6 Classic Muscle Cars That Aren’t American

America created the muscle car, but even in those glory days of the original muscle car era, the concept was truly global
6 Classic Muscle Cars That Aren’t American

What was the first muscle car? In America that’s a hotly-debated question among enthusiasts, and depending on where you’re at, could possibly even lead to a fist fight. To even begin answering that question, one must consider the definition of a muscle car. Some say it’s a basic concept of a big V8 in a small car. Others get far more specific, claiming that muscle cars can only be American-built from the 1960s or early 1970s, running a thumping pushrod V8 to drive a solid rear axle in a two-door, body-on-frame car, regardless of size. I’ve actually seen people come to fisticuffs over that, despite the fact that such an absurd definition excludes the unibody Dodge Charger, perhaps the most famous vintage muscle car in the world.

Sticking to general definitions, many people consider the mid-sized 1949 Oldsmobile Rocket 88 as the first true muscle car. Whereas similar sized models of the day had six-cylinder engines, it got a V8 stuffed under the bonnet.

Flash forward a few years to 1955 and Chrysler’s 300-series “letter cars” with early Hemi engines - that’s where I personally feel the muscle car was born because these cars actually had serious power. But they were also limited-production machines, so some point to the 1955 Chevy with its optional V8 as the beginning. Others jump a few years forward to the 1964 Pontiac GTO as the original muscle car - the machine that actually began the muscle car era.

1955 Chrysler 300
1955 Chrysler 300

Whatever the case, there’s really no question that muscle cars began in America. And they certainly didn’t stay there - today there are all kinds of cars with juvenile-delinquent attitudes turning the rear wheels with thumping V8 engines. But you should know that the original muscle car era wasn’t the exclusive domain of American manufacturers. Our Australian friends can certainly attest to this, but they weren’t the only ones outside America in that original golden age with a few muscle car surprises worth mentioning.

Ford Falcon XB GT

Photo credit: Wikimedia Commons
Photo credit: Wikimedia Commons

I need to start with a personal favourite of mine. Okay, it’s not just a favourite - when my ship comes in I will have a 1974 XB GT, and it may or may not be dressed up as the original Mad Max interceptor. While it’s true that the Ford Falcon started life as an American model in the 1960s, it became exclusively Australian in 1972 with the Falcon XA and it was epic. The minor changes to the XB series in 1973 made it even better, and while American muscle cars were being castrated through emission regulations, the Falcon XB GT soldiered on through the mid-1970s with a 300bhp 5.8-litre V8.

Holden Monaro GTS

Photo credit: Wikimedia Commons
Photo credit: Wikimedia Commons

With ties to General Motors, Australian-based Holden had access to GM’s muscle car engines and they put them to good use in the Monaro. The GTS hit the scene in in 1968 running Chevrolet’s well-known 327 cubic-inch (5.4-litre) V8. That was soon replaced with a 300bhp 5.7-litre V8, and Monaros quickly became racing legends in the Australian Touring Car Championship. I’m a particular fan of the second-generation HQ cars that debuted in 1971, and I’m not the only one. These cars have become quite collectible thanks to their combination of power, great looks and rarity.

Chrysler Valiant Charger R/T

Photo credit: Wikimedia Commons
Photo credit: Wikimedia Commons

The Chrysler Valiant became a stand-alone Australian design in 1971, and among the various sub models was a name already notorious with muscle - the Charger. It wasn’t quite as aggressive as its American counterpart, but the high-output R/T matched the competition from Ford and Holden with a - wait for it - 4.3-litre Hemi straight-six engine. Straight six? That should disqualify the Charger from muscle car status, but here’s the thing. You could get a Valiant Charger 770 with either a 318 (5.2-litre) or 340 (5.6-litre) V8, the latter of which made 275bhp. But the R/T with the Australian-designed Hemi six was a legend; it made 302bhp, and with less weight up front they actually handled pretty well in addition to being faster.

Jensen Interceptor

Photo credit: Wikimedia Commons
Photo credit: Wikimedia Commons

You knew the Jensen had to be on this list, right? Muscular V8 power with a live rear axle; sounds like something straight from Detroit, but of course the Interceptor was hand-built in England. The engine was a product of Detroit though, in this case a 383 cubic-inch (6.2-litre) Chrysler V8 for the early cars and a 440 cubic-inch (7.2-litre) V8 starting in 1971.

It should be noted that the 1971 Jensen Interceptor with the 330bhp 440 “six pack” (three two-barrel carburettors) was Jensen’s most powerful car ever built. Only 232 were made, and as with most cars of the era, power gradually declined until the Interceptor - as well as Jensen - went away completely in 1976.

