Holy Crap, I Got Over 33MPG In A Ford Mustang GT

With a thumping great N/A V8 under the hood, our Mustang GT longtermer should have a heinous thirst however you drive it. But that's not necessarily the case...

Yes, I'm boring enough to hypermile a V8 Mustang. 33.2mpg tho! #cars #Mustang #TeamCT

A photo posted by Matt Robinson (@ctmatt201) on

Before we go any further, yes: I hyper-miled a V8 Mustang, and yes: I realise that probably makes me seem like a massive dullard. While I’m sure many of you are keen to now dismiss all this with a cool story bro, I do think it’s genuinely interesting given this current downsizing trend we find ourselves in that an old-school, N/A V8 can clock 33.2mpg on a long, gentle motorway drive.

What makes it even more interesting is I went on a similar drive in Ecoboost ‘Stang, and managed 38mpg. Yes, that’s better, but not by as much as you’d think, particularly given that this was a downsized engine-friendly, mostly off-boost run.

The gap in fuel economy between the Mustang GT and Ecoboost isn't as big as you might think
The gap in fuel economy between the Mustang GT and Ecoboost isn't as big…

As is often a case with these modern turbo engines, the gap closes even further when you’re pressing on. Go for a thrash in the Ecoboost, and you’ll typically get about 16mpg, while the V8 tends to drop to about 13mpg.

Granted, these aren’t figures we got from rigorous scientific testing, but it’s nice to know you might not get clobbered in your wallet quite as much as you might expect by buying a V8. And hey, for the improvement in the soundtrack department I’d happily take an even bigger hit in the financial department…

Comments

Hast

So what’s this in non-retard units?

09/25/2016 - 15:50 |
38 | 14
Anonymous

In reply to by Hast

About 8,6 l/100km

09/25/2016 - 20:56 |
10 | 0
ModernChaos

In reply to by Hast

You’re right, an article about an American car definitely shouldn’t be in imperial units. You’re a smart guy, I bet people like you

09/26/2016 - 12:15 |
8 | 2
Ray Sloan

In reply to by Hast

A unit can’t be stupid . They’re just numbers.

09/26/2016 - 13:34 |
4 | 2
Black Phillip

In reply to by Hast

I live in a metric using country and even I don’t use L/100km. I just find MPG so much easier to understand plus I grew up with it. I also fully understand both systems of measurement under any circumstances.

09/26/2016 - 18:13 |
6 | 10
Chrispy

This is two mpg better than I get in my 1.0 Ecoboost ‘16 Focus…proof once again that fuel economy is about how you drive, not just what you’re driving!

09/25/2016 - 16:05 |
2 | 0
Scottish petrolhead

Wtf

09/25/2016 - 16:07 |
0 | 0
AmilBRZ 🌐

Omg. All of my parents cars barely get 25 lol

09/25/2016 - 17:01 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

My Focus ST gets 25 MPG on long distance when I’m driving reasonable with some occasional fun.
I think I should buy a Mustang…

09/25/2016 - 17:44 |
2 | 0
Anonymous

Thats 7-10 mpg better than my 1987 Civic! Granted, I floor it when getting on the freeway and it has a Weber 32/36 carb that still needs proper tuning. I’m kinda curious about hyper mileing my Civic now. Best I ever got out of it was about 30mpg taking a 200 mile trip to Pismo Beach. Though, my throttle cable was way out of adjustment, giving me only about 35% throttle max.

09/25/2016 - 17:46 |
2 | 0
Alex Joe Mills

I barely get 40mpg in my fiesta ecoboost 1.0

09/25/2016 - 18:45 |
0 | 0

Had one of those as a hire car, hated the damn thing.

09/26/2016 - 11:44 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

now where’s that crowd, so i can show them i can crash 33mpg into them

09/25/2016 - 18:49 |
0 | 6
mheffe

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Was it hard coming up with such an original joke?

10/11/2016 - 17:13 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

And I’m over here getting 16mpg in a 2013 Ford Explorer

09/25/2016 - 20:41 |
0 | 0
quit CT

murican engineering

09/25/2016 - 21:52 |
4 | 0

Topics

Manufacturers

Sponsored Posts