6 Cars That Prove Manual Gearboxes Aren't Always Better

We love a good manual gearbox and when it comes to certain car models we wouldn't accept anything else, but there are some exceptions in the fast car world where we'd only choose an auto
6 Cars That Prove Manual Gearboxes Aren't Always Better

Much as we might ride the hate train from time to time when it comes to automatic versions of iconic sports cars, we’re not completely against the two-pedal option when it works. We could be here all week listing cars that are better as manuals, but here are a few we think are actually better as automatics.

BMW 340i

6 Cars That Prove Manual Gearboxes Aren't Always Better

These days the 3-series is a pretty big car. Broad, long and taller than you might think, it’s not the slim but muscular althlete it used to be. Nor does it handle with quite the same sharpness or precision as older versions, having become a bit flat and anodyne by comparison.

Take the most powerful non-M 3-series and you still have a manual option, but with little or no development spend over the last few years it’s hardly an all-time classic gearbox. With reduced driving dynamics and an average manual shift, the cutting-edge eight-speed auto makes this 3-series a better car.

Volkswagen Polo GTI

6 Cars That Prove Manual Gearboxes Aren't Always Better

We know the Polo well, right from its boggo spec up to GTI level, and in a range oddly devoid of anything memorable, the DSG-equipped Polo is a better car than the manual. The way the Polo chassis is tuned doesn’t really suit the purpose for which it was built, being a bit too much Sense and Sensibility instead of Mad Max.

It’s strange, really, because we really like the Seat Ibiza Cupra, but there are more differences than you’d think between the two. Either way, the Polo’s lazier attitude to life means that its twin-clutch transmission actually improves it.

Jaguar F-Type

6 Cars That Prove Manual Gearboxes Aren't Always Better

It’s a strange thing when the media – and customers – clamour for a manual gearbox option in a car only to be disappointed when it arrives, but that’s what happened with the F-Type. While four-wheel drive has given the car a new turn of cross-country pace at the expense of the rear-driven car’s lairy antics, the manual gearbox was sadly a bit slack, imprecise and generally not very rewarding.

That means we’d stick to the eight-speed torque converter option, which makes the most of the V6 and V8 engines’ power and fits the GT-lite feel of the car a bit better.

Ferrari 488

6 Cars That Prove Manual Gearboxes Aren't Always Better

Before you say it, we know the 488 doesn’t come with a manual option. But in fairness we wouldn’t want it to. The 3.9-litre twin-turbo V8 is so monstrously powerful, and the car is so outrageously capable, that a manual gearbox is only going to be a distraction when you’re trying to concentrate. Plus, of course, the shift speed is far superior to any manual, and that sort of thing matters to Ferrari buyers.

The 488 is a car you need to drive a lot before you can get near its galactic limits, but the vast majority of owners won’t drive it more than once every month or two. On those occasional sprints it’s easier to enjoy as an automatic, and we have to say we like it that way.

Volkswagen Golf R estate

6 Cars That Prove Manual Gearboxes Aren't Always Better

The second Volkswagen to hit our list does so for very different reasons. The estate is our favourite Golf R (because fast wagon) and has the broadest range of talents. One of those is biffing around with a load of DIY supplies or a piece of furniture in the back. For urban duties an auto makes sense.

But then open the taps on a country road and the DSG gives you hilariously rude parps via the exhausts on full-bore upshifts. It’s a Jekyll and Hyde car, this, and never more so than when you lose the third pedal.

Porsche 911 Turbo S

6 Cars That Prove Manual Gearboxes Aren't Always Better

Sometimes there’s so much speed happening that you just want both hands on the wheel. The 911 Turbo S makes that happen. It’s a technological powerhouse, packed with the latest and greatest in the field of making cars go fast, so a twin-clutch gearbox makes a lot of sense.

Don’t get us wrong; we love the idea of big, hairy-chested 580bhp manual driver’s cars, but when you’re actually hustling one, trying to enjoy yourself while managing not to stick it into a wall/hedge/lamppost/postbox/crowd of children, being able to keep both hands in place and flick paddles to shift is handy. Manuals are still our choice in less powerful 911s, but here we’d have to draw the line even if Porsche hadn’t.

