Will All Cars Be Electric By 2025?

If Stanford economist Tony Seba's predictions are correct, the death knell is near for the internal combustion engine

A Stanford economist has made some predictions that will send cold shivers up the spines of petrolheads around the world. If his bold prophecies about the North American car market are correct, then 95% of people in the U.S. won’t own a car; no petroleum-fueled vehicles will be on the road; and the global oil industry will be eviscerated.

And all of this will happen before 2030.

Credit: North American Energy News
Credit: North American Energy News

These are not the ramblings of of a doomsday prepper or a science-fiction author. These bold claims are being made by Tony Seba, an internationally-renowned economist and futurist from Stanford University. Mr. Seba is the leader of a project called RethinkX; which consists of a panel of international academics studying the market dynamics of the transportation sector. The 77-page RethinkX report predicts that the transportation industry as we know it will disappear within a few short years.

The report contains a lot of maths and goes into great detail about the widespread economic implications of electric vehicle ownership. It’s a long and thorough report that takes quite a bit of time to read, but the basics behind it are actually fairly simple and intuitive. The most important aspect of the report is centred around the concept of transport as a service (TaaS). Basically, TaaS refers to services that provide transport for individuals (e.g. public transit, taxis, Uber/Lyft, etc.)

Will All Cars Be Electric By 2025?

Seba predicts that the cost of utilizing TaaS will fall to the point where it no longer makes economic sense to own a vehicle. Autonomous vehicles will play a critical role in this cost shift as it will eliminate the costs of hiring drivers, as well as provide people with the ability to be more productive in their commute. This surge in the value of TaaS will result in a collapse in the value of the private automobile, as it will cost more to buy and maintain a vehicle than it would to hire a car for transportation.

The ripple effects don’t stop there. RethinkX also predicts that the marginal costs of producing and running EVs will also fall such that petroleum-powered vehicles become economically unattractive. Once this happens, the demand for petroleum products in the transportation industry will all but disappear.

Will All Cars Be Electric By 2025?

This sounds like devastating news for petrolheads, but the implications could be even worse for the economies of many regions of the world. For example, the Canadian province of Alberta relies heavily on its oil industry to sustain its economy. A collapse in the oil market would almost certainly devastate the large cities of Edmonton and Calgary (pictured); and could possibly disrupt the national economies of both Canada and the United States. These predictions seem to make common sense. The shock value of the RethinkX report comes from the time scale—it proposes that these changes will take place around 20 years sooner than previously thought.

Will All Cars Be Electric By 2025?

Of course, these consequences beg the question of how accurate the RethinkX prophecy is. If the advancement of technology is as rapid as Tony Seba predicts, autonomous EVs and collective ride-sharing will theoretically optimal. I’m not quite as convinced, however, that the private automobile is going anywhere just yet.

There are a few reasons why I am skeptical of RethinkX. Owning a car has thus far been an immortal component of the American Dream, and I don’t see people being very willing to give up the emotional attachment to their own cars. People don’t make decisions purely based on economic efficiency. What’s more, there’s a certain amount of peace of mind associated simply with owning your own car. If your car has ever broken down and caused you to make alternative transportation arrangements, you’ll know exactly what I am talking about.

I am also skeptical of the report’s prediction that the industry will rapidly advance and squeeze the internal combustion engine out of the market. The corporations associated with the automotive industry are incredibly powerful, and I doubt very highly that they will go down without a fight. This is also true of the magnates of the oil industry, which include OPEC and the massive transnational corporations that produce and distribute petroleum products. The implications of international relationships with oil-producing nations would also be a massive challenge to overcome.

Finally, as mentioned above in one of my previous Ecarnomics blogs, one cannot ignore the impact of widespread EV usage on the electrical infrastructure. This concern is particularly obvious in developing nations in the global South, but cannot be ignored even in nations with the best power grids. It will probably never be known how such an increase in the demand for electricity will impact the electrical infrastructure; and the electricity market therein.

