The CR-Z Is A Seriously Underrated Honda

It’s reasonably quick, great to drive and just a bit different, so does the CR-Z deserve a little more love?
The CR-Z Is A Seriously Underrated Honda

The Honda CR-Z is one of those cars you can’t help but pre-judge based on its rather lowly performance stats. With a 0-62mph time of 9.1 seconds and just 135bhp on tap, it certainly doesn’t seem to have the poke to match its left-field, sports car-ish styling. Which seems a shame as it’s a proper feast for the eyes with its spaceship-like styling, CR-X-style rear glasshouse and a plethora of quirky details like those rocket-shaped door handles.

When driving one for the first time - at the same event where I drove a disappointing automatic NSX - my expectations were low. But damn, were those expectations well and truly obliterated. Why? Because the CR-Z is a proper laugh to drive.

The CR-Z Is A Seriously Underrated Honda

The 1.5-litre naturally-aspirated inline-four loves to be thrashed up to its 6500rpm redline, letting out a surprisingly raucous induction noise as it laps up your ever increasing throttle demands. The gearbox (a manual, which is rare for a hybrid) has a short and slick throw, and while it’s not quite as legendary as the manual shifts in Honda greats like the Integra Type R and S2000, it’s a joy to use. The pedals are perfectly spaced for rev matching, too.

Part of the CR-Z’s total output might come from an electric motor, but there aren’t any obvious instant torque boost heroics here - the effects of the hybrid powertrain are more subtle, resulting in an engine that feels just a little more flexible than a regular low-power N/A unit.

The CR-Z Is A Seriously Underrated Honda

To drive, the CR-Z feels very much like an FN2 Civic Type R that’s a little slower and far less punishing in the ride department. The damping is brilliantly judged, actually - it’s just about composed enough, but there’s way more give in it than the FN2’s setup. On a lumpy, bumpy backroad, the fidgety Type R of the CR-Z’s era would have a hard time pulling away despite its power advantage.

Front-end grip is decent, and the steering is fast and feelsome. And when you calm down, you can enjoy the CR-Z’s unusual cabin with its colour-changing rev counter/speedometer and odd touches like a button that’s just for changing the units from KMH to MPH. How weirdly specific is that?

The CR-Z Is A Seriously Underrated Honda

It’s a car that’s fast enough for most, great fun on the right road and refreshingly different. Even though it only went off a few years ago, it’s already a piece of Honda’s history many have forgotten. It probably doesn’t help that few were sold, making the CR-Z a rare sight on the roads - only 4000 are currently licensed in the UK.

The CR-Z Is A Seriously Underrated Honda

It’s definitely worth seeking out a used one, however. A quick peruse of a classifieds reveals that you can pick one up for under £5000, which seems like an utter steal.

Is there a place in your heart for this strange but brilliant little Honda?

Comments

Wogmidget

Didn’t they also sell it with a crappy CVT though?

08/12/2018 - 10:12 |
2 | 0
Myron Tang

Too bad it doesn’t have rwd

08/12/2018 - 10:15 |
0 | 0

Almost no hondas have rwd, FWD is one of their specialties along with natural aspiration

08/12/2018 - 12:28 |
4 | 0
Ben Ireland

One of the reasons this didn’t sell was because it pretty much is a 2 seater, no-one apart for very young children can hope to fit in the back seats

08/12/2018 - 10:27 |
2 | 0
Jakob

I think it was unpopular because Honda tried to target two disjoint target audiences at the same time (sports car buyers and hybrid car buyers) while not really appealing to either one. It looks really good, no question, but it’s hard to sell a car as a sports car when it’s as quick as a Golf 1.4 TSI; and if you wanted a fuel efficient hybrid car, you did what every reasonable person would do and bought a Toyota Prius. I think it’s also worth mentioning that the Mk.3 Toyota Prius is just half a second slower to 100 km/h than the Honda CR-Z, while having four doors and getting considerably better fuel economy.

08/12/2018 - 10:40 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

In reply to by Jakob

They should’ve gone for fuel economy and screw everything else, just like it’s predecessor the insight G1 did, but they gave it sporty tires and loads of other crap a car like this would never need

08/12/2018 - 17:22 |
0 | 0
Joel Lundin

I had roadtrip in one of these from Uppsala to Falkenberg a couple of days ago and i totally fell in love. Its great fun and the fuel consumption is great 5.2l/100km

08/12/2018 - 10:57 |
6 | 0
Anonymous

They also made it into supremely cool JAF GT300 car for Super GT!

08/12/2018 - 11:01 |
22 | 0
Anonymous

Yeah, there is a CR-Z which is parked everyday near my house. It just looks really good.

08/12/2018 - 12:16 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

Looks like a big block of American cheddar in that color.

08/12/2018 - 12:23 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

It’s pretty much a new heavier crx

08/12/2018 - 12:29 |
2 | 0
Griffin Mackenzie

True shame that the majority of them were super duper slow

08/12/2018 - 13:28 |
0 | 0

Topics

Manufacturers

Sponsored Posts