Old And Obese Crash Test Dummies Are America's Next Safety Innovation

Faced with a standard crash test dummy that's too thin and young for America's modern population, one company has developed two older, fatter dummies to help push safety in new directions
Old And Obese Crash Test Dummies Are America's Next Safety Innovation

Crash test dummies are about to get fat. And old. The 50-year-old standard size and shape of dummy is about to be joined by new models representing elderly and obese people.

The familiar dummy style is said to represent the average size and weight for the current population, but with more people becoming overweight and an ageing population in many western nations, an American (obviously) manufacturer called Humanetics has unveiled the two new prototypes that it says will lead to better crash protection for the old and/or overweight.

Old And Obese Crash Test Dummies Are America's Next Safety Innovation

One is modelled on a 70-year-old woman with a body mass index (BMI) of 29, and the other mimics a fat man in his 40s with a BMI of 35. The sensors have been placed and calibrated to record the unique responses of these body types.

There are key differences in the way different body types handle car crashes, say the scientists involved in the project. Fat people suffer less abdominal trauma but more lower body damage in a comparable impact versus an average person. In fact, a University of California study from 2013 found that obese drivers are 78 per cent more likely to die in a car crash, owing to their ‘submarining’ under the seatbelt and out of its protective cuddle.

Old And Obese Crash Test Dummies Are America's Next Safety Innovation

As for old people, traditional diagonal seatbelts can cause huge chest injuries, with Humanetics hinting at the potential for other designs that better protect more fragile bones. Five-point harnesses, anyone? Probably not.

One question we do have is whether, if these designs make it into official Euro NCAP crash testing, manufacturers will have to provide three times the amount of cars for destruction so that testers can check all three body shapes in every simulation. We can’t imagine they’d be thrilled about the extra expense…

Comments

Anonymous

Finally, freedom can be safe in a car crash. #MURICA

05/11/2017 - 20:39 |
0 | 0
Antiprius

Or you could lose weight. There’s an option.

05/11/2017 - 20:53 |
4 | 2
V-Tech and EcoBoost kicked in yo

In reply to by Antiprius

Fast food is cheaper than healthy food. A lot of Americans simply can’t afford a nutritious meal.

05/11/2017 - 21:43 |
2 | 0
Anonymous

Tries desperately to come up with something clever to make the top 10 comments but needs a half dozen cheeseburgers to fuel creativity.

05/11/2017 - 23:46 |
4 | 0
Sennalover2018

It is a very clever idea from the safety people to come up with that, not trying to offend anyone at all but if I do then I apologise for it, but it will make manufacturers think carefully for the safety of the occupants inside the vehicle, clever idea

05/12/2017 - 00:14 |
0 | 0
RodriguezRacer456 (Aventador SV) (Lambo Squad)

Any dummies for very small drivers with very white teeth?

05/12/2017 - 01:39 |
2 | 0

Richard Hammond?

05/12/2017 - 14:10 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

Ps: the Renault Duster (Dacia Duster) got 0 stars with out airbags 😱😱

05/12/2017 - 03:38 |
0 | 2
Anonymous

They shouldn’t really do this. It only gives them the idea that being obese is actually ok and it’s normal to have diabetes issues.

05/12/2017 - 06:46 |
2 | 0
Anonymous

I don’t think Americans should laugh with that… Obesity is a serious problem in your country

05/12/2017 - 10:30 |
4 | 0
Anonymous

good, i’m american and the average american has gain about 26 pounds in fat. i’m not overweight, i’m just saying fat people are like 1/3 of the country and they are EVRYWHERE.

05/12/2017 - 17:07 |
2 | 0

Topics

Sponsored Posts