<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Next Alfa Romeo 166 To Be Built in NA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.carthrottle.com/next-alfa-romeo-166-to-be-built-in-na/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.carthrottle.com/next-alfa-romeo-166-to-be-built-in-na/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:47:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian DR1665</title>
		<link>http://www.carthrottle.com/next-alfa-romeo-166-to-be-built-in-na/#comment-6891</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian DR1665</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carthrottle.com/?p=10409#comment-6891</guid>
		<description>Decent potential on that deal.  Thank god they&#039;re not talking about basing new Alfas on the Sebring platform.  

One drawback to using the 300C platform is that none of the new Dodge RWD cars are particularly good handlers...  Well, nowhere near what you would expect of an Alfa.  Let&#039;s hope that &quot;tuning&quot; implies chassis tuning and not just an ECU reflash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Decent potential on that deal.  Thank god they&#8217;re not talking about basing new Alfas on the Sebring platform.  </p>
<p>One drawback to using the 300C platform is that none of the new Dodge RWD cars are particularly good handlers&#8230;  Well, nowhere near what you would expect of an Alfa.  Let&#8217;s hope that &#8220;tuning&#8221; implies chassis tuning and not just an ECU reflash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

