You Can Now Have A Jaguar XE With The F-Type's 297bhp Four-Pot

Jaguar's powerful new inline-four can now be specced in the XE, XF and F-Pace
You Can Now Have A Jaguar XE With The F-Type's 297bhp Four-Pot

Sharing is most definitely caring in the car industry, so it should come as no surprise that just a couple of months on from announcing a new 297bhp inline-four for the F-Type, Jaguar has confirmed the engine will make its way through the most of the current stable.

The engine is being introduced to the XE, XF and F-Pace ranges. In the XE, that means a 0-62mph time of 5.5 seconds - just half a second down on the XE S, while giving 41.5mpg on the combined cycle, compared to 35 in the S.

You Can Now Have A Jaguar XE With The F-Type's 297bhp Four-Pot

So it’ll be damn near as quick as the range-topping, V6-powered model, but significantly more efficient. It won’t sound as good, of course, but hey - you can’t have everything.

The XF is good for 40mpg combined and a 0-62mph time of 5.6 seconds, and finally the F-Pace SUV musters 37mpg and completes the benchmark sprint in six seconds dead.

You Can Now Have A Jaguar XE With The F-Type's 297bhp Four-Pot

Tempted? You’re looking at £38,145 for the XE, £44,335 for the XF and £44,760 for the F-Pace. That equates to nearly £10,000 less than an XE S, £6765 less than an XF S, and £8605 less than an F-Pace S for a relatively small performance deficit. Option the four-pot Jags to the equivalent of S spec though, and that gap will narrow significantly.

All are available to order now. Would you have one over a V6?

Comments

Anonymous

Dear Jaguar, when is the XE R coming?

06/26/2017 - 11:50 |
18 | 0
Chewbacca_buddy (McLaren squad)(VW GTI Clubsport)(McLaren 60

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

The one with the V8?

06/26/2017 - 12:07 |
2 | 0
Anonymous

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Or the XG?

06/27/2017 - 02:11 |
0 | 0
Poke

When is the XE SVR coming?

06/26/2017 - 12:12 |
3 | 0
Daniel Sadjadian

Looking forward to the V8 :)

06/26/2017 - 12:34 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

but its still an i4 so no thanks

06/26/2017 - 12:52 |
1 | 0
Mark Mason

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Beats walk in! Haha

06/27/2017 - 04:34 |
1 | 0
Alias

Remember when 4 cylinders use to barely break 100 HP at most?

Me neither.

06/26/2017 - 13:38 |
7 | 0
Mark Mason

Is it bad that I want one of these more than any other current European Sedan?

06/27/2017 - 04:33 |
0 | 0

Don’t tell anyone, but i actually like this more than the giulia, and i am a massive alfa fan

06/27/2017 - 16:01 |
0 | 0
TheMindGarage

If I wanted a car for cruising, a four cylinder would be perfect, but I wouldn’t need all that power. If I was looking to buy a powerful saloon like this, I’d want to drive it hard, and I think I’d rather have a V6 for that.

06/27/2017 - 15:56 |
0 | 0

Most of this type of cars are still diesel powered, and those have less power than this 4-pot

06/28/2017 - 08:36 |
0 | 0

Topics

Manufacturers

Sponsored Posts