<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cadillac DTS Replacement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.carthrottle.com/cadillac-dts-replacement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.carthrottle.com/cadillac-dts-replacement/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:47:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.carthrottle.com/cadillac-dts-replacement/#comment-3993</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 21:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carthrottle.com/?p=6937#comment-3993</guid>
		<description>Yeah, this is more of the same thinking that got them to where they are right now. What I don&#039;t get is the comment about G8 rebadging. If the G8 is no longer a Pontiac any more, how could reskinning it to make it a Chevrolet (or even if done heavily enough, a Cadillac) make it a &quot;rebadge&quot;? 

Cadillac deserves more than this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, this is more of the same thinking that got them to where they are right now. What I don&#8217;t get is the comment about G8 rebadging. If the G8 is no longer a Pontiac any more, how could reskinning it to make it a Chevrolet (or even if done heavily enough, a Cadillac) make it a &#8220;rebadge&#8221;? </p>
<p>Cadillac deserves more than this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian DR1665</title>
		<link>http://www.carthrottle.com/cadillac-dts-replacement/#comment-3980</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian DR1665</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 18:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carthrottle.com/?p=6937#comment-3980</guid>
		<description>OMG.  Seriously?  They&#039;ve already cloned the Insignia into the Malibu and now they want to relegate the grand daddy of all Cadillacs to feeble, front wheel drive mediocrity?  Here&#039;s an idea, given the popularity of the Camaro these days, why not LEARN SOMETHING FROM THE MARKET and start from scratch on your flagship?  

We&#039;ve all been up in arms about their neglect of the G8 as they just don&#039;t wanna, but now they actually have a CASE for a full sized (if not AS full sized) V8-powered, rear wheel drive sedan, they actually have a candidate, and yet they&#039;re talking about turning an already badge engineered car into yet ANOTHER badge engineered car.  

If they&#039;re going to keep acting this way, they need to seriously reconsider their &quot;GM:reinvent&quot; slogan.  They are NOT reinventing right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG.  Seriously?  They&#8217;ve already cloned the Insignia into the Malibu and now they want to relegate the grand daddy of all Cadillacs to feeble, front wheel drive mediocrity?  Here&#8217;s an idea, given the popularity of the Camaro these days, why not LEARN SOMETHING FROM THE MARKET and start from scratch on your flagship?  </p>
<p>We&#8217;ve all been up in arms about their neglect of the G8 as they just don&#8217;t wanna, but now they actually have a CASE for a full sized (if not AS full sized) V8-powered, rear wheel drive sedan, they actually have a candidate, and yet they&#8217;re talking about turning an already badge engineered car into yet ANOTHER badge engineered car.  </p>
<p>If they&#8217;re going to keep acting this way, they need to seriously reconsider their &#8220;GM:reinvent&#8221; slogan.  They are NOT reinventing right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

