Who Killed The Sports Coupe?
Trends in the automotive market seem to come and go on a fairly short-term basis. At least in the American market, that is, where we’ve got the collective attention span of ADD-riddled 4th graders. What was hot last year is old news this year, and anything from the year before that has long since been forgotten. And while this is easily applicable to individual cars -- witness the dramatic rise in popularity and precipitous fall of cars like the PT Cruiser, Thunderbird, New Beetle, Audi TT, and about 14 million other “cars of the minute” - if you look at the market as a whole, it’s applicable to entire segments. The minivan was the preferred mode of family transportation for a good decade and a half -- starting around 1984 -- but these days only one out of three of the mainstream domestic brands even bother to make a minivan. The Sport Utility Vehicle exploded onto the scene, with cars like the Ford Explorer, Jeep Cherokee, and Isuzu Trooper (remember Isuzu?) being the faces that launched a thousand clones, from Acura to Volvo.
And while very little of this really saddens me all that much (you can’t tell me you miss the road being clogged up with body-on-frame SUV’s being driven by one tiny housewife going to get the groceries!), what truly saddens me is the apparent death of the small, light, inexpensive sports coupe. It was once one of the most hotly contested market segments, with just about every major mainstream manufacturer dipping their toe -- or their whole foot -- into the water. Today, it’s a segment that’s deader than Lindsay Lohan’s career prospects.
The sports coupe segment used to be a churning, active, busy segment -- because that’s what people (at least, young people) wanted. It’s hard to admit, but 20-somethings lost the plot when their interest moved from Integra to Xterra. Still, this is perhaps due to the gullibility of young people -- who believe they want whatever it is that’s being marketed to them, even if it’s a Nissan Frontier with a bunch of plastic glued to it that’s supposed to grant you some sort of crazy “lifestyle.”
There’s more to it than just marketing, though. The focus on cars has gone from size, horsepower, and luxury (all good things in my mind!) to environmental friendliness, efficiency, and the lifestyle the car’s supposed to portray. Quite why people got tired of sharp handling and handfuls of horsepower is beyond me, but maybe we can chalk that one up to rising gas prices and skyrocketing insurance premiums across the industry.
Still, the almost full-scale death of the sports coupe is a hard pill to swallow when you compare the past to the present. Let’s take a look at how the market has slowly died. I’m going to start with the brand that was long considered the king of the sports coupe market: Honda.
Back in the 80′s and 90′s, Honda basically owned this market. They had a fun 2-door for basically every need. The CR-X was a midget-wheelbase 2-seat liftback based on the Civic, available in hyper-mileage (HF) or lots-of-fun (Si) format. The Prelude was Honda’s testbed for hot new technology, and it was always a harbinger of what was to come in the industry, technologically speaking. 4-wheel-steering? Prelude. Variable Valve Timing? Prelude. Active torque-vectoring differentials? Prelude. (Yup, the Prelude Type SH in 1998 was the very first.) You get the point. Then there was the Integra, which I hardly need to explain -- think Prelude technology in a smaller, lighter package. It’s still a massively popular car (with suitably ridiculous resale values) nearly a decade after it went out of production. See Edmund’s comparison of an Integra Type-R and a brand-new Civic Si if you don’t believe me.
Is it a coincidence that the Prelude died about the same time that Honda brought out the Element? Apparently the market wanted a box based on the CR-V with rubber bumpers and no power. Think of this: the special edition of the Prelude had that trick torque-vectoring front differential. The special edition of the Element has a ramp for dogs. This is progress?
How about Mitsubishi? Once upon a time, the three diamond brand was swimming in money and couldn’t keep Eclipses on the showroom floor long enough to vacuum the carpets and fill the gas tank. Turbo 16v motors with tons of power, sophisticated four-wheel-drive, cool interiors, sexy styling, and a low price tag. They replaced the real Eclipse (and by real I obviously mean DSM) in 1999 with an automotive abortion still clinging to the Eclipse label, a Chrysler Sebring Coupe in drag with a duller-than-dirty-dishwater 3.0 V6 as the optional powerplant. It gained a bunch of weight, lost all it’s driver appeal, and went to the mass market. I think they still make the Eclipse, but I’m not going to pretend to care. And how’s Mitsubishi doing today? Hanging on by a thread, thanks for asking. Let’s not even talk about the Starion, I don’t feel like crying.
