Uber's Autonomous Car Detected The Pedestrian It Hit, Decided Not To Act

A new report claims that Uber's autonomous car prototype actually detected the pedestrian it hit and killed, but ignored the information
Uber's Autonomous Car Detected The Pedestrian It Hit, Decided Not To Act

A month and a half ago, a pedestrian was tragically killed by one of Uber’s Volvo XC90-based autonomous test cars. Now, we’re getting a better idea of what went wrong on 18 March.

According to a new report in The Information, the prototype vehicle’s software did actually spot 49-year-old Elaine Herzberg as she crossed the road in Tempe, Arizona, but decided not to act.

Uber's Autonomous Car Detected The Pedestrian It Hit, Decided Not To Act

Citing “two people briefed about the matter,” the publication reports that Herzberg was identified as a ‘false positive’. It’s deliberately built in to the system to ignore objects like litter in the road, so it does not brake or take evasive action unnecessarily. So while Herzberg was indeed ‘spotted’, she was not correctly classified by the system, and as a result, the car carried on regardless. Subsequently released footage also revealed that the human ‘operator’ of the car was looking down at the time of the accident.

Uber has so far refused to comment, owing to the current National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) investigation into the accident. The company suspended its testing programme immediately after the fatal incident in March.

Comments

maurotehsilva

I remember a similar event from last week. (I know I posted this as a meme post but it is relevant thanks to Waymo being smug)

05/08/2018 - 14:22 |
0 | 2

bit harsh on waymo, look at the video the other car came from nowhere after running a red and jumping the central curb!

05/08/2018 - 16:49 |
1 | 0
Facus

When even computers get road rage

05/08/2018 - 14:41 |
0 | 0
clean_si_drty_yata

So you’re saying the computer called the woman trash and THEN ran her over?????

05/08/2018 - 17:21 |
4 | 1
Anonymous

Useless tech

05/08/2018 - 17:57 |
2 | 1
Anonymous

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Indeed.

05/08/2018 - 18:41 |
3 | 1
Anonymous

A system that is taking baby steps, which cannot make a difference between a paper bag and a grown up, is allowed to join traffic. That is the real problem.

05/08/2018 - 18:51 |
0 | 1
HAYABUSA

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Except it’s not. Had the driver actually done his job then maybe the accident would not have happened

05/08/2018 - 19:00 |
2 | 0
Anonymous

Considering its in testing the human driver should be paying attention at all times for gods sake

05/09/2018 - 07:13 |
0 | 0
Ranbir Singh

This news isn’t really that big. This felt pretty obvious from the beginning. With all the systems the cars have that aren’t dependent of visible light, it would be expected that it had seen her, but then not realised that it was in fact a person, I reckon.

05/09/2018 - 08:38 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

This is scary since i just finished reading Dan Brown Origin!

05/12/2018 - 19:48 |
0 | 0

Topics

Sponsored Posts