2010 Lincoln MKT Test Drive and Review
Lincoln has shown signs of promise in its recent concepts and products. Certain products have come along that have proven to be hits for the brand, like the original RWD LS sedan. After meeting success with that model though, development stagnated and the car was left to wither in the marketplace.
Now comes a new period for Lincoln as it refocuses its direction. The MKT is an example of that new era for Lincoln, but is it everything a Lincoln should be? Let’s find out!
As Executive Design Director for Ford’s American brands, Peter Horbury created Lincoln’s new design language and was responsible for the original MKS, MKR and MKT concepts. He also oversaw the adaptation of it to production vehicles like the MKS, updated MKZ and the MKT. He has now returned to Volvo as Vice President of Design.
Whilst some judgements can certainly be made by viewing pictures, many times the case has proven to be different when viewed in real life. This design has proved to generate a wide range of reactions in the automotive world and blogosphere.
Successful designs in the past have often caused that sort of a reaction. Take for instance, the BMW styling theme introduced by Chris Bangle. While I have never been a fan of that theme, BMW has gone on to become more successful than ever with the vehicles resulting from it.
Classic American chrome accents play a big part on the exterior and interior alike on the 2010 Lincoln MKT. The huge waterfall grille dominates the front end, with a chrome border line that extends from underneath the base of the grille to beneath the front headlights. Luxury is about detail, and here the MKT excels.
Other than the vertical grille, horizontal lines dominate – small chrome strips on the door handles, above the rocker panels, and engrained into the LED rear taillight (a horizontal piece itself).
Horizontal taillights are making a comeback at Lincoln, featuring prominently on the MKX, MKT and updated MKZ. It makes for a distinctive light graphic, especially at night. As a design cue, no-one can mistake that.
Something particularly striking about the MKT is the use of classic Lincoln cues in the crossover’s styling. The 1940 Lincoln Zephyr serves as inspiration for the winged Lincoln grille, and “birds beak” crease on the hood. The overall look is bold, exuding luxury and class. The MKT is a Lincoln and proud of it!
In person (and I stress, in the right color) the car takes on a different, far more dynamic personality than in press photography. It retains much of the look that the MKT Concept displayed. For instance, from the side you can see the chrome-bordered expanse of glass that appears uninterrupted. On the inside however, the third row has a separate window. The C-pillar has been blacked out and a black cover put into place to create an uninterrupted flow. It’s a nice design touch.
There are other things that aren’t immediately apparent from images – for instance the extension of the door rocker panels to the bottom of the vehicle, keeping the insides of the door clean.
In the beginning, I could be counted among those who felt the production MKT didn’t live up the the promise of the concept. After spending time with it and seeing it in person, that impression changed. I look forward to checking out the MKT in a variety of colors once it hits dealerships over the next few months.
No-one is denying the MKT is a polarizing design though – Lincoln intended the crossover to make a bold statement about the brand, which it has done. That said, nearly all feedback I have received has been good – particularly that from discerning crowds. I was consistently stopped by people asking when the Lincoln MKT would be on sale. Driving through the streets of downtown San Francisco resulted in head turns, both from passersby and drivers of would-be rivals Audi, Mercedes, Acura and the like.
Spaceships don’t have keys. Cue the Shiny Toy Guns rendition of the classic David Bowie track Major Tom. Stepping into the MKT reveals an entirely new interior approach for Lincoln, one that started with the MKS sedan. Back in 2006 the Fusion-based Zephyr debuted. Since then, a lot has changed for Lincoln. The brand introduced a new MK-(T,X,S,Z) naming convention as well as a dramatic change in design direction never more evident than in the MKT’s interior.
The Zephyr’s interior was in the style of Art Deco with rigid, rectangular shapes and an upright center stack. Vestiges of this design period for Lincoln can be seen currently on the Lincoln Navigator SUV. On the MKZ I quite liked the theme, but the MKT’s has broader appeal.
The overall design of the interior design is flowing, with the upper dash curving into the center stack that gets smaller heading into the cup holder area.
