BMW M2 Competition Review: The 1M Successor It Should Have Been All Along

The new Competition version of the M2 rights almost all of the wrongs of the car it replaces
BMW M2 Competition Review: The 1M Successor It Should Have Been All Along

It promised so much, didn’t it? M Division clout in a small yet muscular package. An antidote to the oh-so spikey M4. A successor to the much-loved 1M.

But sadly, the M2 just didn’t work out like that. There’s plenty to like about the baby M, of course. It’s playful and accessible, while still demanding far more of the squishy, fleshy bit behind the steering wheel than something like an Audi RS3. It looked fantastic too, and I always dug the exhaust note, despite BMW’s misguided attempts to enhance it electronically in the cabin.

The problem has always been the engine. The fact that it’s not a proper S-designated M engine doesn’t help. The 1M got away with the same trick because BMW made the car’s N54 lump - the twin-turbo predecessor to M2’s single, twin-scroll turbo N55 - hilariously boosty. But the M2 engine? It’s always lacked drama, with its inadequacy highlighted further when BMW rolled out the punchy M240i not long after the M2’s launch.

BMW M2 Competition Review: The 1M Successor It Should Have Been All Along

You’d think, then, that I might have reacted with delirious joy at the birth of the M4-engined M2 Competition. And you’d be right. Sort of. The only problem being that we’ve already had the promise of the ideal real-world M car get dashed before, so what if this new one is destined to be another missed opportunity like the standard M2?

With the Comp’s Sport mode engaged and my first taste of wide-open throttle experienced, such fears were shattered, however. God, it’s a fierce thing. Finally, we have the epic mid-range thrust the old M2 - which this car replaces outright - was missing. And no longer does it peter out at high revs - you can bang that 3.0-litre straight-six around to the redline without regret.

BMW M2 Competition Review: The 1M Successor It Should Have Been All Along

Power is now at 404bhp, up from 364bhp, while the 404lb ft figure represents a 35lb ft increase. 0-62mph now takes 4.2 seconds, a drop of 0.2sec. Doesn’t sound like much on paper, but the character of the engine is radically different.

It also sounds very different, but it’s quite a harsh, angry noise at high engine speeds. In a way, I quite like it - with the giant-robot-munching-on-rusty-chainsaws nature of the din further hammering home that this fast 2er is a very different kettle of fish to the standard M2 and indeed the M240i.

BMW M2 Competition Review: The 1M Successor It Should Have Been All Along

BMW has had a go at improving the dynamics too. It’s been given the same carbonfibre strut brace as the M4, and the steering has been recalibrated to factor in the newfound front-end stiffness. Even with the fiddling, the M2 is as approachable as ever, putting the ‘roid rage-spec engine of the M4 in a far less intimidating package. And that’s a match made in M Division heaven, surely?

A manual gearbox would be our preference, and yes, one is still available, but the seven-speed dual-clutch gearbox is a good fit for the car. You just need to make sure it’s in the angriest of its three settings, otherwise it’s frustratingly hesitant to downshift. On the subject of modes, after a week of fiddling, I settled on Sport steering (Sport Plus is heavy in an unpleasant, stodgy sort of way), Sport Plus for engine response and the ESP set to the less intrusive MDM mode.

BMW M2 Competition Review: The 1M Successor It Should Have Been All Along

The really clever trick the M2 Competition pulls off is flattering you as a driver, while still requiring you give it the attention it’s due. Grip and traction levels aren’t all that hard to reach and exceed - especially at this time of year - but whenever proceedings take a slippy turn at the rear, the Comp is wonderfully easy to manage.

It’s still not perfect, however, and my other big bugbear about the old M2 - the damping - remains unresolved. It rides firmly, and yet there is more body roll than you’d expect. And it never seems to settle - you have a near-constant vertical bob. This less than ideal body control means that the car often feels heavy and leaden. It’s still miles off Porsche Cayman-levels of dynamism.

BMW M2 Competition Review: The 1M Successor It Should Have Been All Along

While I’m moaning, it’s also worth pointing out that the interior really is starting to feel dated, especially knowing that the incoming Mercedes-AMG A45 will have a slick, screen-festooned cabin to enjoy.

Regardless, the Competition makeover turns the M2 into the car it always should have been - the lairy but fun descendent of the 1M and an apple that hasn’t fallen far from the tree. And unlike the M3 CS we drove recently, BMW hasn’t even cranked up the price all that much - at £49,285 (for a manual) it’s only around £2500 more expensive than before and still cheaper than the far less engaging Audi TT RS. It’s the cheapest current M car, and it’s finally the M car to have, just as we were hoping for it to be in the first place.

Could a circa £50k coupe ever be described as a bargain? In this case, I think so.

Comments

NotARealRoadTest

The 1M is still my favourite car at the moment, but the gap has closed quite a lot with the M2 competition. I may end up preferring the M2 Competition

12/03/2018 - 12:54 |
1 | 0

No not really unfortunately.

12/03/2018 - 13:45 |
0 | 1
Basith Penna-Hakkim

Why did you review an automatic?
The manual option was what made the M2 close to the 1M as a driver’s car

12/03/2018 - 19:27 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

Car press should really stop bashing RS cars for “not being good because less engaging”. For most of us going as fast as possible in total security is way more pleasing than popping a vein out of fear of taking a wall on every turn…most of us are not racing drivers. Same goes with the whole “oh..not a manual : dogshit!” debate always bring out by the same snob cavemen :/

12/04/2018 - 03:30 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

You have a fair point that I respect. Sadly it’s just one point in a long list of automotive car journo to do list BS metrics every time they start typing for a piece.

12/04/2018 - 12:43 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

That black paint is so awesome! Also the interior is just perfect…

12/06/2018 - 18:50 |
0 | 0
Sushil manoj

My dream car. Now even more improved.

12/11/2018 - 22:48 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

I have a couple of cars I rent out on Turo, one being a 6-spd 2018 M2. I very much enjoy it as do my customers but after purchasing a 2019 M2C 6-spd last week (for myself) I can say with confidence which one I would rather drive, the Competition. I had put a 100 miles on my friend’s M2C recently up in Angeles Crest (in LA) and was quite impressed and knew I wanted one. The suspension was more buttoned down, brakes were stronger, and just as important the engine felt so much more responsive and enjoyable to wind out.

The N55 while a fine engine doesn’t evoke one to really wind it out, it generally feels just as strong at low revs as it does at higher revs. The S55 in this guise really entices one to push it to the upper revs, BMW did a great job at “throttling” the boost so it doesn’t all come on at 2.5k rpms like it did in my previous 2015 M3, which I really loathed. It reminds me a good deal of driving a S52 M Coupe vs a S54 M coupe, the S52 is fine but the S54 is just that much better being a proper M engine.

Frankly this is my favorite car BMW has put out in quite some time now, I am fortunate to own both versions of the M2 and either one is a great drive but the M2C is just that bit extra that does it for me.

12/31/2018 - 21:20 |
1 | 0

Topics

Manufacturers

Sponsored Posts