Switching To Electric Cars Isn't Going To Be Enough To Save The Planet, But Don't Let That Stop You

When the anticipated expansion of the Asian middle classes hits, petrol car ownership will soar and emissions will skyrocket, outmatching any savings made in the West. But that doesn't mean we shouldn't go electric anyway
Switching To Electric Cars Isn't Going To Be Enough To Save The Planet, But Don't Let That Stop You

You’re probably wondering whether we’ve gone half-mad, but then again, maybe you’re not.

Electric cars are going to become a reality for a lot more of us over the next 10 years or so, and after that the avalanche will start. In 20 years it might be that most of us have electric daily drivers. But for all our environmental conscience in the West, certain American leaders excepted, it’s not going to stop global warming.

When the Asian markets finally tip over the edge of the precipice into the rapid expansion of the middle classes, car purchases are going to go through the roof. As happened in Europe and the US during the post-War period, economies grew and people got richer. They bought cars, bigger houses and started going on holidays abroad.

Switching To Electric Cars Isn't Going To Be Enough To Save The Planet, But Don't Let That Stop You

The same is going to happen across Asia as surely as the sun is to rise in the east tomorrow. We’re already warming the planet worryingly quickly, according to actual science (as opposed to alternative science), so an explosion of new, basic, cheap, inefficient cars in countries with a combined total of several billion people is not going to do anyone any favours. This problem isn’t localised: if the global atmosphere suffers, we all suffer.

Oil giant BP this week predicted that global oil demand would still be growing in 2035. “It’s not Teslas and the US. It’s the fact that 2 billion people, much of that in Asia, are moving to middle incomes, can buy their first motor car and that drives up oil demand. It’s that stuff that really matters,” said Spencer Dale, BP group’s chief economist.

Switching To Electric Cars Isn't Going To Be Enough To Save The Planet, But Don't Let That Stop You

It gets worse. In fact, the company expects that demand for oil won’t peak until 10 years later, sometime in the mid-2040s. Greenpeace was furious, naturally. Why should BP be realistic when instead they should be blindly insisting that we’ll all be in Nissan Leafs by March?

Anyway, the fact is that, barring something world-changing, Asia is about to start burning so much fuel that it’ll make today’s American consumption look like a quick sip at the global oil well. But that’s exactly why the rest of us need to start taking action to offset that as much as we can. Investing in cleaner technologies, renewable energy and zero-emission cars is something we shouldn’t be fighting, or disputing the merits thereof. It’s something we should be accelerating.

Switching To Electric Cars Isn't Going To Be Enough To Save The Planet, But Don't Let That Stop You

Don’t get me wrong. I don’t want internal combustion banned (ever), and I don’t want today’s cars to be legislated off the road with excess taxation or fuel costs. I want us to be free to continue to enjoy the fruits of suck-squeeze-bang-blow for the rest of time, if we want to. But it’s surely beyond reasonable argument that we need to stop burning vast quantities of stuff that’s not exactly very good for the planet. Using our glorious V8s a bit less wouldn’t hurt, would it? Using the plug-in ecobox in the week and then taking our pride and joy out at the weekend would be the best of both worlds, right?

Some people will argue that Asian growth makes Western environmentalism pointless, but that same growth is the exact reason we need to take global warming more seriously, working in whatever ways we can to offset the rampant consumption in the East. And, by proxy, that means we need to start taking electric cars more seriously. Far from this being the end of the world as we know it, we might just help preserve it for our grandkids.

Comments

Ryan Conley

I’m not saying that’s it’s not a good thing that most of the world is pushing for cleaner energy.. but you have to get the whole world on board if you actually want to make a difference. A minimum gain is Europe would be offset by Asian countries. Here in the US, 66% of our energy production is still from coal and natural gas. We need to accelerate renewables like solar energy before pushing every one to buy and electric car

01/28/2017 - 15:05 |
7 | 0

Agreed. Cars are always the one thing that has to go greener but meanwhile all the factory’s keep on pumping all sorts of stuff into the air and nobody cares.

01/28/2017 - 15:19 |
4 | 0
Seth 3
01/28/2017 - 16:14 |
1 | 2
Anonymous

Why don’t we just LS swap everything…….. Problem solved

01/28/2017 - 16:57 |
2 | 1
Anonymous

“We’re already warming the planet worryingly quickly, according to actual science (as opposed to alternative science)”

the “actual” science has been completely wrong for a long time now:

https://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/working-paper-35_2.pdf

its this kind of arrogance which is pushing people away from caring about climate change, maybe if you actually engaged with the people presenting science which goes against the narrative you would find that they have a point or vice versa. but no, carry on talking down to people who disagree with you.

01/28/2017 - 17:02 |
1 | 1
Anonymous

No, oil demand will not grow in 2035. Gas will be used with the GTL process. Much better CO2 emissions and enough for another 150years. Oil and gas is more and more difficult to get and the land scarring that you see mostly in the US is simply horrible.

01/28/2017 - 17:09 |
1 | 0
Anonymous

But China has wider EV adoption than any other country.

01/28/2017 - 17:13 |
1 | 0
Anonymous

What if this growth in middle class signs with the tipping point of lower cost electric vehicles. I wouldn’t take BP’s report as reliable, rather an unbiased study. I would also like to see comparison studies that say electric cars and batteries generate equal pollution to combustion. Centralized energy production vs mini portable energy production must be much more efficient

01/28/2017 - 17:36 |
2 | 0
Anonymous

A lot of people are quick to point out that electric cars still require burning of fuels in powerstations…. However consider the waste in transporting millions of gallons of fuel accross continents to get to your fuel pump. Then consider that generators and power stations are far more efficient at recovery of energy from fuel because they don’t have to cycle through revs and can maintain optimum efficiency at all times.
Electricity can also be transported and even exported through inter country super connectors with minimal waste and can be produced from unrefined fuels again saving more energy.
There are energy savings all over the chain of supply before it even makes it to your car

01/28/2017 - 18:26 |
2 | 0
Anonymous

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Exactly!

01/30/2017 - 15:02 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

Living in India, I was about to type here that this post is putting asia on a bad pedestal..
But unfortunately this post speaks the truth..
The sad but inevitable truth.

01/28/2017 - 18:53 |
1 | 0
Anonymous

The United States Space Force can spray sun block into the upper atmosphere to cool the planet.

01/28/2017 - 18:56 |
2 | 2

Topics

Sponsored Posts