The US Is Planning Lower Fuel Economy Targets

In a move designed to appeal to older and more nationalistic voters, President Donald Trump's administration is set to lower the future efficiency targets for cars - while everyone else is raising them
The US Is Planning Lower Fuel Economy Targets

The US has begun the process of relaxing fuel economy standards to make it easier for manufacturers to meet the rules, and as you can imagine, it’s pretty controversial.

While European and Japanese legislators are tightening the rules to force manufacturers to keep innovating and designing cleaner combustion, America is taking a different route, choosing to ignore studies suggesting that cutting emissions could prevent over 200,000 annual premature US deaths that are linked to air quality.

The American automotive industry asked President Trump almost immediately after his inauguration to reverse the promises they had been forced to make by the Obama administration, as part of its drive to reduce emissions and push the industry to develop and use cleaner technology solutions.

The US Is Planning Lower Fuel Economy Targets

Trump’s government has now opened a process of inviting public comment on the subject, despite it being widely reported as being just a case of jumping through legal hoops before the fuel economy and emissions rules are actually relaxed.

As recently as January this year, the EPA – a known ‘enemy’ of the current administration’s – had tried to ‘lock-in’ the rules so that they couldn’t be changed before 2025. That means a target of 54.5 US miles per gallon by that point, which is no easy feat for an industry that thrives on pickups and SUVs.

Now, though, as Donald Trump seeks to make it easier for American car makers, it looks increasingly likely that the target will be lowered. The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, which includes Toyota, General Motors and Volkswagen, is urging the government to make it happen, because for them it means lower costs and higher short-term profits.

The US Is Planning Lower Fuel Economy Targets

Meanwhile, plenty of opponents of the proposed move, like the Yale School of Forestry and Environment Studies, say it won’t save auto industry jobs – but will mean increased air pollution. There is, they claim, no evidence to suggest emissions laws have cost American jobs.

Of course, rolling-back efficiency targets also means that the American car industry will be allowed to fall behind its equivalents in Europe and Japan as technology advances. Toyota and Volkswagen will be developing advanced solutions in their other markets anyway, but the danger is that American brands that focus almost totally on North America could soon realise that they’re technologically outgunned; a realisation that could ultimately force a sale to foreign investors anyway.

Then again, there’s going to be another president on the horizon by 2025, if not sooner, so the rules might be changed back. The political posturing will continue…

Comments

Anonymous

We can’t fix air quality issues by making everyone drive electric cars. All that electricity has to come from somewhere and that somewhere is massive coal powerplants. Ill take the pollution from a v8 over a coal powerplant any day

08/11/2017 - 15:09 |
10 | 2
Bring a Caterham To MARS

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

And you’ll be wrong: producing electricity from a coal power plant (which I seem to need to remind you isn’t the only source of electricity there is, and in fact is the worst and most polluting) and using it to power an electric car is still far more efficient therefore cleaner

08/11/2017 - 18:35 |
5 | 5
Anonymous

Meanwhile at FCA: Hellcat all the line up.

08/11/2017 - 15:24 |
14 | 0
Anonymous

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Demon the line up

08/12/2017 - 06:33 |
1 | 1
Dat Incredible Chadkake

I’ve hated the CAFE standards for a while now, this is good

08/11/2017 - 16:31 |
2 | 1
Anonymous

I doubt this rule will have any effect. California’s emissions standards are already higher than the federal standards. So manufacturers focus on that instead so they don’t have problems selling cars there or in the 13 other states that have adopted those standards.

08/11/2017 - 17:28 |
3 | 1
Anonymous

It’s only going to influence the domestic market, for example the fiesta st in the usa may be more powerfull and less restricted exhaust wise, as the ones they export will stay as they are right now. He wants to lower the prices of new cars in the usa

08/11/2017 - 19:00 |
1 | 0
Jared G.

Sports cars can live on in murica! F yeah!!!

08/11/2017 - 21:15 |
2 | 0
Lucas Tekkan

So i can have a skyline legally in usa now ?

08/11/2017 - 23:09 |
1 | 0

You have been able to import skylines since the early 2000’s

08/12/2017 - 14:48 |
1 | 1
Deadpool (Cam's much sexier twin) (Official Demon Fangirl)

Where is the link to public comment. Daddy’s got some typing to do…

08/12/2017 - 00:54 |
0 | 0
CaptainChicken (Markus Leo) #DemonSquad #ClassicGMSquad

YESSSS, THE BUICK BIG BLOCKS SHALL ARISE ONCE AGAIN!!!!!

08/12/2017 - 01:51 |
2 | 0
Chris D.

Welp, we’re gonna run outta fuel by the time i turn 40.

08/12/2017 - 03:52 |
0 | 0

Topics

Sponsored Posts