The BMW M135i And M235i Are Dead: Say Hello To The M140i and M240i

It's another model number change from BMW, with the M135i and M240i each getting a new name and a new engine - the latter making 0-62mph possible in 4.4 seconds
The BMW M135i And M235i Are Dead: Say Hello To The M140i and M240i

Once upon a time, BMW model names would rather neatly tell you size of the engine under the bonnet. Sure, there were a few exceptions, but it’d always give you a rough idea. Then downsizing came along and ruined the party - after all, BMW can’t really have multiple models called ‘320i’ and ‘320d’ now, can it?

So, it’s now better known as a performance index, but the trouble is, we were just getting used to the new naming system when BMW started to change it with the last 3-series facelift. And now, 1 and 2-series ranges have received the same treatment.

The BMW M135i And M235i Are Dead: Say Hello To The M140i and M240i

The M135i and M235i names have been ditched, replaced with M140i and M240i. This applies to all models - the three and five-door hatchback 1ers, and the coupe and cabriolet 2ers.

Displacement and cylinder counts haven’t changed: we’re still looking at 3.0-litre, twin-scroll turbocharged straight-sixes. But, as with when the 335i became the 340i, the engine is actually all-new. The N55 has been ousted, replaced by the modular B58 engine. It’s good for 335bhp and 369lb ft of torque in all models, representing an increase of 14bhp and 37lb ft.

The BMW M135i And M235i Are Dead: Say Hello To The M140i and M240i

Performance figures are identical for the M140i and M240i cabriolet, and are bloody impressive. The AWD ‘xDrive’ versions (not available in the UK, sadly) will do 0-62mph in 4.4 seconds, just a tenth off the mighty M2.

Take away all-wheel drive and that’s bumped up to 4.6 seconds; swap the eight-speed automatic gearbox for a six-speed manual, and that goes up to 4.8. All models are 0.3sec quicker to 62mph than their predecessors, yet enjoy a seven per cent improvement when it comes to emissions and economy.

Also new is an auto rev-matching feature on the six-speed manual, but we’re not sure how we feel about that, as these systems can usually only be disabled by turning off all electronic aids. Meanwhile, the auto gets longer ratios to help fuel economy, and the ability to do multiple downshifts.

The BMW M135i And M235i Are Dead: Say Hello To The M140i and M240i

Want one? You’re looking at £31,875 and up for the M140i, £35,090 for the M240i and £38,535 for the M240i convertible. All of which are actually slightly less than the prices for the outgoing models.

Lower down the pecking order is a new turbocharged 2.0-litre four-pot, which will be installed in the 20i, 25i and 30i models, giving 181bhp, 221bhp and 249bhp respectively. Yep, that means the 228i has a new name too - it’s now the 230i. Each version of the 2.0-litre lump gives a 7bhp boost over the old models, and burns a little cleaner.

Comments

Ralph Semaan

Why can’t they get completely rid of the M240i and stick with the M2?

05/17/2016 - 10:20 |
10 | 6

M2 costs at least £44.000 so I guess now it makes even more sense to buy M240i rather than M2. Unless you want better suspension, aggresive styling and M badges all over the place :p I may be wrong though, because I haven’t driven any

05/17/2016 - 10:27 |
20 | 0

Because these are different cars for different purposes and different pockets?

05/17/2016 - 12:29 |
0 | 0
VQ35DEfan97

BMW are changing their model names as fast and frequently as my friends on deciding where to go to lunch..

05/17/2016 - 10:31 |
108 | 0

Mercedes and BMW… the days of guessing the engine displacement from the name are over..
C 250 doesn’t mean 2.5 liters anymore and 330i doesn’t mean 3.0 liters..

and now we have a BMW 114 and a 140..
I just wonder why they can’t name the 2.0 turbo 25i for example instead of 30i, and the 3.0 30i instead of 40i
I have no clue

05/17/2016 - 12:34 |
32 | 0
Max Schröder

Why did they raise the number while keeping the same engine, making the number even more “incorrect” (seeing how those numbers originally were supposed to indicate the displacement)?

05/17/2016 - 10:44 |
0 | 6

The logic behind it is that its faster than the old version so it needs a higher number

05/17/2016 - 12:07 |
0 | 2
Anonymous

The Germans are getting ridiculous with their nomenclature. Can’t they keep it simple?

05/17/2016 - 10:45 |
36 | 2
Anonymous

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

it is simple ;)

05/17/2016 - 10:51 |
6 | 0
Anonymous

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

its simple for germans xD

05/17/2016 - 11:06 |
28 | 0
VQ35DEfan97

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

I assume this is their way of humor..confusing the rest of us whilst they laugh (silently)

05/17/2016 - 11:25 |
0 | 0
DeKileCH (Opel Squad)

I really salute this. “mtwoforty” is just way easier to say than “mtwothirtyfive”

05/17/2016 - 10:46 |
2 | 0
Anonymous

sigh I’m giving up on those names. There’s no way I can remember all of them.

05/17/2016 - 10:51 |
0 | 0
CarHub

IMO Rev-Matching is great for daily driving, should help with the wear of syncros etc, and the fact that you can turn it off for some heal-and-toeing while spirit-driving is cool. I can’t find what’s wrong with it

05/17/2016 - 10:52 |
6 | 0
Anonymous

In reply to by CarHub

Problem is that you can only disengage it when completely turning off stability control. So if you’re not careful you’ll end up in the ditch while showing off your heel-and-toe skills

05/17/2016 - 11:52 |
4 | 2
Anonymous

Cant tell any difference

05/17/2016 - 11:15 |
0 | 0
Mozes B

Nice. So the new M240 is called after the machine gun? Seems legit.

05/17/2016 - 11:56 |
0 | 0
Smiller

For some reason I will miss the _28i more as a badge name than the _35i

05/17/2016 - 14:13 |
0 | 0

Topics

Manufacturers

Sponsored Posts