Are there more fast cars that suit automatics better than manuals? Or will you go to your grave swearing that manuals are the only right and proper way? Let us know in the comments.

Comments

BarathS

OMG YES MY 340I IS ON THERE YEEEEEEEEEEEES

12/30/2016 - 15:36 |
1 | 0

Nice, check out my 340i

12/30/2016 - 18:21 |
0 | 0
InjunS2K

For the Jag F Type, I’m sure all your worries would be solved with a short shift kit ;)

12/30/2016 - 16:49 |
1 | 0
Anonymous

I have to say that I dont quite understand why they hate that much on the bmw gearbox … My 335xi was a pure joy to drive and the shifter action was IMO way better than in my 2016 wrx …

12/30/2016 - 17:13 |
1 | 0
George Leluashvili

HOW DARE YOU

12/30/2016 - 17:24 |
0 | 1
Anonymous

CT talks about how autos are better than manuals in some cars, but then would complain about how less car makers are making manuals, Kermit sips tea but that’s none of business.

12/30/2016 - 17:32 |
1 | 1
wild_toilet 🇧🇷 (Miata Addict)

I never knew the automatic F-Type has a torque converter. I always thought it was a dual clutch with 8 gears. I’m not really a fan of torque converter autos, and I love the F-Type, but that kinda sucks

12/30/2016 - 20:19 |
0 | 0
Mr.Roberts

“ The 3.9-litre twin-turbo V8 is so monstrously powerful, and the car is so outrageously capable, that a manual gearbox is only going to be a distraction when you’re trying to concentrate.” Matt Kimberley if someone can shift gears in an early model koenigsegg without dying (twice), change the earth’s rotation and rewriting newton’s laws of physics then you have no reason to complain about a 488’s power not being a distraction with a manual. The fact is, a lot of people who buy these can’t even drive a manual, and don’t use manual mode. Also, i don’t think Ferrari has it in them to make a good manual transmission anymore.( or good cars for that matter). And who gets distracted by a manual in a 600hp car anyway like wtf how bad is your ability to focus?

12/30/2016 - 22:45 |
0 | 1
Zaire McDonald

You pointed out cars that were given bad manual gearboxes and cars that were too fast for manuals. In response to the first one, how would a car with a bad gearbox be if you swapped out a good transmission and clutch. In response to the second one, some cars are too fast for gearboxes (cough Nismo GTR, Ferarri F12 TDF, Koeniggsegg ANYTHING). That’s just fact. But that only proves half of your claim.

12/31/2016 - 02:09 |
1 | 1
Anonymous

If you legit have good reasoning for liking an automatic and desiring one in your car I’m totally OK with that.. But car throttle lately seems like it’s a ton of kids that cannot whatsoever drive a manual and so they try to come up with facts about why an automatic is better and argue for the automatic not actually because they genuinely think it’s better and are looking at it objectively.. But because they cannot drive stick and don’t want to feel inferior.. They want to change everyone else’s mind because for so long all real car guys were always about manual transmissions (and still are if you ask me). They don’t actually care about whether a stick is harder to drive in traffic or not (it’s not) they’ve probably never done it before.. But the guy that has driven manual for the last 5 to 15 years and just wants to relax and hit the gas in bumper to bumper is totally fine with me, that’s his opinion. Hope that made sense.. I’m not bagging on people that prefer autos. Just seems like a lot of kids that don’t know better.

12/31/2016 - 05:46 |
2 | 1
Andy Helmick jr.

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

I agree with you completely. I’m honestly neutral about transmission preference. I personally drive an automatic because I wanted a nice car for cheap and I couldn’t find any manuals that appealed to me.(also haven’t really had any experience with a manual car so that was a factor as well.)

04/26/2017 - 12:49 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

“and that matters to ferrari buyers”
the ferrari buyer is james may.

12/31/2016 - 08:03 |
0 | 0

Topics

Sponsored Posts