The Corvette Z06 Is Not A Supercar

Let’s get this out of the way. The Corvette Z06 is a fantastic sports car. It’s put America properly on the map as a place that can build a high end sports car and dominate that space. It’s a car that is embarrassing it’s competition in higher price brackets by managing to put supercar performance into the hands of people that could otherwise not afford it.

It’s a truly wonderful car.

But it’s not a supercar.

Chevrolet are very eager to tell you it is though, and on their website website you’ll find this little gem:

"Located at the intersection of Le Mans and the autobahn, you’ll find the 2016 Corvette Z06. A true world-class supercar, Z06 was conceived on the track and is engineered with a lightweight and rigid aluminum space frame as well as a supercharged 6.2L aluminum V8 engine delivering 650 horsepower and 650 lb.-ft. of torque.”

You’ll also see this:

Yes, In a hail of marketing nonsense Chevy claim the Corvette Z06 is certified as a supercar. I would love to know who runs this supercar certification program, and I’m sure Lamborghini, Ferrari and Mclaren would be interested as well so they can get their stuff certified to plaster notification all over their websites.

What we have here is Chevy trying to take advantage of the watering down we have had of the term “supercar”.

To understand that though, we need to understand the term supercar and how it gets applied. In the U.S for example, it actually predates the term “muscle car” and was used to describe drag strip development going into rear wheel drive V8 mid size cars in the 60’s and 70’s. During this century the definition has evolved and become clearer. It came to mean a very powerful mid engined car limited in production and sales by cost. A car that is capable on the racetrack, drivable on the road, eye catching in design and with a price tag to match it’s exclusivity. To that end most supercars are mid engined, stylishly designed both inside and out and prohibitively expensive.

Unfortunately, the term has become diluted and over applied to cars that are not super cars but are in fact specialist sports cars. The Corvette Z06 sits in that slot right alongside cars such as the Porsche 911 family, the Nissan GTR, Honda/Acura NSX, and the Lexus RC F.

So, let’s take a look at the Z06 which starts at $79,400. I mentioned price being an element of a supercar and while that’s a lot of money it is attainable to someone that sets their heart on owning one, or someone that is already fairly rich. I know a few people who could go buy one as a toy but I don’t know many that could drop $199,800 on a base Lamborghini Huracan.

That’s like having enough money laying around to go buy a second home to watch depreciate in value.

Whereas new Corvette Z06 money is a great deposit on a new home.

But price is not actually the point, the real issue is the exclusivity of a supercar. Supercars aren’t made for selling in quantity - they simply wouldn’t scale. The price isn’t just random to keep the peasants from owning one. Of course for Ferrari it is, but screw Ferrari.

Let’s instead take the Ford GT as an example, and before anyone in the comments uses the label “hypercar” let’s remember that term only exists because the term supercar has become so diluted.

500 Ford GT’s will be sold in 2017 for $450,000 each. That demonstrates that an American company that makes its money in the everyday road car market can indeed make a real honest to goodness supercar. Badge is not everything, but to get that status they built from scratch a mid engined low production run car with the aim of winning at Le Mans - they didn’t just build the next version of a common car and proclaim that it’s a supercar. We know it’s a supercar and they don’t have to try and brand it as one.

Best of all, they did it to beat Ferrari again.

If you look at any supercar it has something special about it on top of stats. Supercars aren’t only about an expensive game of Top Trumps.

Look at a Ferrari 488 GTB and despite the elitism you are looking at a thing of beauty for the most part. Look at a Lamborghini and you’re looking at something that is oozing vulgarity and money, check out a McLaren and you’re looking at something that is so race car it’s hard to believe its road legal. Look at an Aston Martin Vanquish and you can believe a British spy would drive one because it oozes style and could outrun the bad guys in a death defying chase.

Mostly though, a supercar is built on it’s own platform. I’m not saying a supercar necessarily has to be, after all we have no certification process to define something as a supercar but I suspect we can all agree that there needs to be a certain amount of ingredients to make a car a supercar rather than a specialist car.

You look at a Corvette Z06 though and… it’s an upgraded version of the Stingray sports car that your neighbour keeps in the garage for the weekend drive to an American car meet and while the ZO6 Corvette performs up there with supercars on the track, it’s basically a trim level on a pre existing sports car. It completely lacks the exclusivity, style or prestige associated with a supercar. If you want to give it a term to describe a sports car that is developed to be completely at home dominating a track, the term you are looking for is performance car.

Buying a Corvette Z06 as a supercar is ordering gourmet hamburger and fries at a restaurant while everyone else is having the olive-rosemary bruschetta with oven roasted tomatoes, garlic aioli, pine nuts and fresh basil.

Buying a Corvette Z06 as a specialist sports car though… that’s eighty grand extremely well spent.

You can follow me here

#blogpost

Comments

Dat Incredible Chadkake

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

You convinced me, the ZO6 is not a supercar. But I WILL say that it’s a sports car with supercar performance.

The Ferrari F12 Berlinetta i think is a supercar even though it isn’t mid engined.

08/02/2016 - 16:04 |
1 | 0
Mark Mason

Facts. Still need one, though. Haha.