The worst offender is obviously Toyota. Let’s go back to, say, 1993. Go to a Toyota dealer looking for a sports coupe and you had tons of choices. Want to spank Ferraris? $40k would buy you a 320bhp twin-turbo Supra with a 6-speed. Want to pretend you’re a rally driver? About $25k would buy you a Celica all-Trac, which had four-wheel-drive and a 16v Turbo 3S-GTE motor good for 200+bhp. Want a lightweight, reliable, mid-engine RWD two-seater? $20k or so would get your butt in an MR2 Turbo. Hell, you could even get a Paseo with a drop-top! What about today? A whole lotta nothing. Can you honestly say that there’s a fun-to-drive Toyota today? Not to mention that it’ll probably try to kill you as it accelerates through your neighbor’s lawn.
The saddest part of Toyota’s sports coupe story is undoubtedly that of the Celica. When it left production in 2005, the Celica was perhaps one of the best-handling and most fun-to-drive front wheel drive cars out there, especially in GT-S form. With the Yamaha-engineered 2ZZ-GE under the hood (which I’ve proclaimed my adoration for multiple times) spitting out 180 screaming valve-lift horsepower, a shockingly light curb weight, and an interior that fit like a glove, it was a car for people that loved to drive. With a few choice suspension modifications (and some sticky tires!) the last of the Celica GT-S’s could attack an on-ramp like nothing you’ve ever seen. It’s “replacement,” the Scion tC, was a mass-market sororitymobile based on the boring European Toyota Avensis, powered by an even more boring 2.4L Toyota Camry engine. While the Celica GT-S bragged about it’s 8500rpm fuel cut, rifle-bolt 6 speed manual, and corner-muching abilities, the tC bragged about things like fancy stereo head units, a long sunroof, and back seats that reclined.
America once new how to build a decent lightweight sports coupe, too. Remember the original Ford Probe GT Turbo? Sure, it was mostly Mazda, but it was a hoot. The Dodge Daytona of the 80′s, at least in Turbo Shelby form, was an amusing torque-steering little bastard that liked to munch on Z-28′s. Hell, even the early Neon ACR coupes are still prized by (their admittedly unusual) fans for light weight, sharp handling, and easy modification. Today, not so much. The Camaro and Challenger are both overweight, undertalented and oversized Retro-mobiles with no real sporting pretensions beyond 1/4 mile ET’s. The Mustang is the same as it’s ever been, which is great for Mustang fans, but not for people that like turning. The last coupe Chrysler made that handled well (the Crossfire, remember that?) wasn’t even a Chrysler, being a reskinned Mercedes Benz SLK320.
Nissan forgot, too. I’m not going to say that the 370Z and the GT-R aren’t totally awesome; they are. But neither are affordable or uncomplicated or particularly light. How about in the early 90′s? You had your choice of the hellacious twin-turbo 300ZX, the nimble and simple rear-wheel-drive 240SX, the egg-shaped but corner-carving NX2000, the Sentra SE-R Coupe, and even that funky Pulsar deal with the changeable back end. Today? Mmm, Altima Coupe. That’s just what we want, Nissan -- a family sedan with a sexy roofline. Thanks, but no thanks.
But despite making no sense at all, the SUV brigade rolled in with huge knobby tires, horrible mileage, and fabricated usefulness. And the sports coupes died off, one-by-one. There are no more mid-engined turbocharged Toyotas; but your dealer will happily sell you a Matrix! The Integra is dead, but Acura’s got the jack-o-lantern RDX cute-ute, which does nothing well besides making Honda enthusiasts cry that such a sweet motor went into such a goofy contraption. Mazda’s rotary wonder gained two doors, but lost two turbos as well as any convincing reason for existance. Sure, the lithe two doors remained in some places, but only with disproportionally large price tags: The Audi TT has always been gorgeous, but why pay twice as much for a less useful GTI? The Z4 M Coupe was fantastic, but not many 20-somethings can afford a 50+ thousand dollar rocket.
It seems though, as reality sets in these days (“My Jeep Liberty is smaller than a Taurus inside but gets 15mpg, and I never go off-road. Why’d I do this?”) that perhaps the tide is turning back towards affordable cars that are fun to drive. Hyundai’s 2010 Genesis Coupe (video review) may not be perfect, and it may not be setting the sales charts on fire just yet -- but it’s the real deal. Manageable price tag, sexy styling, a choice of appealing powertrains, and balanced handling thanks to rear-wheel-drive make it the kind of car we’ve been missing here for years. Toyota swears up and down they’re going to produce the FT-86 concept, a small rear-wheel-drive coupe powered by a 2.0L Subaru boxer engine, and I’m keeping my fingers crossed. And while it may not make much sense on paper, initial reports on Honda’s CR-Z Hybrid sports coupe have been very promising -- imagine it with the 2.0L K20C from the Civic Si and no hybrid garbage!
