GM's Plan For Self-Driving Cars Sounds Incredibly Bleak

Tesla and General Motors have very different ideas about the best way to introduce autonomous cars - and chances are you're only going to like one of them
GM's Plan For Self-Driving Cars Sounds Incredibly Bleak

General Motors has laid down a pretty bleak plan for its first self-driving cars, pretty much in direct opposition to the Tesla business model.

The giant American corporation’s CEO, Mary Barra, has said that its first fully self-driving cars will have “speed limitations” and won’t be able to operate outside pre-set geographical boundaries, while new Tesla models will optionally come with all the necessary hardware for full automation – even if owners can’t use it yet.

According to Fortune in the US, the General Motors vision for self-driving cars starts in a “controlled ride-sharing environment.” The firm has recently invested $500 million in on-demand ride service Lyft, with the intention of adding autonomous cars to the fleet. GM is also launching its own car-sharing service, called Maven. But either way, you can keep your filthy human hands off the controls, buddy.

GM's Plan For Self-Driving Cars Sounds Incredibly Bleak

Customers won’t even be able to buy the self-driving GMs. As well as being restricted on the road, the cars will only be leased by those early-adopters who prefer their autonomous cars slow and undemanding, as opposed to those who like them to hit 60mph in 2.7 seconds. In the wet.

Tesla boss Elon Musk has previously been quoted as saying his approach to ‘driverless’ cars is actually the responsible way to do it – he argues that increasing automation as quickly as possible will save more lives.

What’s your stance on GM’s approach to self-driving cars? Has Mary Barra got it right or wrong?

Comments

Darren Cassey

To be fair, Mary Barra has to keep busy doing something since Great British Bake Off got cancelled.

10/29/2016 - 19:51 |
1 | 0

I wish i got BBC Canada, apparently i have to buy a whole package of useless channels just to get one which costs $10.00 something or other…

10/30/2016 - 12:12 |
0 | 0
Dominic Angelico

A part from everyone else having them so we can have more petrol, why do we care about autonomy?

10/29/2016 - 23:12 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

Why would anyone buy a driverless car especially people on this site.. Id rather gm own all of them there selves and me just have to oder one up like a taxi when im too drunk to drive my own car home sonce thats the only time id ever ride in one anyway.

10/30/2016 - 03:26 |
2 | 0
suchdoge

This sounds like the EV all over again. Take a set location like California dump hundreds of vehicles there let there be feedback from driver’s, then at the end of the day you have no choice on buying out the lease term but for gm to crush them all instead… GM i love you but you’ve done this before, and how did it work out…

10/30/2016 - 12:08 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

Tesla will crash and burn if you know about the tesla company

10/31/2016 - 22:51 |
0 | 0
GregK

100TH UPVOTE NO ONE CAN TAKE THIS FROM ME

11/01/2016 - 23:50 |
0 | 0

Topics

Sponsored Posts