Scrapping Annual Car Safety Tests Would Be Disastrous

To say that we're angry that the UK government is considering axing the annual MOT safety check is an understatement
Scrapping Annual Car Safety Tests Would Be Disastrous

Imagine a society where no car was checked to make sure it was safe and roadworthy. Where people could leave bald tyres on their cars until they burst, where rust was left to run riot, causing catastrophic mid-corner failures, and where windscreens can get cracked, smeared and otherwise obscured with no one to put the owners in their place until it’s too late.

That’s exactly what the UK government, backed by at least one major daily newspaper, is calling for: the abolition of the annual MOT test. The Ministry of Transport test has been Britain’s standardised annual used car safety check since 1960, covering an ever-increasing number of parts and systems along the way.

Scrapping Annual Car Safety Tests Would Be Disastrous

It makes sure that a driver can see out of the windscreen properly. It checks that the brake pedal isn’t wired to the reversing lights (I really did see that once), and that the headlights aren’t angled straight into oncoming traffic’s eyes. There are dozens of safety issues that the MOT test covers. Without it, the potential for all sorts of avoidable carnage is limitless.

Surely it’s better to pay the £25-£50ish fee and know that your car is basically safe. We all know that the MOT, and the EU and US equivalents, aren’t foolproof and don’t cover everything, but getting that certificate saying your car is in good health is still a vital – and always satisfying – part of car ownership.

Scrapping Annual Car Safety Tests Would Be Disastrous

It’s absolutely crucial that we keep the test. It’s the only barrier stopping society’s corner-cutters from stopping paying for essential maintenance. Many of us have mental libraries of anecdotes featuring friends, family, strangers who couldn’t give a monkey’s about stuff like tyres, brakes, lights, windscreen wipers, exhausts, suspension or anything else on a car, and only pay for repairs when they’re essentially forced to.

A friend of my brother’s turned up at his place once, where we were all getting together for a movie and a takeaway. She parked her Peugeot 206 on the drive and came inside. After a while she said to him: “Steve, you know a bit about cars, don’t you? Mine feels really funny, especially in the rain…”

Scrapping Annual Car Safety Tests Would Be Disastrous

Out he went. From the front door he could already see that both tyres on the closest side were almost flat. Same the other side. All four tyres were different brands and three were totally bald. The car had no MOT certificate because the dopey owner knew neither what it was nor that she was obliged to have one. She was lucky she hadn’t ended up in a wall, or injuring someone else. These people inspire a cold fury in me – and I’m sure the same goes for you.

Remove the annual checks, where those too ignorant or cheap to fix their cars of their own volition are legally forced to comply with roadworthiness standards, and how many dangerous faults will go unfixed? How many accidents waiting to happen will become accidents that have just happened? How many years down the line, and how many lives lost, will we reach before we realise what a ridiculous mistake scrapping the MOT test was?

Comments

Anonymous

Meanwhile here the EU is trying to get me to agree on bringing my 50cc to inspection every year. Bullshit, that would mean I’d had to source a road legal exhaust.

07/29/2018 - 22:02 |
3 | 0
Sebba992

I really don’t have any issue with the basic intention of the EU’s equivalent here in Norway (PKK), if only they wouldnt be so unreasonable about mods. Most of the car guys here kinda know what they are doing and the mods done are ususally properly done and thought through, and also many other countrys where the same mods are leagal proves there shouldn’t be any issues with them. Still you can not get them approved over here. Allthough on the upside the dangerous death traps than would likely be a risk to me and my car is usually picked up and removed from the roads. Except when they aren’t…… It’s not a perfect system, there is lots of room for improvement.

07/30/2018 - 04:17 |
1 | 0
suckingnozzles

I’m going to be unpopular here and say I want this. Currently travelling around Central America. The UK could do with chilling out a bit. The nanny state and all that.

07/30/2018 - 04:20 |
0 | 1
Anonymous

I would only be glad if they removed the “Pay to be legal” section of the inspection…why the fk I have to pay almost like 3.000€ for a carbonfiber bumper and pay 800€ to make lab tests and 200€ to get it homologated? Bunch of greedy dirt bags

07/30/2018 - 07:41 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

I live in the state of Florida and ket me just say I fully support inspections. We dont have them here and there are so many idiots that drive having no clue what is going on with their vehicle. One guy didn’t even know his brakes weren’t functional until his STUDENT pretty much forced him to change them. The stupidity of the few ruins the road for the rest of us

07/30/2018 - 16:01 |
0 | 0
Keenan 1

I was once behind a car where the brake lights were always on until they pushed the breaks,ridiculous

07/30/2018 - 16:38 |
1 | 0
Anonymous

The only bonus is that I can still drive a rust-bitten Merc E55 AMG estate anytime 😂

07/31/2018 - 11:26 |
1 | 0
Max Schröder

If you guys don’t need it anymore, can we have it?
Because it sounds like a very, VERY relaxed version of the German TÜV

08/09/2018 - 08:01 |
0 | 0
Ian Price

Everyone is so scared that crazy thing will happen but here in Indiana we don’t have safety checks or emissions tests because it’s not really needed because unless you are really dumb and ignorant you’ll most likely do just fine.

08/09/2018 - 21:23 |
0 | 0

Topics

Sponsored Posts