. But, demand for separate sat nav systems has dropped dramatically in recent years. The increasing prevalence of in-built, factory-fitted nav units is a factor, but arguably the biggest reason for the drop is Google Maps and other apps of that ilk. After all, what’s the point in spending over £100 on something your phone can give you for free?

Is There Any Point In Sat Nav Systems Any More?

With that in mind, it’s no surprise to see companies like TomTom forced to diversify with other products, such as the cleverly packaged Bandit action camera we’ve been testing (above). And along with the Bandit, the company sent over its new Go 61, giving us a chance to see if it’s still worth having a separate sat nav.

The first thing you notice is the screen size. At six inches across it’s larger than even the most obnoxiously large smart phones. It’s worth noting the touch screen isn’t quite as responsive as something like an iPhone 6 or Samsung Galaxy S7, but all the menus and sub-menus are nice and easy to navigate. Easier to navigate than the latest systems from Garmin it’s important to note, and without the irritatingly cartoonish colour schemes they seem to be blighted with.

Is There Any Point In Sat Nav Systems Any More?

It strikes a good balance between giving you a reasonable amount of information without barking pointless, repetitive updates at you, and the map is always very easy to follow. It also seems to redirect you quicker than Google Maps and a lot of manufacturer-fit systems manage: if you’ve another route in mind, it’ll pick up on it quicker, rather than shouting at you to turn around for a few miles before working out what you’re up to.

The benefits of a unit like this over a smart phone go further than just screen size, too. The GPS system is better than a phone’s, so it’s highly unlikely you’ll ever have the signal drop. Frequent use of Google Maps is also going to use up a hell of a lot of data if you’re not on an unlimited plan. You will still use some data with the Go 61 if you want to tether it to your phone and get traffic information (there’s no embedded sim card card here), but we’re talking a few megabytes a month rather than hundreds.

The ‘Lifetime’ speed camera information is genuinely very useful and as a bonus can be updated for free - not that I ever speed, officer. Then of course there’s the whole power thing - trying to keep a phone topped up from a 12-volt car socket is never a fun experience when you’ve a navigation app annihilating the battery.

Is There Any Point In Sat Nav Systems Any More?

So, is all that enough to make one of these things worth buying? It’s not a simple yes or no - it depends entirely upon your circumstances. For the occasional use, it’s quite hard to justify a system like this - the sim-less Go 61 is more of an entry-level nav but it’s still £169.99. For a lot of people, Google Maps and other free apps will do the job just fine, and the benefits of a standalone system aren’t going to be enough to warrant the outlay.

However, if your own car doesn’t have in-built navigation - or you own a car with one that’s irritatingly useless - and you rack up a lot of miles going to unfamiliar destinations - there is something to be said for these things. You’ll soon find it’ll become a trusted travel companion. And if you are going to buy one, the TomTom Go 61 looks to be a damn good choice.

Comments

Stegosaurus

I used, what is essentially, the older version of this Sat-Nav to go from the UK, to the CTMeet in Germany, and it was super simple to use, very informative and updated regularly to take us around the worst of the Rush Hour traffic in Brussels.

05/07/2016 - 09:42 |
2 | 0
Jelle Dik

The problem I have with build in navigation is that you cant update maps, atleast in the golf.
In the netherlands the roads change a lot, and I had one free update which I already used. So I rather use waze, which I use daily. here data isn’t that expensive I have 1500mb per month for 8 euro.

05/07/2016 - 09:45 |
0 | 0
brandomr26

You won’t believe me, but I still use my Nokia N95 8GB for car navigation! I have an Asus Zenfone 2 with 4gb of ram and HERE maps installed, but it’s nothing compared to the old but updated system in my still working nokia. Here is a pic I’ve taken right now :)

05/07/2016 - 09:50 |
72 | 0

I also used to have one of these beasts with the great navigation system. Ah, memories.

05/07/2016 - 11:07 |
10 | 0

So true brando! Nokia has still the best maps

05/07/2016 - 11:13 |
2 | 0

Nokia should have continued making those kind of phone and not start to make those hideous lumia phones.

05/07/2016 - 11:53 |
26 | 0

I also had this phone. It was a beast. Mine didnt survive though. :/

05/07/2016 - 19:52 |
0 | 0

Pretty neat! I had Nokia C5 5MP (5MP model is supposed upgrade RAM and camera) was great using gps until bought secondary Sony Ericsson K850i (they’re useful rooting and tweaking camera software)
Manys years later had use Sony Ericsson xperia Arc S was amazing camera and panorama…
then now currently using Sony Xperia SP is great useful GPS via app TomTom (yes it’s free app and limited 75km travel per month but you have to pay subscriptions 1 to 3 year)
From now i am waiting Sony Xperia X Performance! (Reason to why i skipped Sony Z series; they’re back panel are glass and little outdated software seem like my old phones.)

05/08/2016 - 14:30 |
2 | 0
Anonymous

Don’t use Google Maps as a GPS. It has sent me to wrong places many times.

05/07/2016 - 09:58 |
16 | 2
Anonymous

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

I 100% agree with this statement.

05/07/2016 - 11:08 |
6 | 2
Ben Anderson 1

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

HERE Maps is so much better.

05/07/2016 - 15:34 |
6 | 0
Piratek

I am using Sygic navigation, it is great… you have offline maps, you can get speed camera updates as you drive, which is nice.
What do you guys prefer to use?

05/07/2016 - 11:04 |
0 | 0
Matt Robinson
Matt Robinson

In reply to by Piratek

Used Cygic on a launch in Lisbon once. Was OK but it got itself confused a few times, and I wanted to punch it every time it called a roundabout a ‘traffic circle’…

05/07/2016 - 21:31 |
2 | 0
Arno

Just use a map. A real one, you know, the ones made out of paper.

05/07/2016 - 11:30 |
2 | 2
Matt Robinson
Matt Robinson

In reply to by Arno

Not much use if you don’t have a passenger to read it, though!

05/07/2016 - 21:32 |
2 | 0
DL🏁

Thankfully, my VW Golf has a brilliant sat nav system. And it has even bigger screen and gives some directions on the dash as well (e.g. what lane is best to use and when to turn and what is the speed limit etc). Never felt a need in using an app or separate device.

05/07/2016 - 11:34 |
0 | 0
icebreakertech

Get a navigation system with free map updates or use waze. Build in system are always out of date and cost a lot to update. €250 for VW or Audi…Main problem with using my phone is data usage.

05/07/2016 - 11:46 |
0 | 0
The white comet of Akagi

“if your own car doesnt have in-built navigation - or you own a volvo”*

05/07/2016 - 13:19 |
0 | 0
DeLeon

Yes they are useful. My MX5 doesnt have a built in SatNav (obviously) and I dont want to use all my mobile data for navigation and well, it needs a lot of battery when you use navigation on your phone ^^

05/07/2016 - 13:26 |
0 | 0

Topics

Sponsored Posts