Convertible Supercars: Why Do We Pretend To Hate Them?

Whenever a convertible supercar emerges, it's slower, heavier and - on paper - measurably less good than its coupe sibling... but do we really think they're worse?
Convertible Supercars: Why Do We Pretend To Hate Them?

Convertible supercars: possibly the source of our greatest hypocrisy. On paper we prefer to shun them, to turn our noses up while mumbling words like ‘posers,’ ‘weight penalty’ and ‘handling.’ If the coupe is a stylish luxury hotel in Paris, the convertible is a neon-lit beachfront bar in Magaluf.

Earlier this week we brought you news that Porsche is cooking up something that, while it’s called the Speedster, seems a lot like a convertible GT3. Think 493bhp flat-six, rear-wheel drive, even a manual gearbox – plus unlimited headroom. But, as we always end up saying whenever this sort of thing happens, it inevitably won’t drive quite as well as the hard-top.

Convertible Supercars: Why Do We Pretend To Hate Them?

The extra weight involved in bracing the chassis after removing the roof is the arch-enemy of performance and handling. Scuttle shake is nowhere near what it used to be in the days of Saab 900 convertibles and Citroen C3 Pluriels (shudder) but it’s usually noticeable in anything that wasn’t designed to live without a roof in the first place, like a McLaren.

That extra flab can show itself on track, bringing the limits down a fraction, or making the steering feel a tad more dim-witted. Even on the road the convertible version often just feels a little… flat compared to the hard-top.

The exact Porsche 911 I failed to enjoy
The exact Porsche 911 I failed to enjoy

Porsche’s 911 is a perfect example. I once drove a current-era S Cabriolet from the south coast of Wales to the north coast in a day. It left me completely cold. I didn’t engage with it at all, but the weather was crap (obviously) and the roof spent 90 per cent of the time keeping rain off my head. There was loads of grip, but it just didn’t feel very engaging.

A month or two later I drove a Poundland-basic Carrera coupe and absolutely fell in love with it. It felt lithe, alert and so much more enjoyable. It’s that spark of life that nothing but low weight can really bring.

Convertible Supercars: Why Do We Pretend To Hate Them?

On the other hand, I’ve also driven both the hard top and Roadster versions of the Lamborghini Aventador. The Roadster, for all our mutterings about posing pouches and new money, is absolutely 100 per cent the one I’d have. The same goes for the McLaren 650S, of which I drove both styles, and the Ferrari 458. I’ll have the Spiders, thanks. Audi R8? Yep, driven both, and mine’s a Spyder.

What we’re sometimes guilty of when writing about these things is forgetting the real value of the extra theatre afforded by an open roof. Sure, you have to pay £10,000-£15,000 more for the roof delete option, but it’s that louder, more visceral experience that grabs you by the nerve endings and shakes you like an industrial paint mixer. It’s the reason we always come away from open-top supercar drives knowing that we’d have that one.

Convertible Supercars: Why Do We Pretend To Hate Them?

At the end of the day, neon-lit beachfront bars in Magaluf aren’t really our thing at all, but as much as we hate to admit it, that doesn’t mean they aren’t often very good fun.

Comments

Anonymous

I’d have a Targa over a coupé any day, because they look as good as the coupé with the benefits of a removable roof

04/16/2018 - 02:16 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

my hatred of convertibles is not pretend though….

04/16/2018 - 04:45 |
2 | 0
Joel Brennan

Honestly though, with most convertible supercars these days, the driving quality is hardly affected. Supercars are all about drama and panache, and a supercar without a roof has more of both of those. There’s more noise, more exposure to the elements, and it’s more fun. And again, how many people who buy something like an R8, 911, or Ferrari are driving it really hard and being as focused as possible? I’ve NEVER seen any of those cars reach even 85 mph even when I was in them. The truth of the matter is that convertible and regular supercars are driven in almost the same style: not very fast or aggressive. Why not add “more noise” to a car? It’s better that way.

04/16/2018 - 15:36 |
0 | 0
eXoZGaming

the removable hardtops are better to me then the robotic self takeoff. idk if those versions make it much heavier, but i know its lighter n less expensive then the robot

04/16/2018 - 17:46 |
0 | 0
MR-2

The only thing i like about convertibles is that i can fit in one.

04/17/2018 - 09:55 |
4 | 0
Anonymous

In reply to by MR-2

How tall are you?

04/17/2018 - 16:48 |
0 | 0
Chris D.

I’ve always loved convertible supercars. Just the thought of driving through the coast of Santa Barbara in an R8 Spyder while blasting Van Halen just really appeals to me.

04/17/2018 - 21:06 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

The whole thing that convertibles are slower and less rigid on track is ridiculous. If it’s a bloody supercar, it’s going to be fast, convertible or not. If you’re doing honest to god competitive driving, maybe that little bit of rigidity will make a difference but for having fun on the weekend, you’re not going to care.

04/18/2018 - 13:32 |
8 | 0
sportscars_no

The only reason as to why i dislike them is because they are mostly soft tops.

04/19/2018 - 08:16 |
0 | 0

Topics

Sponsored Posts