08/02/2016 - 09:35 |
17 | 0

Hell yeah. I suspect the comments will miss that I would do bad things to drive one, let alone own one.

08/02/2016 - 09:39 |
3 | 3
Anonymous

Agreed :)

08/02/2016 - 09:43 |
2 | 0
Anonymous

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

I’m not sure others will though :p

08/02/2016 - 09:53 |
1 | 1
Ten Tenths Podcast

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

You couldn’t be more correct. The supercar genre is more then just performance stats. It needs to include things like exclusivity, which the corvette is far from. I can go to any local Cars and Coffee and see 5 ZO6s and maybe one F430. Not a supercar….

08/03/2016 - 11:25 |
2 | 2
LittleFun

Never loved corvettes, maybe the pop up headlights one but others are just 👎

08/02/2016 - 09:59 |
1 | 2

I never liked the style, but the performance of the latest versions… hell yes.

08/02/2016 - 10:06 |
0 | 2
Anonymous

I’m just curious. I get the definition of a supercar and I agree as far as the Corvette goes, but you talk a lot about the car being sold in limited numbers, featuring a mid engine design and havimg an exclusive platform.

Then, weirdly, you use the Aston Martin Vanquish as an example of a supercar. That car is a front engined luxury GT that shares its platform with the DB9/DBS and is basically a trim level like the Corvette. The McLaren 650S also shares most of its platform with its lower level siblings. Also, like the Ferrari 488 GTB and Lamborghini Huracan, the McLaren is not sold at a set limited number.

I think you might be right in saying that the term has gotten diluted then. No LFA, no One-77, no SLS/SLR, no Ferrari 599/F12. There’s very little left.

08/02/2016 - 10:07 |
7 | 1
Anonymous

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

I did point out that…

“after all we have no certification process to define something as a supercar but I suspect we can all agree that there needs to be a certain amount of ingredients to make a car a supercar rather than a specialist car.”

I was talking then about it being built on it’s own platform, but the point stands. There needs to be a mixture of high end and performance elements.

Does that make sense?

08/02/2016 - 10:11 |
0 | 5
Dion Cai

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Erm, how about supercars are made for show off, sport cars are made for people with a midlife crisis, hypercars are made for lap times, and and luxury GT cars are made for [insert rich place here]. Of course there will be some overlaps here an there though, but overall this is just my rough thoughts.

08/02/2016 - 10:20 |
1 | 5
Anonymous

The Z06 is in fact a super car, it remains more than just a base Stingray with a slapped on Supercharger. Why create a new platform when it is already so good to begin with, architecture has key role in what makes a supercar, and the stingray has that formula, however not extracted eintriely like the Z06 offers.

This car is beyond the Caliber of performance many here on Carthrottle drive and most individuals of the world drive. By that alone, in a pool of Accords and Camry’s. The Z06 is a super car, and the performance figures speak volumes. Just like the NSX, and varients of the 911 are indeed superior to the average commuter.

And what is wrong with a Gourmet burger? Just because the Corvette will be overlooked by social snobery does not mean it merits it as something less, which many do. Keep in mind it gives a nice beating to a 911 GT3 RS and stepped on the toes of a 918 on VIR. So yes, the Z06 is a supercar by everyday means, and performance measurements. I liked to think as Supercar as something that surpasses the needs of performance for an average driver, as well as something that kicks ass well above it’s weight class and that Z06 has that in Spades.

That being said, I would love an ACR as a daily because I am the type that would buy a burger and fries in a room of people eating bruschetta and caviar.

08/02/2016 - 12:04 |
3 | 0
Anonymous

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

By those standards, something that surpasses the needs of an everyday driver would include any BMW, A Ford Focus RS, A Subaru Impreza, a Mitsubishi Evo,… and so and so on. Same applies if you think anything above a Camry or Accord in terms of peformance is a supercar.

There are a whole bunch of cars beyond the Calibre of cars people drive.

There’s nothing wrong with a gourmet burger and nothing wrong with a Z06. I love both, but I look at them realistically.

Porsche GTR3 RS isn’t a supercar either, like the Z06 it’s a specialist sports car. A performance car. But as I pointed out, a supercar needs more than one ingredient.

08/02/2016 - 12:12 |
4 | 4
Porschephile

Love this article. I don’t know who in the marketing department at GM thought that it would be a great idea to advertise the Z06 as a supercar, but isn’t the Corvette ‘the cheapest sports car’? I always thought of it as it. Is the whole 911 lineup sports car? I don’t think so personally. I have always seen the GT3 RS as a supercar for the most part. As for the run of the mill Carrera, yes, they’re sports car. Love your writing style. Keep it up!

08/02/2016 - 12:22 |
1 | 0

Thanks for the compliment man. I appreciate it.

I consider the GT3 RS as the epitome of the specialty sports car. It’s purpose is to go round a track as fast as possible in a bespoke fashion, but luxury it’s not.

I can see the argument for it being a supercar, and I wouldn’t argue against it too hard to be honest - I might lose.

08/02/2016 - 12:39 |
2 | 2

Sponsored Posts