Whilst this was a preproduction tester, quality and attention to detail were top notch. The dash and door panels are covered with high-quality leather and panel gaps are tight. As I said before, luxury is in the details and small touches can be found everywhere; chrome-ringed speaker surrounds, control knobs and seat belt loops along with dual center console latches for driver and passenger.
The aluminum trim perhaps best illustrates the difference, lending the interior a techy, sports-oriented feel that serves as an exclamation point to the change in direction for Lincoln. The aluminum trim piece appears to continue uninterrupted under the center stack, coming out on the other side near the steering wheel.
Not surprisingly, Lincoln lists the Acura MDX, another technologically-laden crossover, as one of the MKT’s chief competitors. While I prefer the wood trim option that would make the interior have a jet-like ambiance, the aluminum fits well with Lincoln’s advertising campaign.
In fact, of all the new Lincolns, the MKT is perhaps best positioned for capitalizing on those advertisements. With a push button starter, 7-inch high resolution touchscreen, and second-row bucket seats, “spaceship” was a common refrain. Jet-like, spaceship-like…either one works.
Quality of leather in the Lincoln was superb – the MKT uses leather from Bridge of Weir, a Scottish company that was the original supplier of leather for the Model T and the 1951 Lincoln Continental. Only 20 production cars today use Bridge of Weir leather, including the Lincoln MKS sedan.
The second row is dominated by the flow-through center console, a piece that extends from the center stack of the vehicle to a bit behind the bucket seats. From above, the view is particularly striking. The rear is as sumptuous a place as the front, with the seats heated or cooled to your liking. Simply put. the experience is as luxurious as they come.
If there is a complaint back here, it would have to be space. Unfortunately the dramatic rear roofline renders the third row seating pretty much a kid-only zone. However, the same can be said for most similar vehicles on the market, albeit for different reasons (like legroom). At first the second row appears small due to the unique design and black color. That is not the case though, as space in all directions is generous.
At night the interior comes alive, with ambient lighting illuminating the front cup holders, footwells and the front and rear door panels. A button on the dash can cycle through the various colors or turn off the ambient lighting entirely if you so desire. Pictures of the night lighting can be found in our CarThrottle gallery of the MKT photo shoot.
OK so we’ve covered the exterior and the interior, but what about the driving experience? The MKT doesn’t drive like the huge crossover it is. As can be expected, the EcoBoost engine dominates the experience. This is a gem of an engine – quiet, refined and powerful.
355hp of direct-injected, twin-turbocharged V-6 power that moves the near 5000lb MKT to the 60 mph mark in a scant 6.1 seconds (as quoted by Car & Driver). That is incredible! Perhaps best of all, power delivery is instantaneous. It has truly lived up to the hype surrounding the motor, which is difficult to do.
There is more to a driving experience than just the engine though. Here as well, the MKT excels at offering more than just straight-line power. No one is expecting this to be a sportscar, but past Lincolns have had the tendency to wallow.
At nearly all speeds the MKT feels composed and confident, with a taut (but never punishing) ride quality. With handling tested at speed, there was a minimal amount of body roll. This was quite a surprise! For a three-row luxury crossover, it’s hard to expect any more.
Technologically, the MKT is at the cutting edge. This is another area where Lincoln and other American manufacturers have been lagging. That gap has been erased, as the MKT (and MKS and MKZ as well) illustrates. The 8-inch touchscreen is the centerpiece of the Lincoln’s interior, housing controls for the radio, climate system, Sirius Travel Link and if so equipped, the Navigation system.
The user interface is top notch and very easy to use. The MKT also offers a lot of the functions on the screen to be accessed by buttons on the dash for quick access. Ford’s collaboration with Microsoft, SYNC, works great with my iPhone, enabling handsfree calling and music playback through the speakers via Bluetooth.
Some of the standard or available features on the MKT include Active Parking Assist, laser-guided cruise control with collision warning and brake support, Blind Spot Information Mirror (BLIS®) with cross traffic alert, optional THX II® Certified 5.1 Surround Sound System and a rear view camera system.