Remote video URL

Here’s something you probably weren’t expecting. Today Mercedes is all about hairy-chested V8 muscle in a wide range of cars, courtesy of in-house tuner AMG. In 1967, Merc engineers decided to pull an American trick by yanking the six-cylinder mill from the 300SEL and swapping in the 6.3-litre V8 from its much larger 600 limousine. With roughly 250bhp, the V8-powered 300SEL could hit 60mph in just over six seconds and breech 140mph.

When it debuted in 1968 it was the fastest four-door in the world, and when a young upstart company called AMG tweaked it for racing, the car was literally too fast (and admittedly too heavy) for the racing tyres of the day.

Remote video URL

If the straight-six Valiant Charger raised some muscle car eyebrows, I suspect the Italian-built mid-engined Pantera could spark a revolt. Yes, on paper the Pantera is far more supercar than muscle car, but cars are more than published facts and statistics. It was a standout hit in 1971 when it first debuted, but for the Pantera’s entire 20-year run the mid-mounted engine was always a Ford 5.8-litre pushrod V8.

On the road, getting the most from the Pantera was less about finesse and more about manhandling the thing into submission. It might have Italian sex appeal, but even in the sleek design there exists a curious bulkiness that ties to its muscle car heart. I’m not sure there’s a category called super muscle cars, but if there were, the Pantera would be its leader.

Comments

Anonymous

Nice article, though I would class it

03/05/2016 - 17:14 |
2 | 2
benjamin1047

Didn’t Elvis shot his pantera

03/08/2016 - 11:17 |
2 | 0

He did, because it wouldn’t start

03/08/2016 - 11:33 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

What about the Opel Diplomat V8?

03/08/2016 - 11:21 |
130 | 2
boss390

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

I expected it too. It was also fitted with a 5.4L/327CU.IN from the Corvette! It could go 230km/h that was pretty fast for a sedan

03/08/2016 - 11:31 |
20 | 0
David 27

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

I have one in my town, this things looks badass! Never seen in action tho

03/08/2016 - 12:17 |
0 | 0
Sojzim8 3

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

I’d say it’s a full size sedan and not muscle

03/08/2016 - 12:38 |
0 | 2
🎺🎺thank mr skeltal

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Oh yeah, that thing is a beast!

03/08/2016 - 13:27 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

They made a limited run of Coupe’s too, which would definitely qualify.

03/08/2016 - 14:54 |
12 | 0
Chrisco 1

Great article, good to see an Aussie muscle fan Stateside!

Some more honourable mentions are the Holden Torana SL/R 5000, sporting the legendary ‘308’, Ford’s XY Falcon GTHO and of course this Holden HZ Monaro GTS I spotted a couple weeks ago.

03/08/2016 - 11:24 |
22 | 0

Drop tanks are synonymous with Australian Muscle cars. One does not see a modified Aussie Muscle car without an aluminium drop tank

03/08/2016 - 11:25 |
14 | 0
Dzonny the e36 maniaq

In reply to by Chrisco 1

What a beauty!

03/08/2016 - 12:49 |
2 | 0

Yes GTHO should be on there

03/08/2016 - 23:25 |
10 | 0
Anonymous

seen one of those 6 cyl valiant chargers myself, very interesting to say the least (bad quality pic)

03/08/2016 - 11:26 |
6 | 0
James Marshall

Does the Rover SD1 3500 count? Or is it slightly too modern?

03/08/2016 - 12:11 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

Forgot about the Celica 2000GT Liftback?

03/08/2016 - 12:25 |
0 | 0
Jase Jackson

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Kinda low on power to be a muscle car. I do love the looks of the TA22 though.

03/08/2016 - 12:36 |
4 | 0
Eric Mark X

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Nah. The TA22 Celica looks like a muscle car, but had coils and independent suspension and not to mention the 2T-G engine; a 1.6L straight 4. Though very awesome, you can’t really classify that as muscle.

03/08/2016 - 12:42 |
0 | 0
Igor Konuhov

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

2.2 liter engine… muscle cars. Those things are like on the different continents

03/08/2016 - 14:50 |
2 | 0
Jase Jackson

Well done, well done. Good to see we get recognised for our equally, if not more insane desires to put V8’s in things. And the Valiant was a beast. My dad had one back in the glory days (as well as numerous Monaros, old Holdens and ).

03/08/2016 - 12:35 |
4 | 0
Anonymous

Aston Martin V8 Vantage 1977 ??

03/08/2016 - 12:37 |
0 | 0
Thimo Roelofs

Ford capri???

03/08/2016 - 12:42 |
2 | 0

Topics

Sponsored Posts