So it seems that the market is finally recovering from the confusion of many years of pointless SUV’s and cute-utes and crossover nonsense. The future is indeed bright for people that like to drive.

Follow us on Twitter







Another solid editorial, James. Kudos. Your K&N thinking cap must be working! ;)
I think Hyundai really gets it these days. They seem to have something for everyone. From the small, sporty Genesis Coupe to the modestly sized, well equipped Sonata, to the big boat Genesis sedan. They’re being smart about things.
Ford could have a real winner on their hands if the Fiesta ends up being as much fun to drive as I think it will be. Likewise, with the Focus. We might not get the madcap RS version Stateside with the hot engine and trick gearbox, but if they deliver a good driving experience with a heaping spoonful of interior appointments, I think they’ll have a couple entry-level success stories.
I miss the DSM, but I can understand the predicament Mitsubishi in which Mitsubishi found themselves. With the arrival of the Evo, what place was there for a turbocharged, all wheel drive Eclipse? Especially when the Eclipse and Sebring are made in Illinois, while the Evo comes over on a boat from Japan. Still, they’ve offered a detuned version of the Evo powertrain in the Lancer Ralliart Sportback. Could this be a step towards an Eclipse renaissance? I don’t know (but I’ll ask them). Word on the street is that the next Lancer Evo will be a hybrid, so who knows.
Let’s keep our hopes up. The small, sporty car has been around a long time. It was the “hot hatches” that really transformed the tuner market, leading to the arrival of giant killers like the Evo and WRX. Nearly every manufacturer has a small hatch coming out and people are demanding more performance out of them. Sure, most of the sheep just want appliances that drive themselves and have iTool connectivity, but consider the promise of the new class of cars arriving soon…
Fiat 500
Alfa Romeo MiTo
Ford Fiesta
Mazda 2
Audi A1
Mitsubishi Colt
Even industry dullards, GM, are making an Aveo RS. Where there are affordable, nimble hatchbacks, there will be people eager to soup them up. Hope is not lost. Remember, those who do not know history are destined to repeat it…
I love CarThrottle articles, but this article has such unfortunate timing–the 2011 Mustang GT with the DOHC TiVCT 5.0L V8 just became available for roadtesting and it is fifteen or sixteen tenths of a winner! Apparently underrated at SAE-certified 412 HP and 390 ft lbs, too!
.91-.94 Gs, 105-109 ft stops from 60 MPH, 4.5 sec-4.8 sec 0-60s, and 12.80s-13.00s in the standing start quarter mile. Best slalom & figure-eight times in the market (check the dozen or so articles that have just hit the www for the slalom/figure-eight particulars). And 26 MPG to boot! Much improved interior materials, slick 6-speed manuals & autos, and splendid options (like 14-inch Brembos that don’t require lead weights glued to the calipers to do their jobs)–did I mention 412 HP and 390 ft lbs? And the new DOHC DAMB TiVCT 3.7l V6 performs about evenly with the Challenger S/E (admittedly climbing a tiny mountain…) and may become an SCCA hero. Best of all, 3603 pounds for the Mustang GT coupe–no, wait–best of all is the pricing for the best affordable performance car on Earth! Did I leave out 412 HP and 390 ft lbs?
Get one. Drive it. Report it. That’s all. Thanks for the time and the opportunity to point out the incredibly unfortunate timing issue here!
I will agree that the 2011 Mustangs are absolutely fantastic (on paper; I’ll reserve judgement till I drive one) but that doesn’t change the basic idea of this article – it’s sad that the Mustang is one of a handful of really good sports coupes on the market. I am pleased as can be that Ford has stepped up to the plate and is delivering a world-class sports car with the Mustang name plate, but the fact is that there aren’t all that many good inexpensive sports coupes on the market. One awesome Ford doesn’t bring a dead segment back to life. Again, I’m not disagreeing – the 2011′s are freaking awesome – but I wish there were more choices in this segment!
I see what you’re saying, James. Maybe I wasn’t clear enough on where I was coming from.
What’s a sports car?
Mustang, Camaro, Supra, Celica, MR2, Eclipse/Talon/Laser, 3000GT, FTO, SVX, S2000, Integra, Silvia, Fairlady, X90…
(That last one was just to mess with people.)
But why did people shy away from those models, initially? Perhaps some people sought greater utility in their vehicles. All of those platforms were (and remain) wonderful models which deliver an entertaining driving experience and the possibility of astronomical performance, but they aren’t much for utility. Sure, there was a four door Integra, and the DSM had an absolutely cavernous hatch, but meh.