The MKT was a definite surprise in its four day stay with CarThrottle. While space in the third row and behind it wasn’t cavernous, the same can be said for nearly every vehicle in this segment. At around $58k as equipped the MKT isn’t cheap either, but it isn’t intended to be. The MKT offers features that the competition doesn’t, like cooled seats in the second row and a refrigerator, as well as V8-like power with V6-like fuel economy from EcoBoost.
I haven’t had a chance to evaluate it for comparison purposes, but a similarly equipped Audi Q7 will run you closer to $70K. The Q7′s fuel economy is also much worse; on the MKT I averaged around 18.8 mpg (and that’s while testing) in a mix of city and highway driving.
For many, a crossover makes sense – a similarly equipped luxury sedan (like the MKS, for instance) will be priced similar to the 2010 Lincoln MKT. With the MKT you get added utility and the ability to carry more people.
As such, the MKT proved itself to be a capable, luxurious vehicle that just so happens to offer more utility than a sedan. For anyone looking for a luxury crossover, putting the MKT on your list is a must. I highly recommend it! Oh and by the way, did I mention EcoBoost?

Follow us on Twitter

































As good as the car might drive, I just absolutely CANNOT get over the styling. I think it’s horrible looking. To me it looks very ungainly, overweight and overdone. Like the Flex that it’s based on, as good as the mechanical bits may be, ultimately I’d have to look at it every day. And that’s the real shame in it.
I drove a Buick Enclave for a few weeks, thought it was gorgeous and drove much better (read: smaller) than it’s size would indicate, with a quiet and first-rate interior. Also, it’s loaded up price is merely the starting point for the Lincoln. Having said that, for the same price I would probably lean toward the MDX or Q7 if I need three rows. Ultimately if my needs just call for 5-passenger capacity (they do), I’d have to go with a FX35 or X5.
It’s just that, IMO, Lincoln doesn’t quite deliver the cachet that the other luxury brands do. Maybe over the years they can earn it, but for now I think it still represents just loaded-up Ford products. The MKS seems nice, but then again why get it over a loaded ’10 Taurus? Same for the MKZ/Fusion; ditto the MKX/Edge; etc. Heck, I think that Buick I drove has about the same prestige as a Lincoln. They just haven’t separated themselves enough from the more pedestrian brands yet. When they get at least ONE dedicated platform (like Cadillac, Lexus and the like), then I’d consider giving them a shot.
I appreciate your thoughts. I shared ones similar but in person I found that the look really works. It would be interesting to be able to test the Enclave and compare with the MKT. I am impressed with the Enclave’s styling inside and out.
Lincoln’s latest is based on Ford products, but I know certainly with the MKT the two look nothing alike inside and out – the materials and attention to detail on the MKT are top notch – worthy of a luxury brand. I agree with the original Fusion/Milan/Zephyr combination there was less differentiation.
A RWD platform for a production MKR would do a lot for Lincoln’s brand image right now I think.
I can’t wait to see the MKT in dealerships and check one out for myself.
Cool car! Great review, very informative.
The Enclave is nice but the two don’t really compete head on. MKT competes with the Q7, R-Class, etc.
It is certainly an interesting car. The styling is definitely hit or miss. Looking at the front makes it look like a baleen whale about to feed.
Styling aside, it does look like Lincoln has a compelling car here. The price will put a lot of people off, considering there is a more contemporary, though arguably less luxurious Buick Enclave, out on the market.
Audi Q7? Tangential market competitor, yes. But definitely not in the same class.
Tony great review, but im not crazy about the design, and it is a FORD, which both my dad and I got burned by. He bought a dog 1988 mercury sable which was a POS, and i got a 1994 Explorer which was also a total DOG, everything went wrong with that POS, including the door handle breaking off at 40,000 miles, and rear windshield wiper breaking under warrenty and continuing to break every few months afterwards. Bottom line for me was I spent more weekends at a Ford dealership getting stuff fixed then I did enjoying my weekends. I’ll stick with Acura MDX if I was going for this type of crossover.