Despite the radical and potentially unrealistic view of the future that RethinkX gives us, I cannot dismiss the report outright. It could very well be right. The economics make an enticing case for a driverless future, no matter how absurd it seems to us petrolheads. Tony Seba’s report is incredibly important to understand, as it outlines the inevitable car culture of the future. Whether or not that future will arrive in 10 years or 40 years, however, remains to be seen.

An #ecarnomics post.

Comments

Anonymous

Need I say more?

05/16/2017 - 14:29 |
6 | 0
TheMiataBoi (formally TheTunerGuy)

80% of world power plants still use fossil fuels. If we stop producing petrol cars, not only will thousands of mechanics, gas station workers, and other people in the oil/gas/automotive industry lose there jobs, but there will still be a MAJOR pollution problem (hint, massive fossil fuel based power plants release way more emotions that cars). Also, were are we going to put all of the existing gas cars hen we eliminate them? In a landfill? That almost defeats the point! Like Cesare Borgia said, we should try alternatives before completely trashing the petroleum car.

05/16/2017 - 14:53 |
2 | 0
Anonymous

What people don’t seem to grasp (i.e. people who react to this kind of media by jumping on the bandwagon) is that the financial and environmental cost to adjust any first-world nation’s infrastructure from serving ICEs to EVs, is absolutely VAST.

Imagine building every petrol/service/gas station from scratch. Or, if not quite on that scale, imagine renovating them/updating them all. And then MOT/test centres. And equipment. And garages/equipment. And home chargers/superchargers (which are absolutely vital for the majority of non-city users). And what about power cuts?

EVs are not just about reinventing the motor, it’s about reinventing the infrastructure around it. By 2030?? If there are actual EVs that are cheap equivalents to ICEs, that’ll be a start. That might happen by 2030. Actually getting people to seamlessly switch? NOWHERE NEAR.

05/16/2017 - 15:01 |
6 | 0
Anonymous

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Although, it will possibly happen eventually. The car is “an immortal component of the American dream”? The American dream isn’t immortal never mind cars. The history of the two together is just over 100 years. That’s just our grandparents time.
EVs could be predominant in some countries by 2100, but in 2100 years, people in some countries will still never have had a bike, never mind a car, never mind an EV. Horses and camels will still be both transport and currency, never mind what ‘new’ mechanical modes are used by the wealthy nations of the world, or what notions they take to make money out of novelty and luxury (for luxury, read: making things like travel physically easy).

05/16/2017 - 15:27 |
4 | 0
Anonymous

Nice downtown shot of my hometown Calgary Alberta, Canada.

05/16/2017 - 18:17 |
2 | 0
Anonymous

So does it means that petrol will be cheap because anybody will buy it? Screw electric cars … i’m going to drive petrol always

05/17/2017 - 05:28 |
0 | 0
Olds Alero

I don’t understand why the world is trying to kill oil off so quickly, as opposed to letting it go slowly. If we gradually convert to more eco-friendly energy sources, countries that have economies that rely on exporting oil can find something different to sell. But if we make oil obsolete too quickly, nations like Saudi Arabia and other major oil exporters will be facing a major economic collapse, which would have long-lasting effects. I understand that we’re basically murdering the planet with pollution right now, but we’ll also kill some very important countries if we continue the war on gas at this overly-quick rate. The Middle East depends on their oil to survive, and if their economies fall apart, it could lead to even more civil wars.

05/17/2017 - 18:58 |
2 | 0
Dave 15

Oil is cheap at present. If it remains cheap then that will slow the advance of EVs. If I were an oil producer right now I’d be trying to get as much of that stuff out of the ground as possible while remaining profitable. In 20 years it could be completely worthless!

05/18/2017 - 00:15 |
0 | 0
French Freys

I’ll be in that 5% I guess

05/18/2017 - 10:48 |
0 | 0
CasualG

F*ck Electric cars! Let’s go nuclear!!!

05/18/2017 - 13:38 |
4 | 0
Anonymous

[DELETED]

05/22/2017 - 21:48 |
2 | 0

Topics

Sponsored Posts