Autonomous Car Drivers Could Face A Mid-Journey Distraction Ban

Drivers of autonomous cars could be banned from doing any other tasks, like reading, even while the car is driving itself, according to researchers
Autonomous Car Drivers Could Face A Mid-Journey Distraction Ban

One of the main advantages of autonomous cars could be wiped out, if a new study’s recommendations are adopted into law.

‘Autonomous vehicle consortium’ Venturer has issued advice that all owners of such cars might have to be banned from carrying out any other tasks while the car is in control. That means we could kiss goodbye to the idea of reading, studying, eating or watching Alex’s latest CT videos while the car is driving.

Remote video URL

To clarify, if these recommendations were made law, you would simply have to sit there and attempt to concentrate on safety. As we discovered in the Uber crash that killed a homeless woman, human attention wanders when it isn’t put under specific demands.

This would remove one of the chief benefits of having an autonomous car in the first place. Being able to use your time more productively is essential to the core appeal of the concept. Not everyone is as bothered about the relative safety benefits as certain campaign groups might like to make out, and selling self-driving cars on that basis alone won’t be enough.

Autonomous Car Drivers Could Face A Mid-Journey Distraction Ban

Venturer’s research suggests that autonomous car ‘drivers’ need around two seconds to regain full control of the car after a warning was sounded. At 50mph that means 45 metres travelled with the car effectively in limbo.

Professor Sarah Sharples, the snappily-titled Associate Faculty Pro-Vice-Chancellor for Research and Knowledge Exchange and Professor of Human Factors at the University of Nottingham, was part of the study. She said:

“It is… important to understand the implications of increased autonomy on the capability of humans to maintain vigilance and attention in order to be able to respond to an emergency situation.

“It may also be necessary for the rollout of highly autonomous vehicles to be accompanied with the advice – or even law – that in some or all circumstances the driver must maintain attention to the driver situation and that other activities should be minimised or avoided.”

Autonomous Car Drivers Could Face A Mid-Journey Distraction Ban

Reading between the lines, this would put the accident liability onus firmly onto the human rather than the software engineers at car makers. In turn, it would mean that drivers simply couldn’t afford to take their eyes off the road just in case there’s a glitch in the programme. That sounds even more stressful than driving can already get…

Source: Auto Express

Comments

Anonymous

All I can say is ‘good’. Pointless tech unless I can ‘drive’ home from the pub while drunk

04/17/2018 - 14:14 |
5 | 0
SAVAGE DOGG (Ping-Pong Gang) (Corvette Squad)

Way to make more people fall asleep behind the wheel…

04/17/2018 - 14:46 |
2 | 0
TheBagel

That won’t work. You don’t have anything to do but sit and look out. We only have attention spans of like 8 seconds , and after that we’re in la la land.

04/17/2018 - 15:14 |
2 | 0
TheMindGarage

This is exactly why autonomous tech is so dangerous. People don’t know and respect its limitations. The minute a level 3 system rolls out, people are like “OH MY GAWD IT’S SELF-DRIVING!!!”. No, it’s just glorified lane assist. It will drive itself fine as long as it doesn’t detect anything strange, but the instant it can’t cope, you’ve got to be ready to take back control. The only people that watch the road that closely when being driven are driving instructors.

04/17/2018 - 15:58 |
6 | 0

Exactly. People fail to understand the technology and will simply jump into the car, thinking that the system is 100% reliable and trustworthy.

Until level 5 systems are properly developed, authorities should probably focus on making driving tests stricter and improving driver standards.

04/17/2018 - 17:15 |
3 | 0
Jakob

It may also be necessary for the rollout of highly autonomous vehicles to be accompanied with the advice – or even law – that in some or all circumstances the driver must maintain attention to the driver situation and that other activities should be minimised or avoided.

You mean, like, the entire road traffic regulations? That whole law book only revolves around the basic rule of thumb to always pay attention to the road and to the traffic. If you are behind the steering wheel (even if the car is driving itself!), you are responsible for what your vehicle does.

04/17/2018 - 17:13 |
2 | 0
slo4dr

Whats the point then?

04/17/2018 - 18:44 |
1 | 0
RodriguezRacer456 (Aventador SV) (Lambo Squad)

Car guys:

04/17/2018 - 19:49 |
3 | 0
Anonymous

What’s the point? If you have to focus on the driving, why bother it drive itself even though you still have to be occupied.

04/17/2018 - 21:40 |
1 | 0
Anonymous

This is pointless. Cars should be fully autonomous with no steering wheel or a “driver” car IMO. The idea that someone can suddenly take control in an emergency situation and react appropriately in milliseconds is laughable.

04/17/2018 - 22:15 |
1 | 0
Anonymous

ok so then don’t make self driving cars.

04/18/2018 - 03:29 |
1 | 0

Topics

Sponsored Posts