Excellent, nicely detailed write-up. Only thing I’d kind of like to see is more than two paragraphs on the driving experience. Though I suppose the real story in this case is the exterior styling and interior ambiance.
I am curious about your comment where you stressed the car must be in the right color. What do you mean? I have ordered the car in cinammon with black interior. I have read about every review on this car and they have been universally positive to raving. I think the styling is unique and intriguing, and the Ecoboost is getting great press. I am excited about driving a Lincoln. I have had a Cadillac STS V-8 and loved the car, but I need the three rows of seats.
I think strong colors would probably look best on it. Cinnamon would probably compliment it well too. In person I want to see the different ones so I can tell for sure.
I am not a fan of crossovers. Let’s start making station wagons, er, estates (since management resides in the UK) like we used to. Taller vehicles built on car platforms only add weight and detract from handling. In the process of making up for all that, the overall experience is diminished.
That said, these new Lincolns are looking sharp. I am not particularly fond of this model, as the rear end feels lacking in terms of the front end’s styling attention to detail. It smells a bit like an F150 with Lincoln badges all over it all over again.
The MKS, however, I have had the pleasure – yes, pleasure – of seeing in person on multiple occasions. It is stunning to behold. Ford delivers all the beefy heft of the Chrysler 300, but with a far more elegant stroke of the pen. So long as build quality and performance are adequate, this styling trend stands to do wonders for Ford’s position in the near-luxury segment.
I haven’t had the chance to extensively check the MKS out in person, but I’d like to soon. I’m more interested in it now after spending time with the MKT.
I have never ordered a new car sight unseen before, but the specs on the MKT blew me away. I think (hope) the styling grows on you… I will find out when mine comes. I really appreciate reviews like this one – Tony has addressed many of my questions. New looks either grow on you as you see them more (in person 3-dimensions) or they stay “ugly”.
The interior looks fantastic! Lincoln nailed this one square on! It has every feature that my 2004 Jag XJ8 has (and then some) for $20K less. The ecoboost powertrain is just what this type of vehicle needs. I regularly take 5 – 7 adults around and this is one of the few vehicles that looks up to the task. I also own a 2004 Jaguar XJ8 and can see the influence on the interior (some of the switchgear and fittings are identical to the Jag).
My first Ford product was the 1998 Lincoln Navigator and I was stunned at how well done it was. I kept it for 3 years and NEVER had a single problem. It was the first new vehicle I have ever owned that did not need ANY defect correction. (I have had new cars from 1973 on). I trusted Ford enough after that to try a Jag X-Type when they first came out – again, a flawless car. I now have a 2007 Lincoln Mark LT pickup – once again flawless (a bit thirsty for fuel, however). I am trading in the Mark LT for the MKT. Ford / Lincoln really have broken the code on great quality.
I had purchased a 2004 Chrysler Pacifica when they first came out in 2003 – with every possible option. It was just more stuff to break. The Pacifica was a great idea that was poorly executed. We had numerous problems that the dealer never seemed able to fix. The Mercedes R Class is a better built version of the same vehicle – identical dimensions etc. – just a bit too small to handle 6 adults in any kind of comfort, legroom being the issue as my adult daughters don’t need too much headroom :-).
Based on my experience with 2 Lincolns and 2 Jaguars (when Ford owned them) I am confident that the MKT will be an outstanding vehicle. Too bad it is coming to the market at a terrible time. I truly hope that Ford is successful with this – the American economy needs some good news. Ford has earned my trust with the products they have built and they have managed the company so that I as a taxpayer don’t have to bail them out. Good cars + good company = reason to buy!
Thanks for a very informative review!
Thank you! I’m glad you liked the review. I do think that you will be happy with it once you get it and see it in person. You’ll have to let us know what you think when it arrives! By the way, what color combination did you pick?
I picked the Red Candy Metallic with Black interior, walnut wood trim. I selected the Eco-Boost model along with the Elite package. That, with the extra cost color brings the car to a sticker of $54,290. Not sure what I will really end up paying, but I don’t expect to pay the full sticker price (I have never done that before). My wife and I are both engineers and take our cars real seriously. You have a great column, the photos are interesting and USEFUL. Keep up the great work, and thanks again. I’ll keep you posted as to how things unfold. I have already read the owners manual cover to cover (it is available on line from Ford in pdf for free!) so I am ready to go. Still don’t know when it is coming. I was the first to order on in the area back in May…. should be soon.
