6 Cars That Lied About Their Power Outputs

For various reasons, manufacturers are sometimes a little conservative with their power figures. Here are six cars that are a lot more powerful that stated...
6 Cars That Lied About Their Power Outputs

BMW M5 (F10)

6 Cars That Lied About Their Power Outputs

While it was jolly exciting when the M5 broke the 600hp (592bhp) mark with the 30 Jahre version of the F10, it perhaps wasn’t as big a deal as it might have otherwise been. Why? Because the standard car was already hitting that figure. Lord knows how much the special edition was actually putting out.

Various dyno tests have put standard F10 M5s around the 600 mark, well in excess of the official figure of 552bhp. We still feel sad about the death of the V10 version, but that power is one hell of a way to make up for it.

Nissan Skyline GT-R (R34)

6 Cars That Lied About Their Power Outputs

When looking at a lot of Japanese performance cars from the 1990s and early 2000s, a figure will come up quite frequently: 276bhp. Allegedly, it’s all part of a gentleman’s agreement that saw the major Japanese car manufacturers producing cars with bang on that figure on paper, but the reality is many were putting out over 300bhp.

In the case of the R34, the actual power output from its twin-turbo RB26 straight-six is more like 322.

Toyota Century

6 Cars That Lied About Their Power Outputs

It wasn’t just performance cars that had some less than realistic power figures in the 1990s. The V12-powered Toyota Century officially made - you guessed it - 276bhp, when it actually developed over 300bhp. So this 5.0-litre lump was still producing a fairly modest, understressed output for such a big engine - just one that was slightly higher than advertised.

Porsche 959

6 Cars That Lied About Their Power Outputs

One of the most exciting and technologically innovative supercars of the 1980s was the legendary Porsche 959. It had four-wheel drive, active suspension, and even active tyre monitoring.

With 450bhp developed from its turbocharged flat-six, it was no slouch either. However, rumour has it the cars left the factory with closer to 500. There isn’t quite as much solid info on the veracity of the claims compared to other cars here, but it’s a rumour that persists.

Ford Mustang Cobra Jet

6 Cars That Lied About Their Power Outputs

There was a period during the 1960s and 1970s when muscle car engines were given hilariously understated power outputs. The biggest liar of them all? That’d be the Mustang Cobra Jet.

It came packing a performance version of the Blue Oval’s 428 cubic-inch big-block V8, officially making 335hp. In reality, it made 410. Yep, an additional 75 horses Ford neglected to mention.

Chevrolet Camaro (fourth-gen)

6 Cars That Lied About Their Power Outputs

Stock LS1-powered Chevrolet Camaros from the car’s fourth generation are supposed to make 305hp at the crank. The reality is most put out around that figure at the wheels.

The same goes for the Pontiac Firebird, which used the same LS1. The same LS1 was used in the C5 Chevrolet Corvette with some very slight differences, but that time a more accurate official power output of 350hp was given.

What other understated engines can you think of? Let us know in the comments!

Comments

MASM

RS6 and other VAG group cars they say like 605 hp but actually it’s that to the wheels

12/09/2016 - 21:15 |
0 | 0
Jovan 1

Why do manufacturers do that?

12/09/2016 - 21:42 |
0 | 0

At least here in germany, it has to do with ensurance. Until the 80s or 90s (not really sure exactly when that changed, i’m not that old) car ensurance was calculated by hp, there were different brackets up to 360hp, after that it didn’t matter. At some point, they went to a class system factoring in region and “type” and somwhere in that type-class hp is still a factor, so “forgetting” some hp along the line can make a car more appealing. I’m not going into tuned or rare cars, you are in for a supprise if you go with over the counter contracts from the big wigs.
But please take this with a grain of salt, i’m no ensurance man.

12/10/2016 - 02:56 |
6 | 0
Anonymous

323ti Compact (99-08/2000) official 170- but its arround 200 ;)

12/09/2016 - 21:53 |
0 | 2
Luke 21

Have always been looking into an ls1 f body, I was unaware after looking for a few years. Good to know!

12/09/2016 - 22:26 |
2 | 0
Anonymous

The 2000s Shelby GT500

12/09/2016 - 22:34 |
2 | 0
MystCobra71

1971 Ford Falcon GTHO Phase 3. They were quoted at around 300hp but they were able to get 13-second quarter miles completely stock

12/09/2016 - 23:16 |
8 | 0
Anonymous

Saab at the turn of the millennium with their 95 Aero, they said it made 230 bhp and around 258lb/ft give or take. In reality though, they made closer to 250bhp and if I’m not mistaken, 270lb/ft, a couple of years later, they changed the spec sheets to the actual power figures.

12/09/2016 - 23:19 |
4 | 0
Anonymous

How about the legendary Ford Falcon GTHO Phase III? It was supposedly making 224kW, but in reality it was putting out around 280kW.

12/09/2016 - 23:24 |
6 | 0
Kyle Stewart

Doesn’t Porsche always state there cars make less power than they actually do for like every car they produce now?

12/09/2016 - 23:29 |
0 | 0

Yes they do. The 918 is allegedly making way more than the 887 advertised horsepower, also the turbo models are well known for this. “0-100 in 3.5sec”… when in reality it’s almost a second quicker.

12/12/2016 - 13:59 |
2 | 0
Anonymous

How about the Dodge Neon srt4? I’m sure that thing put out around 50hp more than stated

12/10/2016 - 00:34 |
2 | 0

Topics

Sponsored Posts