7 Terrible Versions Of Amazing Cars

When a manufacturer builds an incredible car, they'll often offer a number of variants to appeal to a wider audience. Unfortunately, there are occasions where these alternatives ruin everything great about that car
7 Terrible Versions Of Amazing Cars

1. Porsche 996 911 Cabriolet

7 Terrible Versions Of Amazing Cars

There are obviously many good things to say about the Porsche 911, but if you’re an enthusiast you’re probably going to want to stay away from this particular 996.

As it’s the convertible version it’s not quite as dynamically capable as its hard-top equivalent. Couple that with the fact it’s packing a Tiptronic automatic gearbox and you have a rather uninspiring 911 combination - automatic gearboxes aren’t inherently bad, but the Tiptronic is an old-fashioned slushbox rather than a whipcrack-fast double-clutcher.

2. Toyota Supra

Suggested by Taser
Suggested by Taser

In full fat twin-turbocharged mode, the Supra is an absolute animal. It’s a tuner’s dream project, as the 2JZ engine is ripe for more horsepower. The car also came with an entry-level model, which utilised a naturally-aspirated version of the 2JZ inline-six making a fairly healthy 220bhp, but in a relatively heavy car that made it rather gutless.

The Supra also came with a four-speed automatic gearbox option. Couple this to the N/A engine and you’ve got yourself a cheap-to-run, if wholly unexciting, JDM legend.

3. Second-generation Ford Mustang

Suggested by Constandinos Zantis
Suggested by Constandinos Zantis

With the late 60s new car market leaning towards smaller cars, the Mustang was in need of a new look, and it got it thanks to the Ford Pinto. The second-gen Mustang was based on the Blue Oval’s then-new compact car, and some of its uninspiring styling transferred over.

The Mustang has a rich and glorious history, but the second-gen was certainly a bit of a blip - as CTzen Constandinos Zantis pointed out, it “didn’t even have a V8 for several years”, instead packing an inline-four and V6 initially.

4. BMW E46 M3 Cabriolet

7 Terrible Versions Of Amazing Cars

I’ve written about my experiences testing the M3’s different gearboxes before, and the general gist of it is that the SMG is pretty rubbish unless you’re on track, at which point it comes alive. On the flip side, the manual is pretty rubbish unless you’re driving normally. Basically they’re both a bit of a let-down, but I’d be inclined to side with the manual since the vast majority of driving is ‘normal’ driving.

So if the SMG is only good for track use, it wouldn’t make sense to pair it with the less engaging, less lap time-oriented cabriolet variant, right? Exactly, and that’s why the E46 M3 Cabriolet with SMG gearbox is the rubbish variant of an otherwise decent machine.

5. Nissan 240SX

Suggested by Jermaine Directorscut Riley
Suggested by Jermaine Directorscut Riley

There are few cars more legendary in the drift scene than Nissan’s S-chassis. In America, dubbed 240SX, a variant was offered that had an automatic gearbox and an open differential, two things you probably want to avoid when you’re looking to do mad skids.

6. Mazda RX-7

Suggested by NikTheJdmGuy
Suggested by NikTheJdmGuy

The appeal of the Mazda RX-7 is in its lightweight, hardcore, driver-focused approach to driving, and as such it has a lovely manual gearbox. The fizzy rotary engine loves to be revved, and in manual form it’s a joy to smash gears home as you tear up a track.

A four-speed automatic was also offered, and sucked all of the urgency out of proceedings. You’ll still have fun in an auto Rex, but you’ll always feel like the car’s a bit more reluctant to go nuts than its manually shifting companion.

7. Toyota GT86

7 Terrible Versions Of Amazing Cars

It might seem like we’re hating on automatics here, but we’re not. What we are doing is hating on rubbish autos that aren’t worthy of the brilliant cars they’re placed in. The GT86 is a perfect example of this. It’s one of the last remaining routes to affordable rear-wheel drive performance, and its manual shifter is an absolute delight to use - it almost feels as if the shifter is sucked home at the merest suggestion of a gear change.

Unfortunately the auto isn’t quite as good. It takes an age to change gear, is slow to react to your paddle inputs, and if you leave it to its own devices it’ll hold on to gears far longer than can ever be deemed sensible.

Check out all the original suggestions here.

Comments

Wawa Iki

So the conclusion is these cars suck because of autotragic transmission

03/17/2016 - 15:31 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

You say that like an auto and an open diff were the worst things to come in the 240…not mentioning the n/a ka24de, which in stock form is pretty gutless

03/17/2016 - 15:39 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

240sx with an automatic, open diff and KA24de…….. Poor usdm xD

03/17/2016 - 16:03 |
0 | 0
Aaron 15

It’s just a hate fest on auto gearboxes as far as I’m concerned

03/17/2016 - 16:19 |
0 | 0
Logan Mince

Chevrolet Colorado with a 4L60E

03/17/2016 - 16:28 |
0 | 0
Cole Reich

seems like i’ve been doing alot of defending of the mustang II for a while, but i got to try… anyways, it DID come with a v8 for several years, it was only offered without a v8 for the first model year, 1974. from 75-78, they came with them.even then, it never came with anything packing more than 140 horses.. given some light detail work; getting those fugly bumpers out of the way, getting rid of the plastic “egg-crate” grille, and moving the front signal lights into the bumper, they look fine… if it hadn’t been produced, the mustang could’ve turned into a luxury boat or gone away all together..

03/17/2016 - 16:44 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

You can swap the gearbox. I think it would be cheaper buy an automatic supra and swap the transmission. And about the 240sx, if you plan to buy this only for drift, just weld the differential…

03/17/2016 - 17:05 |
0 | 0
ALuKa

Another automatic hater …. lol

03/17/2016 - 17:59 |
0 | 0
nandee

In reply to by ALuKa

Well, those old automatics are not meant for performance cars, newer dual clutches are fast, but neither the Supra, nor the BMW came with them.

03/17/2016 - 19:29 |
1 | 0
Soarer-Dom

Should have swapped the Supra for the R32 Skyline GXi - it has an n/a 4 cylinder CA18 barely scraping 100hp. And it only came in 4-door, meaning it’s basically a Nissan Pintara with a smaller motor.

03/17/2016 - 18:13 |
0 | 0

Why? The Skylines have base models too. The GT-R and stuff ist just a beefed up Version of the good old family car, the Nissan Skyline

03/17/2016 - 19:40 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

you had me at mad skids..

03/17/2016 - 18:26 |
0 | 0

Topics

Sponsored Posts