Tony, thanks for the review. While I’m not really sure I need a vehicle as big as the MKT, your point around the pricing compared to a luxury sedan hits home. Extra flexibility when you need it, for a similar price and loaded with technical gizmos.
What did you think of the steel blue color of your tester? I’ve been driving silver cars for a while, and am thinking MKT in Steel Blue or maybe the Sterling Grey (yeah, OK they’re both sort of silver-ish).
Sean.
I liked the way Steel Blue looked on the MKT a lot. It is a different looking color, not the usual that you see out there. From people I know who saw the car, it got quite a few compliments. One thing I’ve noticed is that the color looks a lot better on the MKT than it does on the MKS.
Tony – We just picked up our Red Candy Metallic with Black interior, walnut wood trim MKT and you were right! It really does look much better in person than in the photos – we LOVE it!!! We also own a 2004 Jaguar XJ8, and I can really see why Ford purchased Jag – they ended up getting a lot of technology/fit finish ideas that made their way into the MKT (and MKS as well I imagine). My daughter has an Audi A6 Quattro and I would say that the MKT feels like a synthesis of the smoothness and luxury of the Jag, with the tautness and road grip of the Audi, and the interior space of the Mercedes R Class (and more). I really think Lincoln has a genuine winner here. It almost feels like a whole new class of vehicle, since the term crossover does not do it justice. It drives more like a good European sport wagon, and definitely drives much more nimbly than it’s size would suggest. I mainly drive the Jag in the family, and when I got into the MKT, I tended to try to treat it the same as I do the Jag (I enjoy a good corner at speed), and to my delight it responded willingly and without hesitation. I really don’t want to hear that the Americans don’t know how to design and build good cars – they don’t get much better than the MKT. All the people who would need to sit in the third row in my family are under 5’8″ so the fit for them is just fine – the seats are comfortable. If you are above 5’9″ the third row is not for you, but the second row rivals any limousine out there.
People really need to compare it to Audi, Mercedes and BMW (I have owned all of them) – they will be VERY pleasantly surprised. The MKT is a true delight for ALL the senses – it feels great, looks great (especially the interior) and the Scottish leather is heavenly.
IF our local area (Northern Virginia) is any indication, they hit the dealers on Monday the 5th of October. I would highly recommend that folks go take a look just for the fun of it – it will make you feel better about American cars.
Congratulations on getting the MKT! Must be very exciting seeing the car for the first time! I’m glad you found the review helpful.
I agree with the difficulty in classification – it transcends them. Really does feel unlike anything else out there.
I know that if consumers do their homework and compare it with the competition, it will definitely exceed Ford’s sales expectations.
I own two LTC, 1990 and 1992 signature and executive series.
I am very disappointed in Lincoln dropping out of that design line of those partucular years. I can understand a slight change in design, but the drastic change from that line has made the Lincoln look totally stupid. It is also a mystery to me as to why some people at Lincoln must think they have a great car out there. One of the quirks of the new design in all the cars of today is the wedge shape, whereas the nose is shaped down and the back-end is up, limiting the area of the rear window and the visibilithy as well. I am sympathizing with a very dear friend at this time who owns one of these “wedgies” with the small rear window—as she backed out of her driveway and could not see the top of her 5-year-old son, who was crushed to death. I simply do not understand the concept of wedge-shaping a vehicle which will not benefit any more aerodynamically or otherwise on the road where the speed limits are a maximum of 70 mph. What was wrong with the design of the 1990-1994 Lincoln Town Cars? What is with the minds of designers who think “beetle” shaped vehicles are the thing?
i loved it. it was grat. grat work gratworkk
tony i enjoyed them all. about the mkt and all thowes other ones to. and igust hayd noting to do and i thoyt lets lets go read tonys graet rivwwes
i liked the review a lot nice work tony