<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chevrolet Volt To Be Sportier Than Rivals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.carthrottle.com/chevrolet-volt-to-be-sportier-than-rivals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.carthrottle.com/chevrolet-volt-to-be-sportier-than-rivals/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 21:25:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.carthrottle.com/chevrolet-volt-to-be-sportier-than-rivals/comment-page-1/#comment-3992</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 21:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carthrottle.com/?p=6833#comment-3992</guid>
		<description>I think that would be an interesting idea as sort of a green performance halo. I know Cadillac is planning a vehicle based on the Voltec but I doubt it will be similar to what you&#039;re saying. Yeah, the Volt and Prius are similar. They both are being designed for the best possible efficiency and that leads them to the same basic shape. 

I do think it&#039;s possible for the Volt to find success though due to it&#039;s unique powertrain. We&#039;ll see how it fares in the market. I definitely wouldn&#039;t expect it to be a performance stunner though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that would be an interesting idea as sort of a green performance halo. I know Cadillac is planning a vehicle based on the Voltec but I doubt it will be similar to what you&#8217;re saying. Yeah, the Volt and Prius are similar. They both are being designed for the best possible efficiency and that leads them to the same basic shape. </p>
<p>I do think it&#8217;s possible for the Volt to find success though due to it&#8217;s unique powertrain. We&#8217;ll see how it fares in the market. I definitely wouldn&#8217;t expect it to be a performance stunner though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian DR1665</title>
		<link>http://www.carthrottle.com/chevrolet-volt-to-be-sportier-than-rivals/comment-page-1/#comment-3982</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian DR1665</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 18:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carthrottle.com/?p=6833#comment-3982</guid>
		<description>At this stage of the game, &quot;sporty&quot; and &quot;hybrid&quot; are mutually exclusive.  By it&#039;s very nature, sport/spirited driving consumes more energy - hybrid or conventional.  If you want to build a sporty hybrid, then don&#039;t make it look anything like a Prius (which we all know it does).  It&#039;s hard to believe the Volt is being designed to be the best when it&#039;s not a stretch to think that GM is using the Prius as a guide (like everyone else, for that matter).

I think GM shouldn&#039;t be so much focused on competing with the Prius, as they&#039;re going to lose.  You can&#039;t take a bankrupt juggernaut known for everything that is wrong with the American car industry, and suddenly set your sights on the pinnacle of efficient Japanese precision and expect to pull a hail Mary.  If all you&#039;re doing is throwing the ball as hard as you can from your own end zone time and again, you&#039;re just not going to win.  Period.  

If GM was smart, they&#039;d be looking into a completely different market.  There&#039;s ONLY ONE vehicle that the people who enjoy driving &quot;sporty&quot; vehicles would consider buying - if it wasn&#039;t so expensive.  It&#039;s the Tesla.  It&#039;s not even a hybrid.  Pure, electric power (derived from the local, coal-fired generating station).  GM should be taking something like the now defunct Solstice/Sky platform and building their hybrid on that.  Give it a sub-frame full of lithium-ion and drop a fat motor in the trunk which has room for little else.  Keep the direct injected turbo-4 up front and the rear wheel drive.  Keep it a convertible.  It&#039;s small, light, powerful, and fun to drive.  Hybridize that, keep the price under $40K, and watch people buy them hand over fist.

Just my random thoughts on the subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At this stage of the game, &#8220;sporty&#8221; and &#8220;hybrid&#8221; are mutually exclusive.  By it&#8217;s very nature, sport/spirited driving consumes more energy &#8211; hybrid or conventional.  If you want to build a sporty hybrid, then don&#8217;t make it look anything like a Prius (which we all know it does).  It&#8217;s hard to believe the Volt is being designed to be the best when it&#8217;s not a stretch to think that GM is using the Prius as a guide (like everyone else, for that matter).</p>
<p>I think GM shouldn&#8217;t be so much focused on competing with the Prius, as they&#8217;re going to lose.  You can&#8217;t take a bankrupt juggernaut known for everything that is wrong with the American car industry, and suddenly set your sights on the pinnacle of efficient Japanese precision and expect to pull a hail Mary.  If all you&#8217;re doing is throwing the ball as hard as you can from your own end zone time and again, you&#8217;re just not going to win.  Period.  </p>
<p>If GM was smart, they&#8217;d be looking into a completely different market.  There&#8217;s ONLY ONE vehicle that the people who enjoy driving &#8220;sporty&#8221; vehicles would consider buying &#8211; if it wasn&#8217;t so expensive.  It&#8217;s the Tesla.  It&#8217;s not even a hybrid.  Pure, electric power (derived from the local, coal-fired generating station).  GM should be taking something like the now defunct Solstice/Sky platform and building their hybrid on that.  Give it a sub-frame full of lithium-ion and drop a fat motor in the trunk which has room for little else.  Keep the direct injected turbo-4 up front and the rear wheel drive.  Keep it a convertible.  It&#8217;s small, light, powerful, and fun to drive.  Hybridize that, keep the price under $40K, and watch people buy them hand over fist.</p>
<p>Just my random thoughts on the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