I think the transition really began with the small, hot hatches. Honda and Volkswagen might have got the ball rolling with the Civic and Rabbit, but I feel that, once Mitsubishi entered the fray with their turbocharged Colts (and twin Suzuki Swift), the whole game changed.
Now the emphasis was on small, utilitarian, inexpensive, cars with enough spunk to really hustle. They were game changers. Honda stuck with natural aspiration – VTEC – and Volkswagen opted for turbos. Both models moved upscale. Both are heavier than their forefathers too.
Eventually, this trend for zippy, utilitarian hatchbacks moved into smaller coupes and sedans. Enter the DSM, the Lancer Evolution, the Legacy, the Impreza WRX. Models tend to grow fatter and lazier as the demographic gets fatter and lazier. Believe it or not, the Lancer Evo X is the only trim level of that car still called Lancer. The rest are called GALANT because it’s – technically – too big to be a Lancer anymore. These smaller slots are going to need to be filled.
91 octane just hit $3.01/gallon here in Phoenix. I expect it to keep going up, especially through summer. The days of the gargantuan SUVs are numbered. People will shift to crossovers, but even those will take a hit, given high enough gas prices. In the end, I expect there will be a greater demand for smaller cars – smaller cars that perform. All these choads in the Tahoes and whatnot are used to driving their V8s like they’re Corvettes. They will demand more miles per gallon, an upscale interior, and a right pedal that does something.
I just hope we get the hot hatches selling again before these damn hybrid afterbirths take over the world.
The utility factor makes sense, but young people have never been super-concerned about practical considerations in their cars. Otherwise, why are there so many Mini Coopers on the road?
Still, if I can’t have a lightweight sports coupe, I’ll gladly take a lightweight hot hatchback. I’m just saying, I’d prefer a coupe if I want a fun-to-drive car while I’m young. Save the hot hatches for the 40 year olds getting out of their Ta-ho’s.
I could not agree more. I’m 24 and was in the market a couple of months ago. I looked every nook and corner for Celicas and Preludes, but the only ones I found were trashed by their previous 6 owners and had a million miles on them, which wasn’t surprising considering they went out of production more than half a decade ago. I had to eventually settle for a hot hatch – an ’04 Civic Si, which is fun with a stick shift and 160hp, but I still can’t stop feeling jealous every time I see a Celica on the road. I’d still have preferred the Civic Type-R from Europe though, with a bucketload more horsepower.
I think the 06-08 Civic Si’s (and the earlier Acura RSX Type S) come pretty close to sports coupe ideals. I really like the seats and shifter in the EP3 Si hatch, though, but wish we had gotten the 6 speed/LSD/valve lift K20A from the CTR!
James: Thank you for the prompt and courteous reply!
The Nethead here absolutely agrees that you should “… reserve judgement till I drive one…” (Ford would like that “Drive One” part). The usual suspects are gushing about both the basic 2011 Mustang 3.7L V6 and the 2011 Mustang GT 5.0L V8–but that hardly means that you will! I’m guilty of a little second-hand gushing myself, but I got no pull that would let me loose on a 2011 Mustang GT for a coupla days of thrashin’-bashin’-just-short-o’-crashin’ antics. If I did have that moxie, I’d be out on the roads, tracks, and dragstrips gatherin’ data on the Mustang GT. Alas…
Unlike many, I see the marketplace as offering too many models of everything (not just sport coupes)–resulting in the splitting up of sales of all these proliferating models into such tiny pieces of the pie that no one sells enough of any one model to realize the volume of profits that’s necessary to continue to produce that model–with virtually nothing left over to substantially improve that model. I fear this vehicular Darwinism will erode to become the survival of the cheapest. I don’t want to see this market owned by Genesissies–or to see Mustang GTs being decontented to compete with Genesissies pricewise.
I don’t have the key to preventing this. Improving the vehicles is the best solution (the “Mustang Approach” since roughly the 2000 Cobra R, although not enough for the Nethead here to notice it until 2004), but volume of sales is not directly proportional to volume of improvements, lamentable as that is. The marketplace applauds with its billfolds–and I hope the best sport coupes draw that applause often…
Thank you for the opportunity to state what’s probably a minority viewpoint–but I think everyone who wants sport coupes available in the marketplace should consider the risks that overproliferation may present to having ANY sports coupes available in the marketplace.
Keep up the good work!
The Nethead here
Wow!What a perfect editorial. I found myself nodding and agreeing the whole way through. And feeling older and older. I used to have a Daytona, and it was sooo much fun. Today you cant find a decent coupe anywhere.
Anybody remember the NSX?? A ferrari killer? For $60,000